This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Difference between revisions of "Patricia Krenik"

From Scientolipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(A Better Bridge for the Upper Levels?)
 
m (typo correction)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Auditors
 
{{Auditors
 +
|Image=Pat 3.jpg
 
|Name=Patricia Krenik
 
|Name=Patricia Krenik
−
|Training Level=ClassVI
+
|Training Level=Class VI
 
|Case Level=OT-8
 
|Case Level=OT-8
−
|Auditing Delivery=Grades, Intro Auditing, Life Repair, NED
 
 
|Case Supervision=Class VIII
 
|Case Supervision=Class VIII
 
|Country=US
 
|Country=US
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|Social Media=http://www.facebook.com
 
|Social Media=http://www.facebook.com
 
|Email=p_krenik@hotmail.com
 
|Email=p_krenik@hotmail.com
−
|Phone=360 482 4287  
+
|Phone=360 482 4287
 +
|Auditing Delivery=Grades, Intro Auditing, Life Repair, NED
 
}}
 
}}
−
'''NEW OT LEVELS VS OLD OT LEVELS'''By Patricia Krenik, June 1, 2012
+
Hello.  I would like to introduce myself to new people to this website, and to the new Indies (Independent Scientologists) who are coming out of the Church.
  
−
''I would like to start out with a “fair use” quote from Pierre Ethier’s upperlevelbridge.com because he says it so well:''“There is no such thing as OLD and NEW OT Levels, except within RTC's feverish mind (and therefore those of its followers). Except for "old OT I" (originally developed in 1966 and found in 1967 by LRH to be a dead-end), there has not been, since 1967 any "OLD OT Levels".
+
QUALIFICATIONS:
  
−
Its core issues written up in 1969, LRH found OT VIII to be "only for a High level Thetan", and the gradient simply too steep for most people, even a Full OT 7 completion. It took nearly a decade for tech to be developed to address those points.
+
I'm Patricia Krenik, Founding Scientologist 1951. That means I have spent more than 60 years in Dianetics and Scientology, both in and out of the Church.
  
−
Finally in 1978, LRH triumphantly announced that NOTS was the answer and the prerequisite for OT VIII. NOTS was found to be a far longer rundown than originally expected. Unfortunately over the next few years, RTC and the CSI (Church of Scientology International) re-wrote the bridge solely for "Marketing" and "Income Making Purposes" and not for "technical Reasons". NOTS, became "New OT V". The Solo NOTS Course (NOT an OT level, by any standard), became "New OT VI", and Solo NOTS (essentially the continuation of NOTS auditing, but done Solo, became "New OT VII".  
+
In the Church I was trained through Class VI, and am a Class VI C/S. Unfortunately when I became active again in the freezone in the 90's, there weren't any "Freezoners" or Indpendent Scientologists who would show their heads who were Class VIII or above. I found myself in a position of needing to deliver what what needed and wanted--the upper levels.
−
This was done, disregarding the obvious fact that by making "New Levels", the previous ones of the same name automatically became "OLD", in complete contrast to the Issues on technical Degrades. The issues on technical degrades are deemed so important by LRH, that he has ordered them to be at the beginning of every single course in Scientology. There is also no issue whatsoever or even order from LRH advising to market NOTS and Solo NOTS as "New OT V-VII" and to drop the previous line-up. This was a "bright idea" entirely dreamed up by the "New Management".”
+
 
−
Here in Elma WA we refer to NOTS as “audited NOTs” and “solo NOTs” rather than to call it the “new OT V” or “new OT VII”.  Ray (my husband) and I both consider this important, because the use of “new OT V” for example rather implies that the original OT V is “old and not used anymore”.  Indeed, the original OT IV, V, VI, and VII were removed from the Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart by the RTC.  We refer to that bridge as the RTC bridge.
+
I have been doing that successfully for many years now.  I started out C/Sing OT III, not really having much information, so I just made sure that the auditors who were soloing it were doing what the materials said.  That worked, and gave me confidence.
−
It is in direct violation of the Technical Degrades HCOB of 17 June 1970R and revised 9 April 1977.  Since the bridge (as outlined by the “Grade Chart”—See Classification, Gradation and Awareness Chart) is the basic format a C/S uses to guide the pc or pre-OT toward freedom this is a non-standard bridge.
+
 
−
''Unfortunately, we do not have a bridge written up that actually reflects what a c/s does or can do regarding the upper sections.  No C/S trained properly would actually toss out the original OT Grades (often called “levels” even though the word “level” was primarily used for the training side of the bridge) and not use them simply because NOTs has arrived. The question becomes, when is the best time to introduce the original OT grades?
+
I'm self trained on Class VIII and on the NOTs materials, and I have trained others on NOTs, all with good results.
−
At our Revitalizing Ministry in Elma WA we follow the 1981 bridge, but with reservations. It really is important to get a pc, who has finished OT III onto NOTs as soon as possible.  Yet the OT III Drug Rundown has not been canceled.  The original OT VII which improved the pre-OT’s ability to project intention was at one time placed after OT III, to increase the person’s skill as a solo auditor among other things.  (See C/S Series 39R). It would seem to me that that very same skill would be useful in solo auditing NOTs.
+
 
