Difference between revisions of "Scientolipedia Podcast Series"
(Created page with "<big>L</big>''eague'' ''of'' <big>E</big>''xtraordinary'' <big>T</big>''heta'' ''hacker''<big>S</big> {| class="wikitable" align="right" |- |{{#widget:YouTube|id=s-nn5nrymlE|...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|{{#widget:YouTube|id=s-nn5nrymlE|width-400|height=300}} | |{{#widget:YouTube|id=s-nn5nrymlE|width-400|height=300}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | == defs == | ||
| + | *'''''hacker 1''''' - hacker is a person who enjoys exploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playful cleverness<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28hobbyist%29 hacker (hobbyist)]</ref> | ||
| + | *'''''hacker 2''''' - A hacker is one who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming and circumventing limitations of programming systems and who tries to extend their capabilities. <ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28programmer_subculture%29 hacker (programmer subculture)]</ref> | ||
| + | *'''''hacker 3''''' - a hacker is someone who seeks and exploits weaknesses in a computer system or computer network.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28computer_security%29 hacker (computer security)]</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | We're using definitions 1 & 2 for our purposes | ||
| + | == huh? == | ||
the League of Extraordinary Theta hackerS is an initiative to bring together a wide variety of people with varying Internet and computer skills (ranging from novice/interested in learning, to professional level tech guru types) for a common purpose - i.e. create technology applications for broad-scale use by Scientologists and interested individuals. | the League of Extraordinary Theta hackerS is an initiative to bring together a wide variety of people with varying Internet and computer skills (ranging from novice/interested in learning, to professional level tech guru types) for a common purpose - i.e. create technology applications for broad-scale use by Scientologists and interested individuals. | ||
| − | Without a central organization/institution for the Field to rely on to furnish opportunities to train, audit, learn, share and embrace the subject of Scientology, we find ourselves using a hodgepodge of blogs, websites and social media | + | Without a central organization/institution for the Field to rely on to furnish opportunities to train, audit, learn, share and embrace the subject of Scientology, we find ourselves using a hodgepodge of blogs, websites and social media. |
| + | |||
| + | Although these provide great avenues for sharing information, the fact is, we can do a whole lot more with existing technologies than we are. | ||
| + | Many people have skills in various facets of today's technologies but they are not currently being utilized or ''allowed'' to contribute due simply to a lack of coordination. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == institutions == | ||
| + | The Central Org (institutional) model for organizing things is unworkable for our situation. Even if we could come to agreement on an "Executive Director" and various other staffing positions to follow the LRH policies he created for his institutions, it would be an effort that was doomed from the start due to the diverse and diffuse nature of the "Field". | ||
| + | |||
| + | The rigid institutional construct would not serve our purposes for another important reason, one that many modern corporations and institutions are coming to grips with as well, namely - too many people are ''excluded from contributing'' due to the fact they find themselves outside, not part of, separate from the institutional body. The institution has to rely on the work of those who are part of the institution and despite effort to include people from the outside, those people will always consider themselves to be outside the institutional framework. (and so will the institutional team members whether they overtly admit it or not) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :''“And I believe the freedom of the material which we know and understand is guaranteed only by lightness of organization, a maximum of people, good training and good, reliable, sound relay of information.''<ref>L Ron Hubbard - Anatomy of the Spirit of Man Congress - Lecture #15 What is Scientology Doing? 6 June 1955</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === references == | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | __NOTOC____NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Revision as of 01:42, May 19, 2014
League of Extraordinary Theta hackerS
defs
- hacker 1 - hacker is a person who enjoys exploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playful cleverness[1]
- hacker 2 - A hacker is one who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming and circumventing limitations of programming systems and who tries to extend their capabilities. [2]
- hacker 3 - a hacker is someone who seeks and exploits weaknesses in a computer system or computer network.[3]
We're using definitions 1 & 2 for our purposes
huh?
the League of Extraordinary Theta1. theta is thought, life force, elan vital, the spirit, the soul, or any other of the numerous definitions it has had for some thousands of years. (SOS, p. 4)...More
hackerS is an initiative to bring together a wide variety of people with varying Internet and computer skills (ranging from novice/interested in learning, to professional level techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) guru types) for a common purpose - i.e. create technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech applications for broad-scale use by Scientologists and interested individuals.
Without a central organization/institution for the Field to rely on to furnish opportunities to train, auditThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975), learn, share and embrace the subject of Scientology, we find ourselves using a hodgepodge of blogs, websites and social media.
Although these provide great avenues for sharing information, the fact is, we can do a whole lot more with existing technologies than we are. Many people have skills in various facets of today's technologies but they are not currently being utilized or allowed to contribute due simply to a lack of coordination.
institutions
The Central Org (institutional) model for organizing things is unworkable for our situation. Even if we could come to agreement on an "Executive Director" and various other staffing positions to follow the LRHL. Ron Hubbard policies he created for his institutions, it would be an effort that was doomed from the start due to the diverse and diffuse nature of the "Field".
The rigid institutional construct would not serve our purposes for another important reason, one that many modern corporations and institutions are coming to grips with as well, namely - too many people are excluded from contributing due to the fact they find themselves outside, not part of, separate from the institutional body. The institution has to rely on the work of those who are part of the institution and despite effort to include people from the outside, those people will always consider themselves to be outside the institutional framework. (and so will the institutional team members whether they overtly admit it or not)
- “And I believe the freedom of the material which we know and understand is guaranteed only by lightness of organization, a maximum of people, good training and good, reliable, sound relay of information.[4]
= references
- ^ hacker (hobbyist)
- ^ hacker (programmer subculture)
- ^ hacker (computer security)
- ^ L Ron Hubbard - Anatomy of the Spirit of Man Congress - Lecture #15 What is Scientology Doing? 6 June 1955
