Recent change in ClearBird page

Fine. I note that the following paragraph was also removed and am checking to see if it is still accurate and will replace it if I find it to be so. "Clearbird is recognized by the Association of Professional Independent Scientologists (APIS) [1] for giving a technically correct rendition of Standard Technology."

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Antony A Phillips (talk)‎17:03, June 3, 2017

Have just checked with Rolf. The statement is accurate.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Antony A Phillips (talk)‎13:45, June 13, 2017

I pointed out to Ant but couldn't postA position from which a terminal operates in an org, where one knows that somebody is at. (FO 2200) here for some reason ... Clearbird materials feature "The GPMGoals-Problem-Mass. 4. the problem created by two or more opposing ideas which being opposed, balanced, and unresolved, make a mass. It’s a mental energy mass. (SH Spec 83, 6612C06...More processing that Ron never finished..." How can that not be an Offshoot? Also, don't ask Rolf. Go to the APIS site and look for yourself. If ever there was a recognition, that has been removed.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Bikoswartz (talk)‎00:24, June 18, 2017

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Mike from APIS confirmed the findings from the APIS website. APIS does not endorse the Clearbird materials. Now if we could please kindly discuss why promoting to deliver "the GPM processing that Ron never finished" does not qualify as an offshoot. I claim it does qualify for the label of offshoot.

Return to Thread:Talk:Clearbird/Recent change in ClearBird page/reply (6).