Difference between revisions of "Science of Survival - Alterations"
(→Introduction) |
(→BOOK ONE) |
||
| Line 407: | Line 407: | ||
== CHAPTER FIVE (COLUMN E – Medical Range) == | == CHAPTER FIVE (COLUMN E – Medical Range) == | ||
| − | + | NONE PRESENTED <br><br><br> | |
| − | NONE PRESENTED | + | |
== CHAPTER SIX (The Basic Laws of Theta Affinity - Reality - Communication) == | == CHAPTER SIX (The Basic Laws of Theta Affinity - Reality - Communication) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 36 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-</b><b>36 </b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-42</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 40 | + | | valign="top" | We have thought of evolution in the past as something stretched <b>back along</b> the eons, as a graduated scale of various species which changed as the ages progressed down to our present life forms. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | We have thought of evolution in the past as something stretched <b>out back down</b> the eons, as a graduated scale of various species which changed as the ages progressed down to our present life forms. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | [Here is a great example of how a small change in word results in a substantial change in meaning.] | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-40</b> | |
| − | 1975: 41 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-45</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | One must also consider in a discussion of theta that theta is measured on a gradient tone scale from 0.0 upwards to 40.0. At the highest range, theta could be considered to be in a pure state. It would be a clear, even-flowing river. It would be reason at its highest. It would be complete rationality. It would be complete reality. It could accomplish complete communication in its own level. And it would be <b>pure</b> affinity. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | One must also consider, in a discussion of theta, that theta is measured on a gradient Tone Scale from 0.0 upwards to 40.0. At the highest range, theta could be considered to be in a pure state. It would be a clear, even-flowing river. It would be reason at its highest. It would be complete rationality. It would be complete reality. It could accomplish complete communication in its own level. And it would be <b>purely</b> affinity. | |
| − | 1975: 44 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Here is a great example of how a small change in word results in a substantial change in meaning.</i>]<br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 44 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-41</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-48</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Below 2.0, MEST and theta are at best turbulently united. Above, they<b> are united</b> more and more smoothly as they rise up the scale, the MEST more and more under the influence of theta, the theta more and more able to do things with the MEST. | |
| − | [Word “depress” cannot even be used in the way it is used in 2007 text.] | + | | valign="top" | Below 2.0, MEST and theta are at best turbulently united. Above 2.0, they <b>unite</b> more and more smoothly as they rise up the scale, the MEST more and more under the influence of theta, the theta more and more able to do things with the MEST. |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 46 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-44</b> |
| − | Seventh: the urge of theta to survive, the urge of the individual to promote the survival of theta and to survive through the survival of theta. | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-51</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| + | | Some <b>rare people</b> behave and reason like MEST clears. | ||
| + | | Some <b>people, in rare instances,</b> behave and reason like MEST Clears. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-44</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-51</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | They, however, do not greatly retain the enturbulence, and as soon as they are free from such -an entheta environment they restore immediately to a cleared state. Further, they do not <b>sink</b> very far down the tone scale.<br> | ||
| + | | valign="top" | They, however, do not greatly retain the enturbulence and as soon as they are free from such an entheta environment, they restore immediately to a Cleared state. Further, they do not <b>depress</b> very far down the Tone Scale.<br> | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Word “depress” cannot even be used in the way it is used in 2007 text.</i>]<br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-46</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-53</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Seventh: the urge of theta to survive, the urge of the individual to promote the survival of theta and to survive through the survival of theta. <br><br> | ||
Any of these dynamics can be broken down into the three component parts of affinity, communication, and reality. | Any of these dynamics can be broken down into the three component parts of affinity, communication, and reality. | ||
| − | + | | valign="top" | SEVENTH: the urge of theta to survive, the urge of the individual to promote the survival of theta and to survive through the survival of theta. <br><br><b>EIGHT: the urge toward survival through the Supreme Being. The number eight, laid on its side, gives us the symbol for infinity.</b><br><br> | |
| − | + | Any of these dynamics can be broken down into the three component parts of affinity, communication and reality.<br> | |
| − | SEVENTH: the urge of theta to survive, the urge of the individual to promote the survival of theta and to survive through the survival of theta. | + | |- |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-47</b> | |
| − | EIGHT: the urge toward survival through the Supreme Being. The number eight, laid on its side, gives us the symbol for infinity. | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-54</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | Any of these dynamics can be broken down into the three component parts of affinity, communication and reality. | + | | valign="top" | The seventh dynamic would be that of theta itself, which is composed in its component parts, according to our postulates, of affinity, reality, and communication. <br> |
| − | + | [<i>the chapter ends here</i>] | |
| − | 1975: 47 | + | | valign="top" | The Seventh Dynamic would be that of theta itself, which is composed in its component parts, according to our postulates, of affinity, reality and communication. <br><br><b>The Eighth Dynamic would be the dynamic of the Supreme Being, or the Creator. That would be God. One could consider that God created the physical universe and the theta universe.</b><br> |
| − | The seventh dynamic would be that of theta itself, which is composed in its component parts, according to our postulates, of affinity, reality, and communication. | + | [<i>the chapter ends here</i>]<br> |
| − | [the chapter ends here] | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [The two sentences defining the Eighth Dynamic were not written by L. Ron Hubbard. This text does not appear even in 2001 altered edition. How exactly does one survive “through” the Supreme Being? And in the second sentence “One could consider...” - this sounds completely arbitrary. One can consider many things – they do not suddenly become formal definitions of key terms in the science of Dianetics! <br><br> | |
| − | + | The ONLY place where a definition for the Eighth Dynamic appears in the original text of Science of Survival is in the Publisher's Introduction – the very section that was not included in either 2001 or 2007 altered versions of the book. The definition went as follows: <br><br> | |
| − | The Seventh Dynamic would be that of theta itself, which is composed in its component parts, according to our postulates, of affinity, reality and communication. | + | 1975: xi) Dynamic eight is the urge toward survival as a part of or ward of a Supreme Being. The number eight, laid on its side, gives us the symbol -∞- for infinity. <br><br> |
| − | + | Even a more precise definition of the Eighth Dynamic is given in the original Fundamentals of Thought book:<br><br> | |
| − | The Eighth Dynamic would be the dynamic of the Supreme Being, or the Creator. That would be God. One could consider that God created the physical universe and the theta universe. | + | 1975: 38) “THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as Infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. <b>It is carefully observed here that the </b><i><b>science</b></i><b>of Scientology does not intrude into the Dynamic of the Supreme Being.</b> This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the INFINITY or GOD DYNAMIC.” <br><br> |
| − | [the chapter ends here] | + | Note, the sentence in bold does not appear in the corresponding text of 2007 altered edition of Fundamentals of Thought. For more information on alterations in this book, see a <a href="../5609_FOT/alter_FOT.html" target="_blank">separate alterations report</a>.]<br><br><br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | [The two sentences defining the Eighth Dynamic were not written by L. Ron Hubbard. This text does not appear even in 2001 altered edition. How exactly does one survive “through” the Supreme Being? And in the second sentence “One could consider...” - this sounds completely arbitrary. One can consider many things – they do not suddenly become formal definitions of key terms in the science of Dianetics | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | The ONLY place where a definition for the Eighth Dynamic appears in the original text of Science of Survival is in the Publisher's Introduction – the very section that was not included in either 2001 or 2007 altered versions of the book. The definition went as follows: | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: xi | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Even a more precise definition of the Eighth Dynamic is given in the original Fundamentals of Thought book: | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 38 | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Note, the sentence in bold does not appear in the corresponding text of 2007 altered edition of Fundamentals of Thought. For more information on alterations in this book, see a | + | |
== CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN F – Emotion) == | == CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN F – Emotion) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 53 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-53</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-61</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Here is a perfect example of how a skilled use of a semicolon demonstrating author's extensive experience as a writer was “corrected” by replacing it with a period which results in poor grammar and an unpleasant interruption of the smooth flow of author's thought.] | + | | valign="top" | In running secondary engrams, or painful emotion, the auditor must develop considerable skill. One cannot, for instance, bluntly demand <u>grief; nor</u><b></b>can one bluntly demand fear. Skill and tact are required to <b>reach</b> the necessary incident to resolve the case. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | In running secondary engrams or painful emotion, the auditor must develop considerable skill. One cannot, for instance, bluntly demand <u>grief. Nor</u><b></b>can one bluntly demand fear. <b>Considerable</b> skill and tact are required to <b>contact</b> the necessary incident to resolve the case. | |
| − | 1975: 54 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Here is a perfect example of how a skilled use of a semicolon demonstrating author's extensive experience as a writer was “corrected” by replacing it with a period which results in poor grammar and an unpleasant interruption of the smooth flow of author's thought.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-54</b> |
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-61</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | If one could run off a case all painful emotion—all <b>unexpressed </b>resentment, anger, fear, grief, and apathy— one would have a dianetic release whether he touched physical pain engrams or not. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | If one could run off from a case all painful emotion— all <b>expressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief and apathy— one would have a Dianetic Release whether he touched physical pain engrams or not. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>How is this for a "correction"?</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN G – Affinity) == | == CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN G – Affinity) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 56 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-56</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-64</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 56 | + | | valign="top" | One commonly finds this in children, who <b>when</b> growing older and receiving rejections and rebuffs, first from one or two people and then from many, will gradually experience the blunting of their affinity. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | One commonly finds this in children, who <b>then</b> growing older and receiving rejections and rebuffs, first from one or two people and then from many, will gradually experience the blunting of their affinity. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | [Here “his own person” means himself.] | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-56</b> | |
| − | 1975: 57 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-64</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Around 2.5 the individual begins to neglect <b>his own person</b>, or people in general. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Around 2.5 the individual begins to neglect <b>persons</b> or people in general. | |
| − | [Notice how replacing “past” for “last” noticeably reduces clarity of the sentence.] | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Here “his own person” means himself.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | 1975: 57 | + | {| border="1" <br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-57</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-65</b> | |
| − | [How is this for generating some confusion which is already present in 2001 edition? Hey, at least “rise” was not changed to “raise” in this sentence.] | + | |- |
| + | | valign="top" | For instance, the rejected sweetheart reaching this level of grief may invent all manner of odd and peculiar incidents of cruelty on the part of the <b>last</b> lover in order to win the sympathy of those around her. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | For instance, the rejected sweetheart, reaching this level of grief, may invent all manner of odd and peculiar incidents of cruelty on the part o f the <b>past</b> lover in order to win the sympathy of those around her. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Notice how replacing “past” for “last” noticeably reduces clarity of the sentence.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-57</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-65</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor has a handy measuring stick with the affinity scale, since he can, by observing the pre-clear, <b>establish the position of the pre-clear on the chart</b>. Further, by watching <b>pre-clear’s attitude toward people or groups</b> he can see the improvement of the relations of the pre-clear with others and, he can see the gradual rise in tone of the case. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor has a handy measuring stick with the affinity scale, since he can, by observing the preclear, <b>establish the preclear’s attitude toward people or groups and discover the position of the preclear on the chart</b>. Further, by watching <b>the relations of the preclear with others</b> improve, he can see the gradual rise in tone of the case. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>How is this for generating some confusion which is already present in 2001 edition? Hey, at least “rise” was not changed to “raise” in this sentence.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER NINE (Communication and Reality) == | == CHAPTER NINE (Communication and Reality) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 59 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-59</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-69</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [“...by the physical universe” as if the physical universe has a mind of its own all of a sudden.] | + | | valign="top" | It might be said that we have potentially a sensory reception mechanism for every type of sense message which can be radiated or delivered to us <b>from</b> the physical universe, and from the theta universe. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | It might be said that we have, potentially, a sensory reception mechanism for every type of sense message which can be radiated or delivered to us <b>by</b> the physical universe and from the theta universe | |
| − | 1975: 63 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>“...by the physical universe” as if the physical universe has a mind of its own all of a sudden.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-63</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-73</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | When a man is unable to contact the reality of the present or appreciate it, and when he cannot compute his own future and act upon that computation, that <b>man</b> is considered in varying degrees neurotic or psychotic. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | When a man is unable to contact the reality of the present or appreciate it and when he cannot compute his own future and act upon that computation, that <b>person</b> is considered in varying degrees neurotic or psychotic. | ||
| + | |}<br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN H – Sonic) == | == CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN H – Sonic) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 66 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-66</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-76</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 67 | + | | valign="top" | The case may have, however, so little sonic shut-off, valence trouble, and charge that clear sonic, just as it was heard in the first place, is available as the person travels on the time track, as well as <b>near present time</b>. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The case may have, however, so little sonic shut-off, valence trouble and charge that clear sonic (just as it was heard in the first place) is available as the person travels on the time track, as well as <b>in near-present time</b>. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | [“inane” already means that it “does not make sense” according to the very definition of the word.] | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-67</b> | |
| − | 1975: 67 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-77</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | These are very easy to spot, however, since dub-in sonic usually is inane. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | These are very easy to spot, however, since dub-in sonic usually is inane <b>and does not make sense</b>. | |
| − | [In addition to a missing phrase, notice how a change in punctuation from a comma to a period results in a loss of meaning: a clear connection between | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>“inane” already means that it “does not make sense” according to the very definition of the word.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | 1975: 69 | + | {| border="1" <br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-67</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-77</b> | |
