Ignazio Tidu

Thanks a lot for the new video. This is so much better than previous one. I can’t validate the stage 4 read as the one I know from techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) films is way different than the one shown here. The F/Ns are fine, the theta bop is too slow, the D/N is not very ragged as it normally looks.

ML Ignazio.

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

User:Burkejon‎22:43, April 12, 2013

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Jonathan, I'm attaching my comments below Ignazio's as he sums it up pretty well in my opinion. This is greatly improved from the first one and I see much change from my original comments made. I have no problem with the FNs as they aren't always "picture perfect" in session; I agree with Pat and Ignazio on the theta bop (can you speed up the frame rate and loop it perhaps?); the tick should be more of a quick "jerk" or "tick" as Glenn and Trey point out; and as Ignazio states, the D/N needs to be more "erratic, ragged, jerky". Finally, if you could tone down that last sound that heralds the change in dial faces, I think, as Trey says, it would be less jarring. Just a volume thing. Other than that, you've created something that truly shows your "labour of love". Well done. ARC, Chris

Return to Thread:Talk:Critique - Meter Reads and Drills/Ignazio Tidu/reply.