Blanking the DEEP Clearing article
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.
I reversed the blanking of the DEEP Clearing article because that is not the right way to edit or correct inaccuracies. (if there are some)
The better way to handle this is to postA position from which a terminal operates in an org, where one knows that somebody is at. (FO 2200)
a comment on the Discussion page associated with the article. You can find it in the upper left of the page as a tab, next to the "article" tab. http://scientolipedia.org/info/Talk:Deep_Clearing_by_Rolf_Dane
The editor/author of the page will be notified and see your comments and have the opportunity to respond so that the edits can be made with agreement.
If/when you reply to this message, I will be likewise notified and can followup.
Hi Scientolipedia Admin,
I asked Antony Phillips (the author) to delete the page on DEEPAbbreviation for Decisions, Emotions, Energies, Polarities. A definition coined by Clearbird, based on chapter 2 of "A History of Man".. The reason is that we want to market it to the general public and not specifically to ex-scientologists.
Since the SCN brand name is quickly becoming a burden we do not want DEEP to associated with it.
I do not see the need "to make my casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)" on the public boards since both the author of the page, Antony, and myself agree to have it deleted.
Best,
Rolf Dane
I understand your wanting to distance yourself from what you see as a toxic brand, but the request compromises our integrity. If we alter or delete factual data about derivative practices of Scientology to appease people, we become less credible.
I have spoken with Antony and was waiting to hear from you before deciding about restoring the page.
We have to consider whether it is important to document ALL of the offshoots, SOME of the offshoots, or NONE of the offshoots. Do we postA position from which a terminal operates in an org, where one knows that somebody is at. (FO 2200) a disclaimer that SOME offshoots wish to remain anonymous due to the church's abuse of the brand? Maybe that is the solution...