| − | 1975: 69 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The dub-in sonic case, after it has been worked for a short time, can be expected to lose the <u>dub-in, once</u> the circuit causing it is contacted <b>or when the tone of the case rises</b>. A non-sonic case results.<br> | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The dub-in sonic case, after it has been worked for a short time, can be expected to lose the <u>dub-in. Once</u> the circuit causing it is contacted, a non-sonic case results.<br> | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | [“Belief” and “observation” are totally different concepts | + | [<i>In addition to a missing phrase, notice how a change in punctuation from a comma to a period results in a loss of meaning: a clear connection between losing a dub-in through contacting the circuit that is causing it is lost.</i>] <br><br><br> |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 71 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-69</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-79</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Looks like someone was getting confused here – a portion of the sentence “The tone of the individual goes up when running moments of pleasure” already communicated the fact that one's tone goes up from running “moments of pleasure existing in the past.” It does not need to be repeated in another arbitrarily added portion of text in a sentence.] | + | | valign="top" | This has misled practitioners <b>and authorities</b> in the past <b>into believing</b> that sonic recall was only to be found in idiots and morons, an entire falsity based on limited observation. |
| + | | valign="top" | This has misled practitioners <b>of the healing arts</b> in the past <b>to believe</b> that sonic recall was only to be found in idiots and morons— an entire falsity based on limited observation. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-69</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007</b><b>: B1-80</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The thinking on this subject in the past has been entirely too short. <b>The strange belief has been held in the past</b> that a great deal of aberration meant a great deal of thrust and drive and, therefore, that an individual who was neurotic could be expected to perform in the arts and in other directions m ore ably than a person who was sane. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The thinking on this subject in the past has been entirely too short. <b>The observation has been, in past schools,</b> that a great deal of aberration meant a great deal of thrust and drive and, therefore, that an individual who was neurotic could be expected to perform in the arts and in other directions more ably than a person who was sane. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>“Belief” and “observation” are totally different concepts!</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-71</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-82</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The running of future pleasure moments sometimes tunes up the perceptics. These are actually imaginary incidents, so far as can be told. The tone of the individual goes up when running moments of pleasure, and so when moments of pleasure in the future are imagined, the tone of any individual may be expected to rise. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The running of <i>future pleasure moments </i>sometimes tunes up the perceptics. These are actually imaginary incidents, so far as can be told. The tone of the individual goes up when running moments of pleasure and so<b> when moments of pleasure existing in the past are run or</b> when moments of pleasure in the future are imagined, the tone of any individual may be expected to rise. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Looks like someone was getting confused here – a portion of the sentence “The tone of the individual goes up when running moments of pleasure” already communicated the fact that one's tone goes up from running “moments of pleasure existing in the past.” It does not need to be repeated in another arbitrarily added portion of text in a sentence.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN I – Visio) == | == CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN I – Visio) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-75</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-86</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Such people ordinarily “run” <b>(undergo processing)</b> in Dianetics quite noisily and are called screamers. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Such people ordinarily run in Dianetics quite noisily and are called “screamers.” | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Without clarifying definition in parenthesis, “run” could definitely be misunderstood in 2007 text.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-77</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-88</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | In a case which has many valence shifters, affinity, reality and communication secondaries will bring about a chronic <b>exteriorized visio</b>. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | In a case which has many valence shifters, affinity, reality and communication secondaries will bring about a chronic <b>exteriorized visio case</b>. | ||
| + | |}<br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN J – Somatics) == | == CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN J – Somatics) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 79 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-79</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-91</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Grief is not always a mis-emotion. It is only a mis-emotion when it is not appropriate to the given circumstances. Also, notice how “correcting” punctuations went to the extent of resulting in INCORRECT GRAMMAR. “In short, anything physically uncomfortable.” is not a proper sentence since it does not contain a predicate which in itself must contain a verb – see any basic grammar materials for clarification.] | + | | valign="top" | The word <i>somatic </i>means, actually, <i>bodily </i>or <i>physical. </i>Because the word <i>pain </i>is restimulative, and because the word pain has in the past led to a confusion between physical pain and mental pain, the word somatic is used in Dianetics to denote physical pain or discomfort of any kind. It can mean actual pain, such as that caused by a cut or a blow; or it can mean discomfort, as from heat or cold; it can mean itching— in short, anything physically uncomfortable. It does not include mental discomfort such as grief. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The word <i>somatic </i>means, actually, “bodily or physical.” Because the word <i>pain </i>is restimulative and because the word pain has in the past led to a confusion between physical pain and mental pain, the word <i>somatic </i>is used, in Dianetics, to denote physical pain or discomfort of any kind. It can mean actual pain such as that caused by a cut or a blow. Or it can mean discomfort as from heat or cold. It can mean itching. <u>In short, anything physically uncomfortable.</u> It does not include mental discomfort such as grief, <b>which would be mis-emotion</b>. | |
| − | 1975: 83 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [Grief is not always a mis-emotion. It is only a mis-emotion when it is not appropriate to the given circumstances. Also, notice how “correcting” punctuations went to the extent of resulting in INCORRECT GRAMMAR. “In short, anything physically uncomfortable.” is not a proper sentence since it does not contain a predicate which in itself must contain a verb – see any basic grammar materials for clarification.]<br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [The word “extremely” was eliminated.] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-83</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-95</b> | |
| − | 1975: 83 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Around 1.1, the heavily occluded case will have no somatics available. The auditor must here work solely for the discharge of locks and secondaries before he can find somatics on the case. In the less occluded case, however, <b>some extremely light</b> somatics will be found available. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Around 1.1 the heavily occluded case will have no somatics available. The auditor must here work solely for the discharge of locks and secondaries before he can find somatics on the case. In the less occluded case, however, <b>some light</b> somatics will be found available. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | [The added sentence definitely jumps out like something that just doesn't quite belong, and indeed it was not there in the original text.] | + | [<i>The word “extremely” was eliminated.</i>] <br><br><br> |
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-83</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-95</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor should very thoroughly recognize somatics for what they are—the physical pain of past injuries. He should recognize, further, that it is the somatic, in the first place, which makes locks and secondaries possible. And he must further realize that somatics are buried beneath anaten and mis-emotion, when these are present. He must not believe, however, that just because somatics make locks and secondaries possible, his primary mission is to run somatics off the case, but where somatics are not easily available he must be very chary of trying to find them, and should devote himself to locks and secondaries rather than somatics. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor should very thoroughly recognize, then, somatics for what they are: the physical pain of past injuries. He should recognize further that it is the somatic, in the first place, which makes locks and secondaries possible. And he must further realize that somatics are buried beneath anaten and mis-emotion, when these are present. He must not believe, however, that just because somatics make locks and secondaries possible, his primary mission is to run somatics off the case. <b>Of course, he is trying to get the physical pain engrams off the case. </b>But where somatics are not easily available, he must be very chary of trying to find them and should devote himself to locks and secondaries rather than somatics. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>The added sentence definitely jumps out like something that just doesn't quite belong, and indeed it was not there in the original text.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN K – Speech, Talks Speech, Listens) == | == CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN K – Speech, Talks Speech, Listens) == | ||
| + | NONE PRESENTED <br><br><br> | ||
| − | NONE PRESENTED | + | == CHAPTER FOURTEEN (COLUMN L – Subject’s Handling of Written or Spoken Communication when Acting as a Relay Point) == |
| + | NONE PRESENTED <br><br><br> | ||
| − | + | == CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN M – Reality (Agreement)) == | |
| − | + | NONE PRESENTED <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN M – Reality (Agreement) == | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | NONE PRESENTED | + | |
== CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN N – Condition of Track and Valences) == | == CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN N – Condition of Track and Valences) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 106 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-106</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-121</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Who added this sentence?] | + | | valign="top" | Another difficulty on the track is the bouncer. The preclear may be in an engram and yet be bounced into present time. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Another difficulty on the time track is the <i>bouncer. </i><b>The bouncer always bounces the preclear up.</b> The preclear may be in an engram and yet be bounced into present time. | |
| − | 1975: 108 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Who added this sentence?</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [Here again someone decided to add one's own “clarification” by essentially paraphrasing what was already said in the previous sentence.] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-108</b> |
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-124</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | By charge, of course, is meant anger, fear, grief, or apathy <b>contained as mis-emotion</b> in the case. This form of entheta (there is other entheta, in the form of communication and reality secondaries, as well as mis-emotion secondaries) charges up the track so much that <b>the action phrases act</b>. The charge must be very heavy on a case before engram action phrases— action phrases contained in engrams themselves— can be active. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | By <i>charge, </i>of course, is meant anger, fear, grief or apathy <b>(mis-emotion) contained</b> in the case. This form of entheta (there is other entheta, in the form of communication and reality secondaries, as well as mis-emotion secondaries) charges up the track so much that <b>the action phrases become very active</b>. <b>It is charge which makes action phrases act. </b>The charge must be very heavy on a case before engram action phrases (action phrases contained in engrams themselves) can be active. <br> | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Here again someone decided to add one's own “clarification” by essentially paraphrasing what was already said in the previous sentence.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN O – Manifestation of Engrams and Locks) == | == CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN O – Manifestation of Engrams and Locks) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 110 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-110</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-125</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 111 | + | | valign="top" | This does not mean that a <b>Zulu</b> who has been cleared of all of his engrams would not continue to eat missionaries if he were a cannibal by <u>education; but</u> it does mean that he would be as rational as possible about eating missionaries; further, it would be easier to re-educate him about eating missionaries if he were a clear. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | This does not mean that a <b>primitive</b> who had been cleared of all of his engrams would not continue to eat missionaries if he were a cannibal by <u>education. But</u> it does mean that he would be as rational as possible about eating missionaries. Further, it would be easier to re-educate him about eating missionaries if he were a Clear. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | [Quite obviously, this book is not just about auditing. This additional phrase is completely inappropriate.] | + | |
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-111</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-127</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Much more could be written about human behavior and about the engram as the cause of aberrated behaviour, but what the auditor wishes to know is how to audit his pre-clear and how to find his pre-clear on this chart so that he will know what type of entheta to address in the case, whether to run engrams, secondaries, or locks, and how to run them. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Much could be written about human behavior and about the engram as the cause of aberrated behavior, <b>but this is a book about auditing.</b> What the auditor wishes to know is how to audit his preclear and how to find his preclear on this chart so that he will know what type of entheta to address in the case, whether to run engrams, secondaries or locks, and how to run them. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Quite obviously, this book is not just about auditing. This additional phrase is completely inappropriate.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN P – Sexual Behaviour, Attitude Toward Children) == | == CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN P – Sexual Behaviour, Attitude Toward Children) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 114 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-114</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-132</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [The insertion of “that” is completely inappropriate.] | + | | valign="top" | There is considerable confusion in the American and European cultures about sex; since there was so much perversion and promiscuity and maltreatment of <b>children the erroneous</b> conclusion was reached that the remedy for this lay in further regulation; whereas, in reality, it was the regulation which caused the derangement of the dynamic. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | There is considerable confusion in the American and European cultures about sex, since there was so much perversion and promiscuity and maltreatment of<b> children that the</b><b>erroneous</b> conclusion was reached that the remedy for this lay in further regulation, whereas, in reality, it was the regulation which caused the derangement of the dynamic. | |
| − | 1975: 115 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>The insertion of “that” is completely inappropriate.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [To stop Free Love sounds quite nonsenical, and it was already included in the concept of immorality according to the logic in the paragraph.] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-115)</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-132)</b> | |
| − | 1975: 115 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | It will be noted, in observing the behaviour of human beings, and on this chart of the tone scale, that promiscuity, perversion, sadism, and irregular practices fall far down the line. Free Love falls, also, in this very low band; since man is relatively monogamous and since it is non-survival not to have a well ordered system for the creation and upbringing of children, by families. A society which falls into this 1.1 band of the tone scale can be expected to abuse sex, to be promiscuous, to misuse and maltreat children, and to act, in short, much in the way current cultures are acting. It is of vital importance, if one wishes <b>to stop immorality, and the abuse of children</b>, to de-aberrate this dynamic for the whole group of the society, to say nothing of individuals. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | It will be noted in observing the behavior of human beings and on this chart of the Tone Scale that promiscuity, perversion, sadism and irregular practices fall far down the line. Free Love falls also in this very low band, since Man is relatively monogamous and since it is non-survival not to have a well-ordered system for the creation and upbringing o f children by families. A society which falls into this 1.1 band of the Tone Scale can be expected to abuse sex, to be promiscuous, to misuse and maltreat children and to act, in short, much in the way current cultures are acting. It is of vital importance, if one wishes <b>to stop immorality, Free Love and the abuse of children</b>, to de-aberrate this dynamic for the whole group o f the society, to say nothing of individuals. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | [Notice how an addition of degrading labels shifts the emphasis from aberrated conduct at this tone level (which can be remedied with processing) to a sort of hatred of the actual people that may reside in this band. This unwelcome addition is already present in 2001 edition on page 145.] | + | [<i>To stop Free Love sounds quite nonsenical, and it was already included in the concept of immorality according to the logic in the paragraph.</i>] <br><br><br> |
