Offshoot template unexplained

There seems to be in outpoint here; missing data. Twice the offshoot template has been added giving the message "NOTE: This article discusses an offshoot. Offshoots are considered something OTHER than Scientology, as they were not developed by L. Ron Hubbard, and they have never been practiced in any Scientology Church." and no reason for the message has been given. It seems to be a bit of a generality and thus likely to produce ARC1. a word from the initial letters of Affinity, Reality, Communication which together equate to Understanding. It is pronounced by stating its letters, A-R- C. To Scientologists it has come to mean good feeling, love or friendliness, such as “He was in ARC with his friend.” One does not, however, fall out of ARC, he has an ARC break. (LRH Def. Notes)...more breaks (according to the data I remember from the Church of Scientology). I have difficulty in seeing what on this page "has never been practice in any Scientology Church".

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Antony A Phillips (talk)‎06:49, February 3, 2018

Scottt practices an offshoot even though this page doesn't reflect that.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Dl88008 (talk)‎18:12, February 3, 2018

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

I practice an "offshoot" of my own development, known as "FreeScientology" (links @ freescientology.us) However - and a very important point as you well know amongst Scientologists - what I do is little different from those who deliver Excalibur. That is an offshoot. But I do not see those tags on their pages. I can honestly say that I deliver Hubbard Scientology by the book. I can also say that I have made some modifications and deliver them as "FreeScientology." However, I never have and never will misrepresent what I am doing and what my level of formal training is, and I do not encourage anyone who asks for Standard Tech auditing to do otherwise than to do a complete lower Bridge to Clear and/or alternate route to Clear. Thus, what I am doing is not even remotely comparable to those who have dispensed with the Bridge and who have been known to troll Scn groups for clients (you know at least two people whom I refer to here), and in regards to such, I have been quite vocal in defending the preservation of doing a complete Scientology Bridge before doing any advanced auditing. I would like you to please reconsider the use of this "warning label" on my page - since I think you know exactly what effect that kind of thing has on ones ability to procure clients.

Return to Thread:Talk:Scott Gordon/Offshoot template unexplained/reply (2).