−
Then there is the matter of Dianetic Clears.  Of course, currently they are just called “Clears” but the truth is they went clear without ever seeing the content of the Clearing Course.  The original OT IV proofs up a being so he will never become the effect of any possible future CC course implant, so we certainly don’t want to drop out this technology.
+
I work with my husband, Raymond J. Krenik, Jr. who is the E.D. of our group.  He is the one who puts the Academy there.  We had the first Academy in the Independent Field, soon it will be 16 years.  That record speaks for itself.  In the Free Zone, unlike in the COS, it is a free market.  People can go where they choose.  If you don't produce results you go out of business.   
−
In C/S Series 34R LRH recommends the L’s to be done after OT III.  This HCOB was, of course written before the NOTs materials entered the standard tech scene.  The L’s aren’t part of the bridge; they are considered “boosters”.  Perhaps the ideal scene would be to consider the original OT grades as “boosters” and find an ideal place for them to be inserted on the bridge lineup.  If the L’s are recommended after OT III, then certainly OT IV and possibly OT V (original) would find a home there for many people at the option of the C/S  (Which puts them where they were on the original 1980 chart.)
+
 
−
I know one well trained NOTs C/S who is adamant on having the pre-OT going directly to audited NOTs, and if any sign of drugs reading do the NOTs Drug Rundown as soon as feasible.  Yet in actual practice in the COS they ran the OT III Drug Rd. as soon as the person routed onto “New NOTs IV”.
+
Now I would like to hear from some of you.  What you did in Scientology--or if you are brand new, what you would like Scientology to help you with.  You can always reach me at p_krenik@hotmail.com
−
Technically it doesn’t make good sense to me to run the OT III Drug Rundown after OT III.  If a person has a heavy drug history and it appears to be reading, wouldn’t the best place to do an OT III Drug Rundown BEFORE the pre-OT solo audits OT III but after the OT III study?  Drugs do make a resistive case, correct? 
+
 
−
It does make good sense to me if the person isn’t reading on drugs and completes OT III that his next step is the NOTS Drug Rundown if there is any evidence of drugs reading.
+
REVITALIZING MINISTRY
−
If no evidence of drugs reading what a good spot for the L’s, Super Power, audited original OT VII, or the original OT IV and OT V.  It takes a very stable exterior being to run the original OT VI, so in general I believe that NOTS thoroughly done belongs before the original OT VI.  Not a hard-set rule, but something to consider.  Otherwise one risks a failure on OT VI.
+
 
−
LRH once mentioned that he wanted us to get busy and build a better bridge. Someone (I don’t remember who) once countered and said since then we have built a better bridge. That is partially true…the fact is there have been several “bridges” built since that comment of LRH, including the RTC bridge that overtly wiped out the OT levels and replaced them with NOTs without stating where these dropped out levels would be applied.
+
We are located in Elma, WA which is a very small town 30 miles West of Olympia, WA the capital.
−
So I propose:
+
Our Academy does all the levels and the solo course.  Our students study and audit each level as they go along.  
−
OT I
+
 
−
OT II
+
We maintain shared living quarters for students at a moderate rate for their convenience to the study area and to help their pocketbooks.  There is a newer Microtel a mile or so from out Academy though, if you prefer privacy.
−
OT III—Study
+
 
−
OT III, Drug Rundown if Necessary audited by another
+
Feel free to write me any time. More information available at www.freezoneelma.com
−
OT III, solo to EP.
+
 
−
(Optional…L’s,  Super Power, (if not already run) 
+
Patricia Krenik
−
(C/S discretion, audited OT VII, audited OT IV, audited OT V)
+
 
−
NOTs Drug Rd, NOTS style
+
[[FreeZone Academy of Elma WA]]
−
Audited NOTS
+
 
−
Solo NOTs Study
+
== articles ==
−
Solo NOTs to completion
+
* [[The Game of Scientolgy, by Patricia Krenik]]
−
Original OT levels not yet run
+
* [[Patricia Krenik-Tips for Auditors]]
−
OT VIII
+
*[http://scientolipedia.org/info/Talk:Reading_and_Unreading_Auditing_Questions discussion re: Reading and Unreading Auditing Questions]
 +
*[[Pat Krenik - Running "Objectives"]]
 +
*[http://scientolipedia.org/info/The_LRH_I_Knew The LRH I Knew]
 +
*[[Pat Krenik-How To Recognize Friends]]
 +
* [[Patricia Krenik - Overview of Early Days in Dianetics and Scientology]]
 +
 