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-115</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-133</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 1.1 on the tone scale we enter the area of the most vicious reversal of the second dynamic. Here we have promiscuity, perversion, sadism, and irregular practices. We have no enjoyment of the sex act, but a hectic anxiety about it. The sex act cannot truly be enjoyed whether performed regularly or irregularly. Here is Free Love, easy marriage and quick divorce, and general sexual disaster. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 1.1 on the Tone Scale we enter the area of the most vicious reversal of the Second Dynamic. Here we have promiscuity, perversion, sadism and irregular practices. We have <b>here </b>no enjoyment of the sex act, <b>actually</b>, but a hectic anxiety about it. The sex act cannot truly be enjoyed whether performed regularly or irregularly. <b>Here is the harlot, the pervert, the unfaithful wife, </b>Free Love, easy marriage and quick divorce and general sexual disaster. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Notice how an addition of degrading labels shifts the emphasis from aberrated conduct at this tone level (which can be remedied with processing) to a sort of hatred of the actual people that may reside in this band. This unwelcome addition is already present in 2001 edition on page 145.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN Q – Command Over Environment) == | == CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN Q – Command Over Environment) == | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-123</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-141</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | In today’s world, the next stop down the tone scale politically is the subversive, who belongs in the 1.1 to 1.3 bracket. Most theoretical subversion pretends to be very high on the tone scale, and so has had its appeal to the liberally inclined individual; but there is a wide gap between <b>theory and practice</b>, and the unthinking <b>person </b>confuses the theory with the practice. He finds himself keeping company with 1.1’s. Communication lines are cut; affinities are flagrantly used and perverted; reality is twisted; <b>the level of truth</b> as seen in <b>subversive propaganda</b>, compares with lowest gossip; and the treatment of human beings is without any regard to the respect an individual human being should have. <br><br> | ||
| + | Subversion receives its main support from such individuals as lie in the vicinity of 1.1, and the reason it gains so many volunteer agents in lands which it wishes to overrun lies in the desire of the 1.1 to have good cause and reason to flout flagrantly and place himself “above” existing morals and the laws of the land in which he operates. He gains through his warped philosophy a very fine excuse to believe himself above such things as law and decency, and it is very possibly this appeal alone which brings so many recruits to the ranks of<b> subversive organizations</b>. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | In today's world, the next stop down the Tone Scale, politically, is the subversive, who belongs in the 1.1 to 1.3 bracket. Most theoretical subversion pretends to be very high on the Tone Scale and so has had its appeal to the liberally inclined individual. But there is a wide gap between<b> theoretical and destructive liberalism</b>, and the unthinking <b>liberal</b> confuses the theory with the practice. He finds himself keeping company with 1.1s, <b>since an inspection of any brand of politics which oversweeps the world because of the general apathy of societies shows that it falls exactly into this position on the scale: </b>communication lines are cut; affinities are flagrantly used and perverted; reality is twisted; <b>the level of cabal</b>, as seen in <b>hate propaganda</b>, compares with lowest gossip; and the treatment of human beings is without any regard to the respect an individual human being should have. <b>Psychometry on subversives places them uniformly in this </b><b>1</b><b>.</b><b>1</b><b> bracket. They have no respect for the wit and sanity of anyone. They hold promiscuity as a high virtue. They have no belief in family. They are about as safe to have for friends as an adder—but probably this is unfair to the honest adder.</b><br><br> | ||
| + | Subversion receives its main support from such individuals as lie in the vicinity of 1.1. And the reason it gains so many volunteer agents in lands which it wishes to overrun, lies in the desire of the 1.1 to have “good cause” and “reason” to flaunt flagrantly and place himself “above” existing morals and the laws of the land in which he operates. He gains, through his warped philosophy, a very fine excuse to believe himself above such things as law and decency. And it is very possibly this appeal alone which brings so many recruits to <b>ruthless politics.</b> | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [How is this for an example of a 1.1 (subversive) at work? Notice how a great amount of hatred was (covertly) interjected into this text with the sentence on “Psychometry” and the following hateful generalizations with “They” which is in itself a vivid example of an expressed anti-social characteristic fully described in “Introduction to Scientology” book. These alterations can already be found in 2001 edition on pages 153 and 154.] <br><br><br> | ||
| − | + | == CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN R – Actual Worth To Society Compared To Apparent Worth) == | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-123</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-145</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | When it becomes perverted, men of money begin to be damned by a society and are sought out as the scapegoats for all its ills; whereas a goodly number of them are the very pivots on which the society is turning. <b>Subversive political movements </b>appeal to the indigence and poverty which is the lot, unfortunately, of a majority of populaces in these days of poorly advanced culture by promising to murder every man of property once a land is taken. The whole cult of <b>anti-Capitalism</b> is something less than a sound philosophic postulate and rather more than a gross appeal to those who have no property and no hope of attaining any. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | When it becomes perverted, men of money begin to be damned by a society and are sought out as the scapegoats for all its ills, whereas a goodly number of them are the very pivots on which the society is turning. <b>The subversive </b>appeals to the indigence and poverty which is the lot, unfortunately, of a majority of populaces (in these days of poorly advanced culture) by promising to murder every man of property once a land is taken. The whole cult of<b> anticapitalism</b> is something less than a sound philosophic postulate and rather more than a gross appeal to those who have no property and no hope of attaining any. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | == CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN R | + | |
| − | Actual Worth To Society Compared To Apparent Worth) | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-126</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-145</b> | |
| − | 1975: 123 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | In this column on the chart, anyone, regardless of his potential value, below the line of 2.0 as evaluated by other columns, has a negative value to the society. Anyone above this line goes in a positive direction. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | In this column on the chart, anyone (regardless of his potential value) below the line of 2.0, as evaluated by other columns, has a negative value to the society. Anyone above this line goes <b>from zero value upward</b> in a positive direction. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | 1975: 126 | + | [<i>It clearly stated in the previous sentence that it's from 2.0 not from “zero value.”</i>] <br><br><br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [It clearly stated in the previous sentence that it's from 2.0 not from “zero value.”] | + | |
== CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN S – Ethic Level) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN S – Ethic Level) == | ||
| − | + | NONE PRESENTED <br><br><br> | |
| − | NONE PRESENTED | + | |
== CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO (COLUMN T – The Handling of Truth) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO (COLUMN T – The Handling of Truth) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 133 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-133</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-155</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Notice a stark change in meaning of the phrase “absolute truth” when it is capitalized. There is no such thing as “Absolute Truth” that that can be uniquely identified – it is not a proper noun and therefore should not be capitalized.] | + | | valign="top" | The metaphysician was concerned with <b>absolute truth</b> and considered that it transcended the limits of human experience. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The metaphysician was concerned with <b>Absolute Truth</b> and considered that it transcended the limits of human experience. The social orders of his day must have been not much better than our own. | |
| − | 1975: 133 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Notice a stark change in meaning of the phrase “absolute truth” when it is capitalized. There is no such thing as “Absolute Truth” that that can be uniquely identified – it is not a proper noun and therefore should not be capitalized.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 133 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-133</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-155</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Few mothers there are who do not have untruths and imaginative postulates thoroughly confused, thus suppressing the necessary imaginative instincts of the child and, in fact, <b>burdening the child </b>with a confusion about the truth itself. | |
| − | 1975: 134 | + | | valign="top" | Few mothers there are who do not have untruths and imaginative postulates thoroughly confused, thus suppressing the necessary imaginative instincts of the child and <b>giving the child</b>, in fact, a confusion about the truth itself. |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [Also, note that the use of a semicolon is far more appropriate in this case since it requires a longer pause and is used with a list of related sentences where there is no conjunction expect at the very end (i.e. “and some prefer...”)] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-133</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-155</b> | |
| − | 1975: 135 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | There is an ethic about the handling of truth. While it may be true that something is <b>undesirable</b> or that a person is bad, if it serves <b>no good purpose</b> to make the statement, the issuance of this “truth” is in reality the establishing of an entheta line. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | There is an ethic about the handling of truth. While it may be true that something is <b>destructive</b> or that a person is bad, if it serves <b>no purpose</b> to make the statement, the issuance of this “truth” is in reality the establishing of an entheta line. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | [Here is a serious alteration in applying data presented in this chapter – notice how suggesting an auditor performs psychometry is in conflict with the following portion of the sentence stating that the auditor can locate pre-clear on the tone scale “simply by discovering the type of fact which the preclear likes best.” This alteration is in 2001 altered edition as well on page 169.] | + | {| border="1" <br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 135 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-134</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-156</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | In common human experience we all know something about the truth and we know that we cannot deal in a black and white breakdown between the truth and lies. Truth is concerned in the issuance and acceptance <b>of data about facts</b>. Some people favour <b>constructive</b><b>facts</b>; some favour facts which are not so <b>constructive</b>; some prefer to twist facts; some prefer to hide facts; and some prefer to he about facts. | |
| − | [Ron Hubbard's emphasis on “our society” is quite correct, since in many non-English speaking cultures there is no social practice of trying to “avoid hurting people's feelings.”] | + | | valign="top" | In common human experience, we all know something about the truth and that we cannot deal in a black and white breakdown between the truth and lies. Truth is concerned in the issuance and acceptance <b>of facts</b>. Some people favor <b>truthful</b><b>facts</b>, some favor facts which are not so <b>truthful</b>, some prefer to twist facts, some prefer to hide facts and some prefer to lie about facts. |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | 1975: 135 | + | [<i>Also, note that the use of a semicolon is far more appropriate in this case since it requires a longer pause and is used with a list of related sentences where there is no coordinating conjunction expect at the very end (i.e. “and some prefer...”)</i>] <br><br><br> |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-135</b> | |
| − | 1975: 137 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-157</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The auditor can locate his pre-clear on the tone scale simply by discovering the type of fact which the pre-clear likes best, or by discovering what the pre-clear does with facts. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The auditor can <b>do psychometry on his preclear</b> and locate him on the Tone Scale simply by discovering the type of fact which the preclear likes best or by discovering what the preclear does with facts. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | 1975: 137 | + | [Here is a serious alteration in applying data presented in this chapter – notice how suggesting an auditor performs psychometry is in conflict with the following portion of the sentence stating that the auditor can locate pre-clear on the tone scale “simply by discovering the type of fact which the preclear likes best.” This alteration is in 2001 altered edition as well on page 169.] <br><br><br> |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-135</b> | |
| − | [Also notice where it should have been a comma, the comma was removed.] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-157</b> |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 3.0 we begin to get an onset of conservatism, a cautiousness about receiving or uttering truths, and<b> in our society </b>a short-sighted programme of social lying in order to “avoid hurting people’s feelings.” | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 3.0 we begin to get an onset of conservatism, a cautiousness about receiving or uttering truths, and a shortsighted program of social lying in order to “avoid hurting people’s feelings.” | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Ron Hubbard's emphasis on “our society” is quite correct, since in many non-English speaking cultures there is no social practice of trying to “avoid hurting people's feelings.”</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-135</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-158</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 2.5 we have insincerity and carelessness of facts. The modern American newspaper exemplifies this level on the tone scale. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | At 2.5 we have insincerity and carelessness of facts. The modern American newspaper exemplifies this level on the Tone Scale <b>(or perhaps, the various magazines which could be named)</b>. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-137</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-159</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The 0.5 may be given sympathy, but <b>not</b> believed. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The 0.5 may be given sympathy, but <b>never</b> believed. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-137</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-159</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | He is an <b>everthirsty</b> sponge for<u> sympathy, and he</u> is a chronic potential suicide. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | He is an <b>unsaturable</b> sponge for <u>sympathy and he</u> is a chronic potential suicide. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Also notice where it should have been a comma, the comma was removed.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE (COLUMN U – Courage Level) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE (COLUMN U – Courage Level) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 140 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-140</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-163</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Oh, thanks for the added clarification... as if it is already not clear what is talked about from the surrounding sentences.] | + | | valign="top" | So far as courage level is concerned in auditing, any auditor must have the courage to take anything from the pre-clear and run a pre-clear through anything without quailing. A coward has no business in the auditor’s chair, and if he is so placed, the pre-clear can expect to have his case ruined. |
| − | + | | valign="top" | So far as courage level is concerned in auditing, any auditor must have the courage to take anything from a preclear and to run a preclear through anything without quailing. <b>Courage has a great deal to do with auditing. </b>A coward has no business in the auditors chair and if he is so placed, his preclear can expect to have his case ruined. | |
| − | 1975: 141 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Oh, thanks for the added clarification... as if it is already not clear what is talked about from the surrounding sentences.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [Oh, are they like dating or something?] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-141</b> |
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-164</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Shock and courage level are <b>immediately</b> connected. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Shock and courage level are <b>intimately</b> connected. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Oh, are they like dating or something?</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR (COLUMN V – Ability To Handle Responsibility) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR (COLUMN V – Ability To Handle Responsibility) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 145 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-145</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-168</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [Notice how changing verbs into past tense now doesn't agree with the present tense in the following sentence.] | + | | valign="top" | At tone 2.5, the individual is very careless and not trustworthy, although one may find that the individual <b>takes</b> good care of himself so far as his dress <b>is</b> concerned. He falls markedly short in his concept of what is required of him in order to maintain a high survival level. |
