This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Blanking the DEEP Clearing article

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi Scientolipedia Editor,

Obviously I have a SCN background as I have done scn training prior to 1992. But DEEP is not SCN. I have researched it and written the materials between 2008 and pt. Now I want the public to benefit from it and that takes of course some promotion. I have been associated with a health newsletter, that want to promote our services. For this arrangement to work, I cannot be associated closely with SCN or be called an "offshot". I can appreciate that you work as a historian in the field. I am more concerned about getting my new technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech out and applied. I want to promote it to new people who want the benefits and the training.

Usually boards like scientolipedia are edited by the public and maybe monitored by an editor. But to set it up as some sort of one way trap for information or exposee publication is highly controversial in my opinion.

So I kindly ask you not to use your board to stop the practical application of the DEEP techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65). In my opinion, SCN is doomed due to the continued bad PRAbbreviation for public relations. The art of making good works well known. (HCO PL 21 Nov 72 I) and the abuses of the church. I have learned my lessons dearly and have developed a new techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) that takes care of the conflicts that SCN seems to have no cure for but rather create.

Best,

Rolf

Rolf dane (talk)‎10:14, September 5, 2015

Rolf,

"Boards like this..." are not a one way trap, we follow the wikipedia model where many can contribute content but ALL edits and new articles are subject to editorial overview and approval. (look into the controversy and fighting at wikipedia with church stooges trying to edit and slant articles about Scientology)

I don't like plagiarism and people failing to acknowledge L Ron Hubbard for his contributions.

We'll deal with documenting data about Scientology as best we can and take your concerns into consideration.

Dl88008 (talk)‎13:16, September 5, 2015

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Return to Thread:User talk:Rolf dane/Blanking the DEEP Clearing article/reply (5).

 
 
Retrieved from "https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Rolf_dane/Blanking_the_DEEP_Clearing_article/reply_(3)#Blanking_the_DEEP_Clearing_article_584"