 +
== success stories ==
 +
{{#ask:[[Has auditor::Patricia Krenik||FreeZone Academy of Elma WA]]
 +
|format=ul
 +
|limit=20
 +
|link=all
 +
|headers=show
 +
|mainlabel=
 +
|searchlabel=… further results
 +
|class=sortable wikitable smwtable
 +
}}
  
−
I believe this would be a better bridge than the RTC bridge.  I would love input from other C/Ses, especially if they believe that this bridge isn’t workable, or violates standard tech in any way.''
+
__NOTITLE__

Latest revision as of 07:52, July 14, 2017

Patricia Krenik
Pat 3.jpg
Patricia Krenik
Training Level Class VI
Case Level OTOperating Thetan - 7. this state of being is attained by drills and familiarity after the state of Clear has been obtained. A real OT has no reactive bank, is cause over matter, energy, space, time and thought and is completely free. (HCOB 12 Jul 65)...More-8
Auditing Offered Grades, Intro Auditing, Life RepairThe entry level for Scientology auditing. One handles life areas, cleaning up and keying-out those areas of bank which life itself has brought into restimulation., NED
Case Supervision Class VIIIThe Class VIII Course teaches exact handling of all cases up to 100 per cent result, as well as Class VIII procedures, all case setup actions, all processes and corrective actions, as well as flubless Class VIII auditing. (Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
Country USUnited States. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976).
State WA
City Elma
Postal Code 98541
Geo
Website http://community.freezone-tech.info/elma
Social Media http://www.facebook.com
Email p_krenik@hotmail.com
Phone 360 482 4287

Hello. I would like to introduce myself to new people to this website, and to the new Indies (Independent Scientologists) who are coming out of the Church.

QUALIFICATIONS:

I'm Patricia Krenik, Founding Scientologist 1951. That means I have spent more than 60 years in Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more and Scientology, both in and out of the Church.

In the Church I was trained through Class VI, and am a Class VI C/S2. the C/S is the case supervisor. He has to be an accomplished and properly certified auditor and a person trained additionally to supervise cases...MORE. Unfortunately when I became active again in the freezone in the 90's, there weren't any "Freezoners" or Indpendent Scientologists who would show their heads who were Class VIIIThe Class VIII Course teaches exact handling of all cases up to 100 per cent result, as well as Class VIII procedures, all case setup actions, all processes and corrective actions, as well as flubless Class VIII auditing. (Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975) or above. I found myself in a position of needing to deliver what what needed and wanted--the upper levels.

I have been doing that successfully for many years now. I started out C/SingA case supervisor direction of what to audit on a pc. (HCOB 23 Aug 71) OTOperating Thetan - 7. this state of being is attained by drills and familiarity after the state of Clear has been obtained. A real OT has no reactive bank, is cause over matter, energy, space, time and thought and is completely free. (HCOB 12 Jul 65)...More III, not really having much information, so I just made sure that the auditors who were soloing it were doing what the materials said. That worked, and gave me confidence.

I'm self trained on Class VIIIThe Class VIII Course teaches exact handling of all cases up to 100 per cent result, as well as Class VIII procedures, all case setup actions, all processes and corrective actions, as well as flubless Class VIII auditing. (Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975) and on the NOTsNew Era Dianetics for OT's. Done in two main sections after OT III. Audited NOTS (OT V) and Solo NOTS (OT VI & VII with OT VI being the course that trains the pre-OT how to solo audit NOTS) Note: OT IV is the OT Drug Rundown. materials, and I have trained others on NOTsNew Era Dianetics for OT's. Done in two main sections after OT III. Audited NOTS (OT V) and Solo NOTS (OT VI & VII with OT VI being the course that trains the pre-OT how to solo audit NOTS) Note: OT IV is the OT Drug Rundown., all with good results.

I work with my husband, Raymond J. Krenik, Jr. who is the E.D. of our group. He is the one who puts the Academy there. We had the first Academy in the Independent Field, soon it will be 16 years. That record speaks for itself. In the Free Zone, unlike in the COS, it is a free market. People can go where they choose. If you don't produce results you go out of business.

Now I would like to hear from some of you. What you did in Scientology--or if you are brand new, what you would like Scientology to help you with. You can always reach me at p_krenik@hotmail.com

REVITALIZING MINISTRY

We are located in Elma, WA which is a very small town 30 miles West of Olympia, WA the capital. Our Academy does all the levels and the solo course. Our students study and auditThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975) each level as they go along.

We maintain shared living quarters for students at a moderate rate for their convenience to the study area and to help their pocketbooks. There is a newer Microtel a mile or so from out Academy though, if you prefer privacy.

Feel free to write me any time. More information available at www.freezoneelma.com

Patricia Krenik

FreeZone Academy of Elma WA

articles

success stories


Retrieved from "https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Patricia_Krenik&oldid=20228"