| + | | valign="top" | At Tone 2.5 the individual is very careless and not trustworthy, although one might find that the individual <b>took</b> good care of himself so far as his dress <b>was</b> concerned. He falls markedly short in his concept of what is required of him in order to maintain a high survival level. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Notice how changing verbs into past tense now doesn't agree with the present tense in the following sentence.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE (COLUMN W – Persistence On A Given Course) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE (COLUMN W – Persistence On A Given Course) == | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-148</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-171</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The individual who has sufficient theta endowment and sufficient structural ability to keep his free theta and his enturbulated theta relatively separate may have a good persistence level even when the factors and conditions in his environment are such that they continually hammer him away from his given course of action. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The individual who has sufficient theta endowment and sufficient structural ability to keep his free theta and his enturbulated theta relatively separate may <b>(but not always) </b>have a good persistence level even when the factors and conditions in his environment are such that they continually hammer him away from his given course of action. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-148</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-172</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The potential psychotic, on the other hand, is not very apt to have a goal in the first place but is apt to follow any <b>course</b> which comes into view, and then only so long as no environmental factor enters to make him deviate from that course. <br> | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The potential psychotic, on the other hand, is not very apt to have a goal in the first place, but is apt to follow any <b>goal</b> which comes into view and then only so long as no environmental factor enters to make him deviate from that course. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Now, it was already stated that a potential psychotic “is not very apt to have a goal” so to then state that he “is apt to follow any goal” is quite confusing to say the least.</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-149</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-172</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The individual may begin with a <b>highly</b> enthusiastic thrust and may through experience become less <b>active</b> and open about his creative and constructive efforts and may assume conservatism and caution. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The individual may begin with a <b>high</b> enthusiastic thrust and may, through experience, become less <b>blunt</b> and open about his creative and constructive efforts and may assume conservatism and caution. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-149</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-173</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | When a man has been defeated too often, <b>and</b> too many of his dreams have been broken, he sinks into the apathy band and thereafter no longer struggles toward his goal. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | When a man has been defeated too often, <b>when</b> too many of his dreams have been broken, he sinks into the apathy band and thereafter no longer struggles toward his goal. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-150</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-173</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | It is an observed fact that an individual’s attitude toward Dianetics and an individual’s attitude toward life in general are parallel. When the auditor takes a pre-clear who is at the apathy<u> level, all too</u> common in this present social order, he can expect the pre-clear to depend exclusively on the auditor for any persistence as to the processing of the case. <b>The auditor must take</b> the responsibility of doing the processing. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | It is an observed fact that an individual’s attitude toward Dianetics and an individual’s attitude toward life in general are parallel. <b>The better Dianetic processing can approximate the mechanics of the mind, the better that processing is: this is another parallel.</b><br><br> | ||
| + | When the auditor takes a preclear who is in the apathy <u>level all too</u> common in this present social order, he can expect the preclear to depend exclusively on the auditor for any persistence as to the processing of the case. <b>The auditor, incidentally, must take</b> the responsibility of doing the processing. | ||
| + | |}<br> | ||
| + | [<i>Also, notice how a very much needed comma was dropped reducing clarity of the sentence. And an auditor taking responsibility for processing is not an “incidental” factor – it is at the foundation of the entire practice!</i>] <br><br><br> | ||
| − | + | == CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX (COLUMN X – Literalness With Which Statements Or Remarks Are Received) == | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-153</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-177</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | <b>Rationalization</b> is, in essence, <u>differentiation; reacting</u> is, in essence, identification. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | <b>Rationalizing</b> is, in essence, <u>differentiation. Reacting</u> is, in essence, identification. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | + | [<i>Notice how replacing the semicolon with a period introduces a very unpleasant interruption in a continuous flow of the communicated concept.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX (COLUMN X | + | |
| − | Literalness With Which Statements Or Remarks Are Received) | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 153 | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [Notice how replacing the semicolon with a period introduces a very unpleasant interruption in a continuous flow of the communicated concept.] | + | |
== CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN (COLUMN Y – Method Used By Subject To Handle Others) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN (COLUMN Y – Method Used By Subject To Handle Others) == | ||
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 155 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-155</b> | |
| − | The unfortunate part of the conduct of the lower levels of the tone scale toward others is that it has as its invariable end the lowering of the tone of the family, associates, friends, and society of the subject. Yet the subject by no reason or education below the point of 2.0 could use any other means. Forcing the subject to use other means only drives him down the tone scale, and as he descends he uses the means of the lower levels to which he sinks. | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-181 </b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The methods of handling others could be assigned to three general categories. The highest category would be one of enhancement, where the individual seeks by example and good reasoning to lift the level of those around him to the point where they will partake of the projects of living with him. This would extend from 4.0 down to 3.0. The second category would be that of <b>punishment drive, or domination</b>. Here the individual uses alarm, threats, and the general promise of pain unless compliance is given by the others around him. This area extends from 2.0 to around 1.3. The third category is that of nullification, wherein the individual seeks to minimize individuals, to be more than they and so to be able to control them. This category would rather see a man sick than well, because sick men are less dangerous than well men according to the "thinking” that takes place in this band. <br><br> | |
| − | + | The unfortunate part of the conduct of the lower levels of the tone scale toward others is that it has as its invariable end the lowering of the tone of the family, associates, friends, and society of the subject. Yet the subject by no reason or education below the point of 2.0 could use any other <u>means. Forcing</u> the subject to use other means only drives him down the tone scale, and as he descends he uses the means of the <b>lower levels to which he sinks</b>. | |
| − | The second category would be that of punishment drive. Here the individual uses alarm, threats and the general promise of pain unless compliance is given by the others around him. This area extends from 2.0 to around 1.3. | + | | valign="top" | The methods of handling others could be assigned to three general categories. The highest category would be one of <i>enhancement,</i> where the individual seeks by example and good reasoning to lift the level of those around him to the point where they will partake of the projects of living with him. This would extend from 4.0 down to 3.0. <br><br> |
| − | + | The second category would be that of <i><b>punishment drive</b></i><i>.</i><b></b>Here the individual uses alarm, threats and the general promise of pain unless compliance is given by the others around him. This area extends from 2.0 to around 1.3. <br><br> | |
| − | The third category is that of nullification, wherein the individual seeks to minimize individuals to be more than they and so to be able to control them. This category would rather see a man sick than well, because sick men are less dangerous than well men according to the “thinking” that takes place in this band. | + | The third category is that of <i>nullification,</i> wherein the individual seeks to minimize individuals to be more than they and so to be able to control them. This category would rather see a man sick than well, because sick men are less dangerous than well men according to the “thinking” that takes place in this band. <br><br><b>Three other names for these areas would be <i>enhancement, domination</i> and <i>nullification.</i></b><br><br> |
| − | + | The unfortunate part of the conduct of the lower levels of the Tone Scale toward others is that it has as its invariable end the lowering of the tone of the family, associates, friends and society of the subject. Yet the subject by no reason or education (below the point 2.0) could use any other <u>means, forcing</u> the subject to use other means only drives him down the Tone Scale. And as he descends, he uses the means of the <b>lower levels he attains</b>. | |
| − | Three other names for these areas would be enhancement, domination and nullification. | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [Notice how the added sentence introduces some confusion since it gives not “other” but the same names that were already mentioned, except for “domination” since that word was dropped where “punishment drive” was first brought up in 2007 text. Also, notice how replacing period with a comma in “...means. Forcing...” results in an improper grammatical structure and could in itself result in a sense of a “crushing MU.” And, obviously, one does not “attain” lower levels – he “sinks” there.] <br><br><br> | |
| − | The unfortunate part of the conduct of the lower levels of the Tone Scale toward others is that it has as its invariable end the lowering of the tone of the family, associates, friends and society of the subject. Yet the subject by no reason or education (below the point 2.0) could use any other means, forcing the subject to use other means only drives him down the Tone Scale. And as he descends, he uses the means of the lower levels he attains. | + | {| border="1" <br> |
| − | + | ||
| − | [Notice how the added sentence introduces some confusion since it gives not “other” but the same names that were already mentioned, except for “domination” since that word was dropped where “punishment drive” was first brought up in 2007 text. Also, notice how replacing period with a comma in “...means. Forcing...” results in an improper grammatical structure and could in itself result in a sense of a “crushing MU.” And, obviously, one does not “attain” lower levels – he “sinks” there.] | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-156</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-183</b> | |
| − | 1975: 156 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The 3.5 in the vicinity of a 1.1 may find himself descending down the tone scale toward anger without any apparent reason. The 1.1’s efforts to nullify are so well veiled and so carefully calculated to annoy that <b>no target is available to the reason of the 3.5</b>. As reason fails, the 3.5, continually subjected to nullification which he cannot locate, will eventually become angry. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The 3.5 in the vicinity of a 1.1 may find himself descending down the Tone Scale toward anger without any apparent reason. The 1.1's efforts to nullify are so well veiled and so carefully calculated to annoy that <b>any target for correction or reason by the 3.5 is unavailable</b>. And as reason fails, the 3.5, continually subjected to nullification which he cannot locate, will eventually become angry. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | [And one wonders why there have been so many reports of aggression at the Church of Scientology. Look at who's in charge of it | + | [<i>And one wonders why there have been so many reports of aggression at the Church of Scientology. Look at who's in charge of it!</i>]<br><br><br> |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 160 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-160</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-</b><b>186</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | [David Miscavige is a prime example of this – providing “voluminous reasoning” for his covert destruction of L. Ron Hubbard's works.] | + | | valign="top" | At this level we have murder, by slow erosion, of individuals and the culture, <b>each harmful action </b>being masked with voluminous “reasoning.” |
| − | + | | valign="top" | At this level we have murder, by slow erosion of individuals and the culture, <b>and the actions </b>are masked with voluminous “reasoning.” | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | + | [<i>David Miscavige is a prime example of this – providing “voluminous reasoning” for his covert destruction of L. Ron Hubbard's works.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-161</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-188</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Hypnotism is used in some base religions, and is commonly employed i<b>n obsolete mental “therapies,”</b> which should make plain the level of <b>those</b> on the tone scale. | |
| − | 1975: 170 | + | | valign="top" | Hypnotism is used in some base religions and is commonly employed <b>by old schools of mental healing</b>, which should make plain the level of <b>these cults</b> on the Tone Scale. |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-162</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-189</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 172 | + | | These institutions often use sedatives, and yet one of the worst things that an individual who is in a disturbed state can be given is a sedative; it makes him quieter and less dangerous but <b>it also makes him less able</b>. |
| − | + | | These institutions often use sedatives and yet one of the worst things that an individual who is in a disturbed state can be given is a sedative. It makes him quieter and less dangerous, but <b>it does not make him more able</b>. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 172 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-163</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-189</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | From 1.3 down to 0.6 we have the general area of the subversive, who promises a people freedom and equality and gives them a slaughter of their best minds and cultural institutions, to the end of a totalitarian dominance. <b>Because subversion</b> exists in this tone band, the subversive leader can use as his personnel only people in this tone band; if this tone band were to be removed from a society he would have no recruits | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | From 1.3 down to 0.6 we have the general area of the subversive, who promises a people freedom and equality and gives them a slaughter of their best minds and cultural institutions, to the end of a totalitarian dominance. <b>Because it</b> exists in this tone band, the subversive leader can use as his personnel only people in this tone band. If this tone band were to be removed from a society, he would have no recruits. | |
| − | 1975: 173 | + | |}<br> |
| − | + | [<i>Having replaced “subversion” with “it” can make the reader conclude that “it” refers to “totalitarian dominance” just mentioned as opposed to “subversion.”</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-164</b> | |
| − | 1975: 174 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-190</b> |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Thus, immediately after a complete totalitarian conquest of a country we invariably witness an extensive slaughter of individuals. One can select with ease the individuals marked for liquidation in the <b>consolidation</b> of the conquest. The selection is not made according to the position the individual occupies but by his individualism, his strength, and his reasonableness, or by his continuing revolutionary desire not to conform to set and regimented patterns. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | Thus, immediately after a complete totalitarian conquest of a country, we invariably witness an extensive slaughter of individuals. One can select with ease the individuals marked for liquidation in the <b>solidation</b> of conquest. The selection is not made according to the position the individual occupies, but by his individualism, his strength and his reasonableness, or by his continuing revolutionary desire not to conform to set and regimented patterns. | |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | 1975: 174 | + | [<i>“Solidation” is not even a valid word.</i>] <br><br><br> |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-164</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-190</b> | |
| − | 1975: 175 | + | |- |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The 1.1 may take a 1.1 as a bedfellow and political mate and <b>may form a 1.1 group</b>, but this group has to continue to be faced by a strong and dangerous foe to remain consolidated. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The 1.1 may take a 1.1 as a bedfellow and political mate and <b>may take a 1.1 group</b>, but this group has to continue to be faced by a strong and dangerous foe to remain consolidated. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | 1975: 176 | + | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-165</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-192</b><b></b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | <b>The 1</b><b>.1 will twist </b><b>past experiences in the telling, reporting cruelty where there was only abruptness. </b>The apathy case will declare all past kindnesses to have been the most sadistic cruelties and the cruelties to have been kindnesses. | |
| − | 1975: 176 | + | | valign="top" | <b>If the 1.1 is considered to have manifestations of one kind and motives and actions of an entirely different kind, then the apathy case is a direct reversal. </b>The apathy case will declare all past kindnesses to have been the most sadistic cruelties and the cruelties to have been kindnesses. |
| − | + | |}<br> | |
| − | + | [<i>Here a sentence was changed entirely – obviously, the individual who was “correcting” this book did not want other people to be as clear on the nature of persons at this tone level.</i>] <br><br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 178 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-166</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-192</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The apathy case talks about death, threatens personal death, and will actually attempt suicide. There is not enough courage on this level usually <b>to attempt openly</b> the death of others, but by enturbulation the apathy case can effect this and will do so if not understood. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | The apathy case talks about death, threatens personal death and will actually attempt suicide. There is not enough courage on this level <b>to forthrightly attempt</b> the death of others, but by enturbulation the apathy case can effect this and will do so if not understood. | |
| − | 1975: 179 | + | |- |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-167</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-193</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | Auditors, and indeed a society, not understanding the true motives of apathy are placed in considerable peril since a natural <b>desire</b> exists in the higher levels of the tone scale to aid and support one’s fellows. The apathy case is actually perverting and destroying this <b>desire</b> by inviting it toward unworthy causes. | |
| − | 1975: 179 | + | | Auditors and, indeed, a society not understanding the true motives of apathy are placed in considerable peril, since a natural <b>mechanism</b> exists in the higher levels of the Tone Scale to aid and support one’s fellows. The apathy case is actually perverting and destroying this <b>mechanism</b> by inviting it toward unworthy causes. |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-167</b> | |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-194</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | 1975: 179 | + | | As courage is absent, the apathy case will dodge any incident which contains real <b>force</b>, just as the apathy case will dodge any factor in the environment which contains real help or aid and will go inevitably toward environmental factors which are destructive. |
| − | + | | As courage is absent, the apathy case will dodge any incident which contains real <b>impact</b>, just as the apathy case will dodge any factor in the environment which contains real help or aid and will go inevitably toward environmental factors which are destructive. | |
| − | + | |}<br><br> | |
| − | + | {| border="1" <br> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | 1975: 180 | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-167</b> |
| − | + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-195</b> | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | And because a <b>narrative</b> can be given forth by the apathy case wild and alarming enough to justify his condition, one is often tempted to accept this propitiation as actual affinity, when actually it is an invitation to be killed. | |
| − | + | | valign="top" | And because <b>justification</b> can be given forth by the apathy case, wild and alarming enough to justify his condition, one is often tempted to accept this propitiation as actual affinity when, actually, it is an invitation to be killed. | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-169</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-196</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | One should be extremely chary of using <b>any authoritarian </b><b>or violent means</b> on cases from 2.0 down, since such cases are very easily driven into the apathy level. | ||
| + | | One should be extremely chary of using<b> authoritarian auditing, any violent means or hypnotism</b> on cases from 2.0 down, since such cases are very easily driven into the apathy level. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-170</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-197</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | This is the reason why there are so many suicides pursuant to the practice of hypnotism and other <b>crude techniques</b>. | ||
| + | | This is the reason why there are so many suicides pursuant to the practice of hypnotism and <b>old-school techniques</b>. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-170</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-197</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor should be warned not to employ any authoritarian methods in processing. We in Dianetics are only interested in raising people on the tone scale. The auditor should be careful not to enturbulate persons below the 2.0 line any further than they already are, but should be as non-directive as possible. For, if the auditor permits his pre-clear to drop into apathy he has on his hands a much more difficult and much longer case than a 1.1 or a forthrightly howlingly angry 1.5. <br> | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor should be warned not to employ any authoritarian methods in processing. We in Dianetics are only interested in raising people on the Tone Scale<b> and are not at all concerned with psychosis, neurosis or psychosomatic illnesses</b>. The auditor should be careful not to enturbulate persons below the 2.0 line any further than they already are, but should be as non-directive <b>in approach</b> as possible <b>to produce results</b>. For if the auditor permits his preclear to drop into apathy, he has on his hands a much more difficult and a much longer case than a 1.1 or a forthrightly howlingly angry 1.5. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-172</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-199</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | The pretended death case has come to a point where he considers die environment so fraught with menace that nothing in the environment has any intent save to kill him and that death is <b>immediate</b>. | ||
| + | | The pretended death case has come to a point where he considers the environment so fraught with menace that nothing in the environment has any intent save to kill him and that death is <b>imminent</b>. <br> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-172</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-199</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | The pretended death case has abandoned even trying to find any one menace and considers everything a menace. This state has the peculiarity of being unfixed. Possibly the most signal effect to rouse this case can be made by concentrating the attention of the individual upon a single and definite threat of death. Indeed, observing an honest and active source of death <b>raises</b> the necessity level and brings anyone up the tone scale at least for a brief time. | ||
| + | | The pretended death case has abandoned even trying to find any one menace and considers everything a menace. This state has the peculiarity of being unfixed. Possibly the most signal effect to rouse this case can be made by concentrating the attention of the individual upon a single and definite threat of death. Indeed, observing an honest and active source of death, <b>by raising</b> the necessity level, brings anyone up the Tone Scale at least for a brief time. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-173</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-200</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | But the purposes are crossed, since individuals from 2.0 up do not <b>wish</b> to be made to succumb and will combat any effort in that direction. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | But the purposes are crossed, since individuals from 2.0 up do not <b>want</b> to be made to succumb and will combat any effort in that direction. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-174</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-200</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | It is worthy of note that the environment of the individual <b>has</b> its own position on the tone scale. | ||
| + | | It is worthy of note that the environment of the individual <b>may have</b> its own position on the Tone Scale. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-174</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-201</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | The environment impacting upon the individual thus alters free theta “permanently” into frozen <u>entheta, but</u> this is a gradual process, cumulative and deadly though it may be. | ||
| + | | The environment impacting upon the individual thus alters “permanently” <b>(except for Dianetic processing)</b> free theta into frozen <u>entheta. But</u> this is a gradual process, cumulative and deadly though it may be. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-</b><b>175</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-202</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | If the quantity of free theta remaining to him is great he will rather rapidly unenturbulate and regain his <b>high</b> position on the tone scale. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | If the quantity of free theta remaining to him is great, he will rather rapidly unenturbulate and regain his <b>higher</b> position on the Tone Scale. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-176</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-203</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | We are interested in Dianetics in what has been done to an individual, not what the individual has done. This is not an effort to escape or alter moral standards but is simply a statement of <u>fact; the</u> auditor who becomes interested in his pre-clear’s motives <b>and makes evaluations </b>of his pre-clear’s reasoning is not only wasting his time but is trying to perform authoritarian therapy. | ||
| + | | We are interested, in Dianetics, in what has been done to an individual, not what the individual has done. This is not an effort to escape or alter moral standards, but is simply a statement of <u>fact. The</u> auditor who becomes interested in his preclear’s motives <b>and evaluations</b> of his preclear’s reasoning is not only wasting his time, but is trying to perform authoritarian therapy. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-176</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-205</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | By treating childhood alone, out of the mistaken reasoning that it was a highly aberrative period (an aberration which was planted by amateur philosophers and <b>therapists</b> half a century ago), one sends the pre-clear against the occluding force of the late locks and secondaries without giving him a chance to reduce them. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | By treating childhood alone, out of the mistaken reasoning that it was a highly aberrative period (an aberration which was planted by amateur philosophers and <b>schools of mental healing</b> half a century ago), one sends the preclear against the occluding force of the late locks and secondaries without giving him a chance to reduce them. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-178</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-205</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | This is along the educational line and is best cleared up by picking up the instruction closest to present time and lock-scanning it thoroughly, then picking up an earlier period of instruction such as college, then picking up an earlier one such as high school, then an earlier one such as grammar school, and finally parental training. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | This is along the educational line and is best cleared up by picking up the instruction closest to present time and Lock Scanning it thoroughly, then picking up an earlier period of instruction such as college, then picking up an earlier one such as high school, then an earlier one such as grammar school and, finally, parental training <b>as being the same general type of lock chain</b>. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-179</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-206</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | <b>It is a question whether</b> any pre-clear exists in the civilized world today who has been educated by a system above 2.0 on the tone scale. | ||
| + | | <b>It is highly doubtful that </b>any preclear exists in the civilized world today who has been educated by a system above 2.0 on the Tone Scale. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-179</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-207</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Association with persons low on the tone scale is always depressing, and a long and continuous association creates <b>many severe locks</b>. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | Association with persons low on the Tone Scale is always depressing and a long and continuous association creates <b>many and severe locks</b>. | ||
| + | |}<br><br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1975: B1-179</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 2007: B1-207</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor would do well to examine his own general method of handling people with a highly critical eye and adjudicate for himself where his auditing is likely to lie on the <u>tone scale, and</u> by the educational process of knowing the consequences and <b>knowing how to get results</b>, simply raise his necessity level up to a point where he achieves a more desirable attitude, if he thinks one is necessary. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | The auditor would do well to examine his own general method of handling people, with a highly critical eye, and adjudicate for himself where his auditing is therefore likely to lie on the <u>Tone Scale. And</u> by the educational process of knowing the consequences and <b>know-how to get results</b>, simply raise his necessity level up to a point where he achieves a more desirable attitude if he thinks one is necessary. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1975: B1-180</b> | ||
| + | | align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007: B1-207</b> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | <b>Two persons can co-audit each other</b>, step by step up the <u>tone scale, but unless</u> a parity is maintained, one of them will suffer, and a good release or a clear will be impossible to attain— which is thought to be the difficulty so far experienced in Dianetics, where the making of clears is concerned. | ||
| + | | valign="top" | <b>As an emergency measure, where none other is available, two persons can co-audit each other</b> step by step up the <u>Tone Scale. But unless</u> a parity is maintained, one of them will suffer and a good Release or a Clear will be impossible to attain—-which is thought to be the difficulty so far experienced in Dianetics, where the making of Clears is concerned. | ||
| + | |}<br><br><br> | ||
== CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT (COLUMN Z – Command Value of Action Phrases) == | == CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT (COLUMN Z – Command Value of Action Phrases) == | ||
| − | + | NONE PRESENTED<br><br><br> | |
| − | NONE PRESENTED | + | |
= BOOK TWO = | = BOOK TWO = | ||
Revision as of 06:08, August 11, 2013
| Science of Survival - Alterations | |
|---|---|
| |
| Topic | Science of Survival Alterations |
| Author | L Ron Hubbard |
| Type of Article | Category: "Category:" cannot be used as a page name in this wiki.
|
| Website | http://www.truebasics.x10.mx/5106_SOS/alter_SOS.html |
| info@scientolipedia.org | |
L Ron Hubbard's Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
and Scientology books have been altered from his original writings and publications, and not for the better - the proof is in this and related articles attached.
Contents
- 1 The Goal of Dianetics
- 2 Publisher's Introduction
- 3 Introduction
- 4 BOOK ONE
- 4.1 CHAPTER ONE (COLUMN A – The Tone Scale)
- 4.2 CHAPTER TWO (COLUMN B – Dianetic Evaluation)
- 4.3 CHAPTER THREE (COLUMN C Physiology and Behavior)
- 4.4 CHAPTER FOUR (COLUMN D – Psychiatric Range)
- 4.5 CHAPTER FIVE (COLUMN E – Medical Range)
- 4.6 CHAPTER SIX (The Basic Laws of Theta Affinity - Reality - Communication)
- 4.7 CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN F – Emotion)
- 4.8 CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN G – Affinity)
- 4.9 CHAPTER NINE (Communication and Reality)
- 4.10 CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN H – Sonic)
- 4.11 CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN I – Visio)
- 4.12 CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN J – Somatics)
- 4.13 CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN K – Speech, Talks Speech, Listens)
- 4.14 CHAPTER FOURTEEN (COLUMN L – Subject’s Handling of Written or Spoken Communication when Acting as a Relay Point)
- 4.15 CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN M – Reality (Agreement))
- 4.16 CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN N – Condition of Track and Valences)
- 4.17 CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN O – Manifestation of Engrams and Locks)
- 4.18 CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN P – Sexual Behaviour, Attitude Toward Children)
- 4.19 CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN Q – Command Over Environment)
- 4.20 CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN R – Actual Worth To Society Compared To Apparent Worth)
- 4.21 CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN S – Ethic Level)
- 4.22 CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO (COLUMN T – The Handling of Truth)
- 4.23 CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE (COLUMN U – Courage Level)
- 4.24 CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR (COLUMN V – Ability To Handle Responsibility)
- 4.25 CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE (COLUMN W – Persistence On A Given Course)
- 4.26 CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX (COLUMN X – Literalness With Which Statements Or Remarks Are Received)
- 4.27 CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN (COLUMN Y – Method Used By Subject To Handle Others)
- 4.28 CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT (COLUMN Z – Command Value of Action Phrases)
- 5 BOOK TWO
- 5.1 CHAPTER ONE (The Basic Principles of Processing)
- 5.2 CHAPTER TWO (The Auditor’s Code)
- 5.3 CHAPTER THREE (The Mechanics of Aberration)
- 5.4 CHAPTER FOUR (The Dynamics of Existence)
- 5.5 CHAPTER FIVE (General Description of Processing)
- 5.6 CHAPTER SIX (COLUMN AB – Present Time)
- 5.7 CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN AC – Straight Memory)
- 5.8 CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN AD – Pleasure Moments)
- 5.9 CHAPTER NINE (COLUMN AE – Imaginary Incidents)
- 5.10 CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN AF – Locks)
- 5.11 CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN AG - Scanning Locks)
- 5.12 CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN AH – Secondary Engrams)
- 5.13 CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN AI – Engrams)
- 5.14 CHAPTER FOURTEEN (COLUMN AJ – Chains of Engrams)
- 5.15 CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN AK – Circuits)
- 5.16 CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN AL – Condition of File Clerk)
- 5.17 CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN AM – Hypnotic Level)
- 5.18 CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN AN – Level of Mind Alert)
- 5.19 CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN AO – Relative Entheta On Case)
- 5.20 CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN AQ – Tone Level of Auditor Necessary To Handle Case)
- 5.21 CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN AR – How To Audit The Case)
- 6 related pages
| |
| 1970's Publication | 2007 Publication |
Comparing 15th printing (1975) of the original 1951 edition copyrighted under L. Ron Hubbard [ISBN 0-88404-001-1] to 2007 altered edition copyrighted under “L. Ron Hubbard Library” [ISBN 978-1-4031-4485-0]
Please, keep in mind3. a network of communications and pictures, energies and masses, which are brought into being by the activities of the thetan versus the physical universe or other thetans. The mind is a communication and control system between the thetan and his environment. (FOT, p. 56)...MORE
the statements made by David Miscavige with respect to “correcting” the original text when he released his 2007 version of Science of Survival at the Basics release event in 2007:
“The chart of human evaluation is not only the primary tool of a casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)
supervisor, but the theta-MEST1. a coined word, meaning matter, energy, space and time, the physical universe. All physical phenomena may be considered as energy operating in space and time. The movement of matter or energy in time is the measure of space. All things are mest except theta. (Abil 114-A)...More
theory and the tone scale5. a scale which plots the descending spiral of life from full vitality and consciousness through half-vitality and half-consciousness down to death. (SA, p . 3 7 )...More
is the basis of our entire Grade Chart! In other words, to say the book is important would be a gross understatement.”
...
“When Science of Survival was published it was presented with a subtitle of 'Simpler and Faster Techniques.' If that's the casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)
, then how come so many find it so complex?”
...
“This too was a dictated book. And since the transcriptionist and the editor were the first to touch this book, the very book defining the various tone levels, it then follows that they were also the first one one (1.1) since the tone level was discovered. And here is what I mean – they were so indecisive they really didn’t know where to begin or end the sentence, specifically, here is where they weren’t sure if it should be a comma or a period and so they split the difference and used a semicolon [presenting animated example of a page on the screen getting populated with semicolons, not a photocopy from an actual book] which a good percentage of readers never understood in the first place. And given one semicolon begets another, it wasn't long before it was the march of the semicolons frustrating readers and lengthening lines to word clearers from one end of Scientology to another.
Not that I want to overstate the matter or bad mouth somebody who was trying, but when you consider that even when they didn't use their multitudes of semicolons, they still started sentence in the wrong place, and when you further consider that when the book was returned to its original and intended form, it reads with a simplicity of a Self-Analysis – it really does bare comment. So let me put it this way: yes, this book too is now perfect; and the number of incorrect instances of punctuations that had to be corrected – hang on to your seat – three thousand eight hundred and twenty five (3825). So yes, you were right, something just didn't make sense.
[audience standing up and clapping]
Whereupon what more is there to say? Students were previously spending weeks upon weeks digging their way through this book, perhaps “suffering” is a better word; and yet many students currently on a pilot program are completing this 550 page book in as little as 22 hours. Even if you double or triple that time you are still looking at one tenth (1/10th) previous times.
So for the first time you have LRHL. Ron Hubbard's text as he originally intended providing the very basics of the Tone Scale, The Basic Laws of Theta1. theta is thought, life force, elan vital, the spirit, the soul, or any other of the numerous definitions it has had for some thousands of years. (SOS, p. 4)...More
– ARC1. a word from the initial letters of Affinity, Reality, Communication which together equate to Understanding. It is pronounced by stating its letters, A-R- C. To Scientologists it has come to mean good feeling, love or friendliness, such as “He was in ARC with his friend.” One does not, however, fall out of ARC, he has an ARC break. (LRH Def. Notes)...more
, including their interaction on the tone scale5. a scale which plots the descending spiral of life from full vitality and consciousness through half-vitality and half-consciousness down to death. (SA, p . 3 7 )...More
, and so it goes chapter by chapter. For any who have ever had difficulty with the book, it's now so clear – you will actually wonder where the confusion ever was. Because the book is that simple – JUST as LRHL. Ron Hubbard wrote it.”
You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address: http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html
The segment about Science of Survival starts at 57:17 time marker of the video.
4th printing (same year as first publication in 1951) of the original text was also available for this review and is sometimes referred to in comments on alterations. It has not been compared on lineThe military type of organization form whereby there is a definite ascending and descending chain of command. Orders pass from top management down the line of command and compliances and data pass on up without by-passing the chain of command. (Modern Management Defined (c) L. Ron Hubbard, 1976)
by lineThe military type of organization form whereby there is a definite ascending and descending chain of command. Orders pass from top management down the line of command and compliances and data pass on up without by-passing the chain of command. (Modern Management Defined (c) L. Ron Hubbard, 1976)
basis, but on cursory inspection of the text in the 4th printing it looks exactly the same as the text in the 15th printing which would make sense.
In addition, an earlier - 2001 - version of an already altered edition of "Science of Survival" was also acquired for the purpose of determining the total time frame that the parishioners and staff at the Church of Scientology were exposed to the massive alterations that can be found in 2007 text. Not all alterations cited below have been verified against the 2001 edition, but more serious alterations were looked up and in most cases were found to be already present in 2001 edition. Where it has been verified, it was noted in the comments that such alteration is or is not present in 2001 edition. Where it is not noted, it is safe to just assume that such an alteration can already be found in 2001 edition of the altered text. This particularly applies to contextual alterations, not to alterations in punctuation.
What this means is that those Scientologists that studied "Science of Survival" beginning with 2001 edition had their minds populated with "crushing MU's," and as many Scientologists familiar with study technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech
know that this can lead to a variety of undesirable phenomena including: lack of comprehension, inability to apply, confusion and strange ideas, committing overts (harmful acts), and blowing from the subject altogether. And this is just ONE book out of a pile of other materials that could have been and probably were altered in various ways.
To aid the ease of analysis, alterations in "Science of Survival" can be separated in four major categories:
Alterations in CAPITALIZATION
Alterations in SPELLING
Alterations in PUNCTUATION / SENTENCE STRUCTURE
Alterations in WORDING
Some key terms relating to grammar should be cleared before reading this report: sentence, subject, verb; coordinating conjunction; participle adjective; the use of a comma, a period, a semicolon, parenthesis and a dash in punctuation.
Note! Boldformatting in citations was added to highlight key areas of alteration.Key areas of punctuation will be underlined.Square brackets - [ ] - were used to insert comment where needed. With a few exceptions comments will also appear in italics, but italics formatting inside the quotations is original formatting of how it appeared in the book from where it was quoted.
Many dianetic terms have been capitalized which were not capitalized in the original text:
Dianetic, Dianetically, Dianetic Release3. a person who has been able to back out of his bank. The bank is still there but the person isn't sunk into it with all its somatics and depressions. (HCOB 2 Apr 65) 6. a series of gradual key-outs. At any given one of those key-outs the individual detaches from the remainder of his reactive bank. (SH
Spec 65, 6507C27)...More
, Release3. a person who has been able to back out of his bank. The bank is still there but the person isn't sunk into it with all its somatics and depressions. (HCOB 2 Apr 65) 6. a series of gradual key-outs. At any given one of those key-outs the individual detaches from the remainder of his reactive bank. (SH
Spec 65, 6507C27)...More
, Clear3. a Clear is not an all-knowing being. A Clear is somebody who has lost the mass, energy, space and time connected with the thing called mind . ( SH Spec 80, 6609C08) ...more
, Tone Scale, Tone, Straight Memory, Lock Scanningone contacts an early lock on the track and goes rapidly or slowly through all such similar incidents straight to present time. One does this many times and the whole chain of locks become ineffective in influencing one. (HFP, pp. 99-100)
, Lock Scan, Lock Scanned, Lock Reduction, Chain Scanning, Repeater Technique, Affinity, Reality, and Communication, First through Seventh Dynamic, Auditor’s Code, Repeater Technique, Theta-MEST1. a coined word, meaning matter, energy, space and time, the physical universe. All physical phenomena may be considered as energy operating in space and time. The movement of matter or energy in time is the measure of space. All things are mest except theta. (Abil 114-A)...More
Theory, Standard Procedure, Positive Processing.
The word “clear” was capitalized into absurdity of having it capitalized where it did not even mean the state of clear as in “Clear3. a Clear is not an all-knowing being. A Clear is somebody who has lost the mass, energy, space and time connected with the thing called mind . ( SH Spec 80, 6609C08) ...more
-thinking”:
2007: B2-267) Well, Clear3. a Clear is not an all-knowing being. A Clear is somebody who has lost the mass, energy, space and time connected with the thing called mind . ( SH Spec 80, 6609C08) ...more
-thinking, strong individuals are highly necessary in this society at this time.
Word “clear” was also improperly capitalized where it served as a participle adjective “cleared”:
2007: B2-382) The auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more
, thus, must be compatible with the preclear1. a person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. a spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. one who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 63) ''Abbr.'' PC
and must have been Cleared with the preclear1. a person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. a spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. one who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 63) ''Abbr.'' PC
(as a group of two) if he expects to runUndergo processing. (Science of Survival, p.75)
any secondary engrams on this preclear1. a person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. a spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. one who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 63) ''Abbr.'' PC
.
Some other terms not directly related to Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
were capitalized as well:
Absolute Truth, Forced of Good, Forces of Evil, Devil, Communism, Man, Mankind, Mama and Papa.
It is interesting to note that while the word “devil” was capitalized in instances where it was not capitalized in the original text, the word “Godless” was de-capitalized where it was capitalized in the original text.
Many words which were originally spelled using proper British spelling were changed into American spelling format. The following is a list of words that were noted to have been changed in spelling. There could be more examples in text:
Favour > favor; behaviour > behavior; endeavour > endeavor; amongst > among; skilfully > skillfully; honour > honor; analyser > analyzer; sanatorium > sanitarium; theatre > threater; anaesthetic > anesthetic; labelled > labeled; odour > odor; mould > mold; centre > center; programme > program; towards > toward; favourite > favorite; pretence > pretense; judgement > judgment; odour > odor; paralyse > paralyze; criticising > criticizing.
Many numbers that were written in words were changed to number format such as “seventy” to “70.”
There were also changes in the use of a hyphen in either adding or removing it such as in the following examples:
A-R-C > ARC1. a word from the initial letters of Affinity, Reality, Communication which together equate to Understanding. It is pronounced by stating its letters, A-R- C. To Scientologists it has come to mean good feeling, love or friendliness, such as “He was in ARC with his friend.” One does not, however, fall out of ARC, he has an ARC break. (LRH Def. Notes)...more
; pre-clear > preclear1. a person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. a spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. one who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 63) ''Abbr.'' PC
; psycho-surgery > psychosurgery; psycho-therapist > psychotherapist; coaudit > co-auditThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
; nonsurvival > non-survival; un-enturbulate > unentrubulate
At the center stage of changes in punctuation is breaking down joined sentences often resulting in a very much unwanted dispersal of conceptual concentration and an unpleasant read.
Many sentences that were joined with a coordinating conjunction (and, but, for, etc) and a comma were broken down with a period. Examples:
Some sentences with a coordinating conjunction were broken down where there was not even a punctuation mark such as a comma or a semicolon requiring a pause. Examples:
| 1975: B1-13 | 2007: B1-15 |
| The result is that when he is in a restimulative environment he may be covertly hostile but in a more favourable environment he may be analytically very productive. |
The result is that when he is in a restimulative environment, he may be covertly hostile. But in a more favorable environment, he may be analytically very productive. |
[Also, notice two additional commas requiring a pause where there doesn’t need to be one.]
Few sentences that were originally separated with a period were combined instead. Examples:
[Here replacing period with a comma between “newsprint” and “it” resulted in a grammatical error called “comma splice.” See more explanation on this and the use of a semicolon in a separate section below.]
Many sentences that were joined with a semicolon with or without a coordinating conjunction were broken down with a period (see “MORE ON THE USE OF A SEMICOLON” section for examples).
The indiscriminate breaking down of sentences extended into a total absurdity of resulting in sentences that are grammatically incorrect:
[“Then to grief” is an incomplete sentence since it does not contain a verb and is just a continuation of the concept being expressed in the preceding sentence.]
[Notice how in the original sentence a semicolon was skillfully used to connect related sentences in a more continuous flow1. an impulse or direction of energy particles or thought or masses between terminals. (HCOB 3 Feb 69)...more
of thought – this was broken up with periods in the “corrected” 2007 version. In addition, “in Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
” was surrounded by commas where it did not need to be, and “in short, anything physically uncomfortable” was separated into its own sentence resulting in incorrect grammar since it does not contain a verb.]
Here is another clear example:
[Here “And will assert more reality, but will actually have less” is not a correct sentence because it does not contain a subject. The comma between “less” and “and” was used in the original text as a matter of style and not to separate two sentences joined with a coordinating conjunction as usually the casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)
. Also, there is no need for a pause between “reality” and “but” so there was no need to have a comma in that place.]
MORE ON THE USE OF A SEMICOLON
Let’s look at Miscavige’s claim with respect to the use a semicolon a little closer:
“…they [transcriptionist and the editor] were so indecisive they really didn’t know where to begin or end the sentence, specifically, here is where they weren’t sure if it should be a comma or a period and so they split the difference and used a semicolon…”
First of all, there was no “they.” The author of the book is L. Ron Hubbard. Second, this utterly absurd statement should make one wonder – does David Miscavige himself understand the use of a semicolon in sentences or even the grammatical construct of sentences in general? It is quite obvious from the ample examples provided in this report that this man, who never published a single book in his life, must himself lack some very basic education to say the least.
So what are the rules for using a semicolon? This can be easily answered by anyone with Internet access and some ability to read. Some good resources for understanding the use of a semicolon:
http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/semicolon
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/semicolons.asp
http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Semicolons.html (you can also use this website for definition of terms: independent clause, coordinating conjunctions, conjunctive adverbs, and transitional phrases).
General rule: “The main task of the semicolon is to mark a break that is stronger than a comma but not as final as a full stop. It’s used between two main clauses that balance each other and are too closely linked to be made into separate sentences.” [1]:
More specific use: “Use a semicolon between two independent clauses that are connected by conjunctive adverbs or transitional phrases.” [2]:
Another specific use: “Use a semicolon between independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction if the clauses are already punctuated with commas or if the clauses are lengthy.” [3]:
Grammatical error: “Both parts of the sentence are independent clauses, and commas should not be used to connect independent clauses if there is no coordinating conjunction. This mistake is known as a comma splice.” [4]:
MISLEADING USE OF PARENTHESIS
Parenthesis are commonly used in sentences to include optional text that clarifies something in the sentence but is not considered essential, meaning – if you read the sentence without the text in parenthesis, it is still a complete communication1. the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a distance to receipt point with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the source point. (HCOB 5 Apr 73)...more
. There are quite a number of cases throughout 2007 "Science of Survival" where phrases within sentences were surrounded with parenthesis erroneously communicating to readers that the text now enclosed in parenthesis is an optional addition and non-essential instead of being an inseparable part of the sentence. Here are a few examples:
| 1975: B1-49 | 2007: B1-56 |
| Being emotional, however, would indicate, if the emotionality agreed with current circumstances, a rational state of being. |
Being emotional, however, would indicate (if the emotionality agreed with current circumstances) a rational state of being. |
[The sentence means something entirely different without the text that was enclosed in parenthesis here.]
[There is absolutely nothing optional about the text that was enclosed in parenthesis in this sentence.]
Examples of misusing parenthesis like the few above are abundant throughout the text – at least a few in nearly every chapter. Alterations in punctuation overall however are so abundant that it would be an overwhelming task to even just count every single occurrence. Miscavige did say 3825 – he wasn't kidding.
The Goal of Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
- Notice how even a barely noticeable change of a verb from past to present tense results in a material alteration of the meaning conveyed by the author.
- Obviously, since the Publisher's Introduction (the following chapter of 23 pages in 1975 printing) presenting casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)
studies demonstrating Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
' effectiveness was eliminated from 2007 “edition” (it was already not there in 2001 altered edition), the sentence letting readers know that there was indeed such a document in the book also had to go.
- Yes indeed, and that would include stopping the practice by populating its materials with subversive alterations.
Publisher's Introduction
This section was deleted entirely from 2007 and 2001 editions.
Introduction
| 1975: xxxiv | 2007: vi |
|---|---|
| Simply reading this book then, although it contains all the basic information, does not qualify an individual to practice professionally. But once he has thoroughly studied this book, he should be able to handle routine cases without difficulty. | Simply reading this book, then, although it contains all the pertinent information, does not qualify an individual to practice professionally. But once he has thoroughly studied this book, he should be able to handle routine cases without difficulty. |
| 1975: xxxv | 2007: vii |
| You can’t drive anybody mad with Dianetic processing. Cases driven mad by Dianetic processing do not exist. Cases do exist where reversed techniques have been criminally used on persons. | You can’t drive anybody mad with standard Dianetic processing. You can make people somewhat unhappy. Cases driven mad by Dianetic processing do not exist. Cases do exist where reversed techniques have been criminally used on persons. |
- A completely new sentence was arbitrarily added here.
BOOK ONE
CHAPTER ONE (COLUMN A – The Tone Scale)
- Notice an example of breaking down a sentence “...therapies. And...” The last sentence does not appear in 1975 15th printing nor in 1951 4th printing of the original text, but it does already appear in 2001 altered edition.
- This alteration can already be found in 2001 edition.
- “Rises” is the correct word to use, not “raises” - see noun definitions in Oxford dictionary:
- Last two sentences urging readers to overthrow an “entheta1. means enturbulated theta (thought or life); especially refers to communications, which, based on lies and confusions, are slanderous, choppy or destructive in an attempt to overwhelm or suppress a person or group. (Scn AD) 2. theta which has been confused and chaotically mixed with the material universe and which will lie in this confusion until death or some other process disenturbulates it. Theta, below 2.0 on the tone scale, we call entheta. (SOS, p. 41) 3. anger, sarcasm, despair, slyly destructive suggestions. (HTLTAE, p. 88)
” government does not appear in 1975 15th printing nor in 1951 4th printing, but it does appear in 2001 altered edition.]
CHAPTER TWO (COLUMN B – Dianetic Evaluation)
| 1975: B1-19 | 2007: B1-22 |
| The use of the term “average” or “normal” is susceptible to considerable misunderstanding. It simply means the average of the population’s intelligence and ability. It is remarkably low in the United States compared to what it could be. But the United States’ average is considerably higher than that, for instance, of Panama. | The use of the term “average” or “normal” is susceptible to considerable misunderstanding. It simply means the average of the population’s intelligence and ability. It is remarkably low in the United States compared to what it could be, but the United States’ average is considerably higher than that of other nations. |
CHAPTER THREE (COLUMN C Physiology and Behavior)
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER FOUR (COLUMN D – Psychiatric Range)
[Who is the author of the additional text? These alterations were already present in 2001 edition.]
CHAPTER FIVE (COLUMN E – Medical Range)
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER SIX (The Basic Laws of Theta1. theta is thought, life force, elan vital, the spirit, the soul, or any other of the numerous definitions it has had for some thousands of years. (SOS, p. 4)...More
Affinity - Reality - Communication)
| 1975: B1-36 | 2007: B1-42 |
| We have thought of evolution in the past as something stretched back along the eons, as a graduated scale of various species which changed as the ages progressed down to our present life forms. | We have thought of evolution in the past as something stretched out back down the eons, as a graduated scale of various species which changed as the ages progressed down to our present life forms. |
[Here is a great example of how a small change in word results in a substantial change in meaning.]
[Word “depress” cannot even be used in the way it is used in 2007 text.]
[The two sentences defining the Eighth Dynamic were not written by L. Ron Hubbard. This text does not appear even in 2001 altered edition. How exactly does one survive “through” the Supreme Being? And in the second sentence “One could consider...” - this sounds completely arbitrary. One can consider many things – they do not suddenly become formal definitions of key terms in the science of Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
!
The ONLY place where a definition for the Eighth Dynamic appears in the original text of Science of Survival is in the Publisher's Introduction – the very section that was not included in either 2001 or 2007 altered versions of the book. The definition went as follows:
1975: xi) Dynamic eight is the urge toward survival as a part of or ward of a Supreme Being. The number eight, laid on its side, gives us the symbol -∞- for infinity.
Even a more precise definition of the Eighth Dynamic is given in the original Fundamentals of Thought book:
1975: 38) “THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as Infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. It is carefully observed here that the scienceof Scientology does not intrude into the Dynamic of the Supreme Being. This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the INFINITY or GOD DYNAMIC.”
Note, the sentence in bold does not appear in the corresponding text of 2007 altered edition of Fundamentals of Thought. For more information on alterations in this book, see a <a href="../5609_FOTFundamentals of Thought - book, by L Ron Hubbard
/alter_FOTFundamentals of Thought - book, by L Ron Hubbard
.html" target="_blank">separate alterations report</a>.]
CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN F – Emotion)
[Here is a perfect example of how a skilled use of a semicolon demonstrating author's extensive experience as a writer was “corrected” by replacing it with a period which results in poor grammar and an unpleasant interruption of the smooth flow1. an impulse or direction of energy particles or thought or masses between terminals. (HCOB 3 Feb 69)...more
of author's thought.]
[How is this for a "correction"?]
CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN G – Affinity)
| 1975: B1-56 | 2007: B1-64 |
| Around 2.5 the individual begins to neglect his own person, or people in general. | Around 2.5 the individual begins to neglect persons or people in general. |
[Here “his own person” means himself.]
| 1975: B1-57 | 2007: B1-65 |
| For instance, the rejected sweetheart reaching this level of grief may invent all manner of odd and peculiar incidents of cruelty on the part of the last lover in order to win the sympathy of those around her. | For instance, the rejected sweetheart, reaching this level of grief, may invent all manner of odd and peculiar incidents of cruelty on the part o f the past lover in order to win the sympathy of those around her. |
[Notice how replacing “past” for “last” noticeably reduces clarity of the sentence.]
[How is this for generating some confusion which is already present in 2001 edition? Hey, at least “rise” was not changed to “raise” in this sentence.]
CHAPTER NINE (Communication and Reality)
| 1975: B1-59 | 2007: B1-69 |
| It might be said that we have potentially a sensory reception mechanism for every type of sense message which can be radiated or delivered to us from the physical universe, and from the theta universe. | It might be said that we have, potentially, a sensory reception mechanism for every type of sense message which can be radiated or delivered to us by the physical universe and from the theta universe |
[“...by the physical universe” as if the physical universe has a mind3. a network of communications and pictures, energies and masses, which are brought into being by the activities of the thetan versus the physical universe or other thetans. The mind is a communication and control system between the thetan and his environment. (FOT, p. 56)...MORE
of its own all of a sudden.]
| 1975: B1-63 | 2007: B1-73 |
| When a man is unable to contact the reality of the present or appreciate it, and when he cannot compute his own future and act upon that computation, that man is considered in varying degrees neurotic or psychotic. | When a man is unable to contact the reality of the present or appreciate it and when he cannot compute his own future and act upon that computation, that person is considered in varying degrees neurotic or psychotic. |
CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN H – Sonic)
| 1975: B1-67 | 2007: B1-77 |
| These are very easy to spot, however, since dub-in sonic usually is inane. | These are very easy to spot, however, since dub-in sonic usually is inane and does not make sense. |
[“inane” already means that it “does not make sense” according to the very definition of the word.]
[In addition to a missing phrase, notice how a change in punctuation from a comma to a period results in a loss of meaning: a clear connection between losing a dub-in through contacting the circuit1. a part of an individual’s bank that behaves as though it were someone or something separate from him and that either talks to him or goes into action of its own accord, and may even, if severe enough, take control of him while it operates. A tune that keeps going around in someone’s head is an example of a circuit. (NOTL Gloss)...more
that is causing it is lost.]
| 1975: B1-69 | 2007: B1-79 |
| This has misled practitioners and authorities in the past into believing that sonic recall was only to be found in idiots and morons, an entire falsity based on limited observation. | This has misled practitioners of the healing arts in the past to believe that sonic recall was only to be found in idiots and morons— an entire falsity based on limited observation. |
| 1975: B1-69 | 2007: B1-80 |
| The thinking on this subject in the past has been entirely too short. The strange belief has been held in the past that a great deal of aberration meant a great deal of thrust and drive and, therefore, that an individual who was neurotic could be expected to perform in the arts and in other directions m ore ably than a person who was sane. | The thinking on this subject in the past has been entirely too short. The observation has been, in past schools, that a great deal of aberration meant a great deal of thrust and drive and, therefore, that an individual who was neurotic could be expected to perform in the arts and in other directions more ably than a person who was sane. |
[“Belief” and “observation” are totally different concepts!]
[Looks like someone was getting confused here – a portion of the sentence “The tone of the individual goes up when running moments of pleasure” already communicated the fact that one's tone goes up from running “moments of pleasure existing in the past.” It does not need to be repeated in another arbitrarily added portion of text in a sentence.]
CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN I – Visio)
[Without clarifying definition in parenthesis, “runUndergo processing. (Science of Survival, p.75)
” could definitely be misunderstood in 2007 text.]
CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN J – Somatics)
[Grief is not always a mis-emotion5. emotion could be called the energy manifestation of affinity. As used in Dn, emotion could be called the index of the state of being. In the English language, “emotional” is often considered synonymous with “irrational.” This would seem to assume that if one is emotional one cannot be reasonable. No more unreasonable assumption could possibly be made. (SOS, p. 48)...more
. It is only a mis-emotion5. emotion could be called the energy manifestation of affinity. As used in Dn, emotion could be called the index of the state of being. In the English language, “emotional” is often considered synonymous with “irrational.” This would seem to assume that if one is emotional one cannot be reasonable. No more unreasonable assumption could possibly be made. (SOS, p. 48)...more
when it is not appropriate to the given circumstances. Also, notice how “correcting” punctuations went to the extent of resulting in INCORRECT GRAMMAR. “In short, anything physically uncomfortable.” is not a proper sentence since it does not contain a predicate which in itself must contain a verb – see any basic grammar materials for clarification.]
[The word “extremely” was eliminated.]
[The added sentence definitely jumps out like something that just doesn't quite belong, and indeed it was not there in the original text.]
CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN K – Speech, Talks Speech, Listens)
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER FOURTEEN (COLUMN L – Subject’s Handling of Written or Spoken Communication when Acting as a Relay Point)
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN M – Reality (Agreement))
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN N – Condition of Track and Valences)
[Who added this sentence?]
[Here again someone decided to add one's own “clarification” by essentially paraphrasing what was already said in the previous sentence.]
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN O – Manifestation of Engrams and Locks)
[Quite obviously, this book is not just about auditingThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
. This additional phrase is completely inappropriate.]
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN P – Sexual Behaviour, Attitude Toward Children)
[The insertion of “that” is completely inappropriate.]
[To stop Free Love sounds quite nonsenical, and it was already included in the concept of immorality according to the logic in the paragraph.]
[Notice how an addition of degrading labels shifts the emphasis from aberrated conduct at this tone level (which can be remedied with processing) to a sort of hatred of the actual people that may reside in this band. This unwelcome addition is already present in 2001 edition on page 145.]
CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN Q – Command Over Environment)
[How is this for an example of a 1.1 (subversive) at work? Notice how a great amount of hatred was (covertly) interjected into this text with the sentence on “Psychometry” and the following hateful generalizations with “They” which is in itself a vivid example of an expressed anti-social characteristic fully described in “Introduction to Scientology” book. These alterations can already be found in 2001 edition on pages 153 and 154.]
CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN R – Actual Worth To Society Compared To Apparent Worth)
| 1975: B1-123 | 2007: B1-145 |
| When it becomes perverted, men of money begin to be damned by a society and are sought out as the scapegoats for all its ills; whereas a goodly number of them are the very pivots on which the society is turning. Subversive political movements appeal to the indigence and poverty which is the lot, unfortunately, of a majority of populaces in these days of poorly advanced culture by promising to murder every man of property once a land is taken. The whole cult of anti-Capitalism is something less than a sound philosophic postulate and rather more than a gross appeal to those who have no property and no hope of attaining any. | When it becomes perverted, men of money begin to be damned by a society and are sought out as the scapegoats for all its ills, whereas a goodly number of them are the very pivots on which the society is turning. The subversive appeals to the indigence and poverty which is the lot, unfortunately, of a majority of populaces (in these days of poorly advanced culture) by promising to murder every man of property once a land is taken. The whole cult of anticapitalism is something less than a sound philosophic postulate and rather more than a gross appeal to those who have no property and no hope of attaining any. |
[It clearly stated in the previous sentence that it's from 2.0 not from “zero value.”]
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN S – Ethic Level)
NONE PRESENTED
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO (COLUMN T – The Handling of Truth)
| 1975: B1-133 | 2007: B1-155 |
| The metaphysician was concerned with absolute truth and considered that it transcended the limits of human experience. | The metaphysician was concerned with Absolute Truth and considered that it transcended the limits of human experience. The social orders of his day must have been not much better than our own. |
[Notice a stark change in meaning of the phrase “absolute truth” when it is capitalized. There is no such thing as “Absolute Truth” that that can be uniquely identified – it is not a proper noun and therefore should not be capitalized.]
| 1975: B1-134 | 2007: B1-156 |
| In common human experience we all know something about the truth and we know that we cannot deal in a black and white breakdown between the truth and lies. Truth is concerned in the issuance and acceptance of data about facts. Some people favour constructivefacts; some favour facts which are not so constructive; some prefer to twist facts; some prefer to hide facts; and some prefer to he about facts. | In common human experience, we all know something about the truth and that we cannot deal in a black and white breakdown between the truth and lies. Truth is concerned in the issuance and acceptance of facts. Some people favor truthfulfacts, some favor facts which are not so truthful, some prefer to twist facts, some prefer to hide facts and some prefer to lie about facts. |
[Also, note that the use of a semicolon is far more appropriate in this casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63)
since it requires a longer pause and is used with a list of related sentences where there is no coordinating conjunction expect at the very end (i.e. “and some prefer...”)]
[Here is a serious alteration in applying data presented in this chapter – notice how suggesting an auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more
performs psychometry is in conflict with the following portion of the sentence stating that the auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more
can locate pre-clear on the tone scale5. a scale which plots the descending spiral of life from full vitality and consciousness through half-vitality and half-consciousness down to death. (SA, p . 3 7 )...More
“simply by discovering the type of fact which the preclear1. a person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. a spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. one who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 63) ''Abbr.'' PC
likes best.” This alteration is in 2001 altered edition as well on page 169.]
| 1975: B1-135 | 2007: B1-157 |
| At 3.0 we begin to get an onset of conservatism, a cautiousness about receiving or uttering truths, and in our society a short-sighted programme of social lying in order to “avoid hurting people’s feelings.” | At 3.0 we begin to get an onset of conservatism, a cautiousness about receiving or uttering truths, and a shortsighted program of social lying in order to “avoid hurting people’s feelings.” |
[Ron Hubbard's emphasis on “our society” is quite correct, since in many non-English speaking cultures there is no social practice of trying to “avoid hurting people's feelings.”]
| 1975: B1-137 | 2007: B1-159 |
| He is an everthirsty sponge for sympathy, and he is a chronic potential suicide. | He is an unsaturable sponge for sympathy and he is a chronic potential suicide. |
[Also notice where it should have been a comma, the comma was removed.]
CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE (COLUMN U – Courage Level)
[Oh, thanks for the added clarification... as if it is already not clear what is talked about from the surrounding sentences.]
| 1975: B1-141 | 2007: B1-164 |
| Shock and courage level are immediately connected. | Shock and courage level are intimately connected. |
[Oh, are they like dating or something?]
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR (COLUMN V – Ability To Handle Responsibility)
| 1975: B1-145 | 2007: B1-168 |
| At tone 2.5, the individual is very careless and not trustworthy, although one may find that the individual takes good care of himself so far as his dress is concerned. He falls markedly short in his concept of what is required of him in order to maintain a high survival level. | At Tone 2.5 the individual is very careless and not trustworthy, although one might find that the individual took good care of himself so far as his dress was concerned. He falls markedly short in his concept of what is required of him in order to maintain a high survival level. |
[Notice how changing verbs into past tense now doesn't agree with the present tense in the following sentence.]
CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE (COLUMN W – Persistence On A Given Course)
| 1975: B1-148 | 2007: B1-171 |
| The individual who has sufficient theta endowment and sufficient structural ability to keep his free theta and his enturbulated theta relatively separate may have a good persistence level even when the factors and conditions in his environment are such that they continually hammer him away from his given course of action. | The individual who has sufficient theta endowment and sufficient structural ability to keep his free theta and his enturbulated theta relatively separate may (but not always) have a good persistence level even when the factors and conditions in his environment are such that they continually hammer him away from his given course of action. |
| 1975: B1-148 | 2007: B1-172 |
| The potential psychotic, on the other hand, is not very apt to have a goal in the first place but is apt to follow any course which comes into view, and then only so long as no environmental factor enters to make him deviate from that course. |
The potential psychotic, on the other hand, is not very apt to have a goal in the first place, but is apt to follow any goal which comes into view and then only so long as no environmental factor enters to make him deviate from that course. |
[Now, it was already stated that a potential psychotic “is not very apt to have a goal” so to then state that he “is apt to follow any goal” is quite confusing to say the least.]
| 1975: B1-149 | 2007: B1-172 |
| The individual may begin with a highly enthusiastic thrust and may through experience become less active and open about his creative and constructive efforts and may assume conservatism and caution. | The individual may begin with a high enthusiastic thrust and may, through experience, become less blunt and open about his creative and constructive efforts and may assume conservatism and caution. |
| 1975: B1-149 | 2007: B1-173 |
| When a man has been defeated too often, and too many of his dreams have been broken, he sinks into the apathy band and thereafter no longer struggles toward his goal. | When a man has been defeated too often, when too many of his dreams have been broken, he sinks into the apathy band and thereafter no longer struggles toward his goal. |
[Also, notice how a very much needed comma was dropped reducing clarity of the sentence. And an auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more
taking responsibility for processing is not an “incidental” factor – it is at the foundation of the entire practice!]
CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX (COLUMN X – Literalness With Which Statements Or Remarks Are Received)
| 1975: B1-153 | 2007: B1-177 |
| Rationalization is, in essence, differentiation; reacting is, in essence, identification. | Rationalizing is, in essence, differentiation. Reacting is, in essence, identification. |
[Notice how replacing the semicolon with a period introduces a very unpleasant interruption in a continuous flow1. an impulse or direction of energy particles or thought or masses between terminals. (HCOB 3 Feb 69)...more
of the communicated concept.]
CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN (COLUMN Y – Method Used By Subject To Handle Others)
[Notice how the added sentence introduces some confusion since it gives not “other” but the same names that were already mentioned, except for “domination” since that word was dropped where “punishment drive” was first brought up in 2007 text. Also, notice how replacing period with a comma in “...means. Forcing...” results in an improper grammatical structure and could in itself result in a sense of a “crushing MU.” And, obviously, one does not “attain” lower levels – he “sinks” there.]
[And one wonders whyThat basic outness found which will lead to a recovery of stats. (HCO PL 13 Oct 70 II)
there have been so many reports of aggression at the Church of Scientology. Look at who's in charge1. harmful energy or force accumulated and stored within the reactive mind, resulting from the conflicts and unpleasant experiences that a person has had. Auditing discharges this charge so that it is no longer there to affect the individual. (Scn AD)..more
of it!]
| 1975: B1-160 | 2007: B1-186 |
| At this level we have murder, by slow erosion, of individuals and the culture, each harmful action being masked with voluminous “reasoning.” | At this level we have murder, by slow erosion of individuals and the culture, and the actions are masked with voluminous “reasoning.” |
[David Miscavige is a prime example of this – providing “voluminous reasoning” for his covert destruction of L. Ron Hubbard's works.]
| 1975: B1-163 | 2007: B1-189 |
| From 1.3 down to 0.6 we have the general area of the subversive, who promises a people freedom and equality and gives them a slaughter of their best minds and cultural institutions, to the end of a totalitarian dominance. Because subversion exists in this tone band, the subversive leader can use as his personnel only people in this tone band; if this tone band were to be removed from a society he would have no recruits | From 1.3 down to 0.6 we have the general area of the subversive, who promises a people freedom and equality and gives them a slaughter of their best minds and cultural institutions, to the end of a totalitarian dominance. Because it exists in this tone band, the subversive leader can use as his personnel only people in this tone band. If this tone band were to be removed from a society, he would have no recruits. |
[Having replaced “subversion” with “it” can make the reader conclude that “it” refers to “totalitarian dominance” just mentioned as opposed to “subversion.”]
| 1975: B1-164 | 2007: B1-190 |
| Thus, immediately after a complete totalitarian conquest of a country we invariably witness an extensive slaughter of individuals. One can select with ease the individuals marked for liquidation in the consolidation of the conquest. The selection is not made according to the position the individual occupies but by his individualism, his strength, and his reasonableness, or by his continuing revolutionary desire not to conform to set and regimented patterns. | Thus, immediately after a complete totalitarian conquest of a country, we invariably witness an extensive slaughter of individuals. One can select with ease the individuals marked for liquidation in the solidation of conquest. The selection is not made according to the position the individual occupies, but by his individualism, his strength and his reasonableness, or by his continuing revolutionary desire not to conform to set and regimented patterns. |
[“Solidation” is not even a valid word.]
| 1975: B1-164 | 2007: B1-190 |
| The 1.1 may take a 1.1 as a bedfellow and political mate and may form a 1.1 group, but this group has to continue to be faced by a strong and dangerous foe to remain consolidated. | The 1.1 may take a 1.1 as a bedfellow and political mate and may take a 1.1 group, but this group has to continue to be faced by a strong and dangerous foe to remain consolidated. |
[Here a sentence was changed entirely – obviously, the individual who was “correcting” this book did not want other people to be as clear on the nature of persons at this tone level.]
CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT (COLUMN Z – Command Value of Action Phrases)
NONE PRESENTED
BOOK TWO
CHAPTER ONE (The Basic Principles of Processing)
CHAPTER TWO (The Auditor’s Code)
[Being “embraced by the Auditor’s Code” sounds quite convoluted to say the least.]
CHAPTER THREE (The Mechanics of Aberration1. a departure from rational thought or behavior. From the Latin, aberrare, to wander from; Latin, ab, away, errare, to wander. It means basically to err, to make mistakes, or more specifically to have fixed ideas which are not true. The word is also used in its scientific sense. It means departure from a straight line...more
)
[Word “perceptically” should not have been placed in quotations since the word is used in its literal meaning.]
[Perceived THROUGH is correct as action is not performed by perceptions themselves, it is performed by theta through the various perceptions.]
CHAPTER FOUR (The Dynamics of Existence)
CHAPTER FIVE (General Description of Processing)
[Ron Hubbard did not write "ANY processing" here.]
[Where did this additional data come from?]
[Where did “shooting and quick burial” phrase come from? Ron Hubbard did not write this, and this does not present him in a very favorable light to say the least. How does it even relate to the discussion of PROCESSING someone below 2.0?]
[In this instance whole two sentences were replaced with an entirely different one.]
[Here, a noun “therapists” was replaced with a pronoun “they,” but since “therapists” was not mentioned in any immediate earlier text, “they” would be connected to “antiquated therapies” instead.]
[The inserted word “certainly” is completely out of place in this sentence.]
CHAPTER SIX (COLUMN AB – Present Time)
[Word “attacking” was dropped leaving a “hole” in the sentence.]
| 1975: B2-57 | 2007: B2-279 |
| One could not actually be stuck in present time but is stuck somewhere on the track in an incident which carries with it the illusion that it is present time. | No one could actually be stuck in present time, but is stuck somewhere on the track in an incident which carries with it the illusion that it is present time. |
[“Recall by straight memory” is a continuous phrase that did not need to be interrupted by commas. The added sentence may be an incorrect advice. Who added all these new sentences into the book?]
CHAPTER SEVEN (COLUMN AC – Straight Memory)
| 1975: B2-66 | 2007: B2-291 |
| The release through recall of any incident which is forgotten or hidden and which contains considerable turbulence will produce a tone rise in the individual. | The release through recall of any incident which is forgotten, hidden or off the track, and which contains considerable turbulence, will produce a tone rise in the individual. |
[What does “or off the track” even mean apart from “hidden?”]
[Where did this data in the additional sentence come from?]
[Do readers really need this “clarification” of what a lock is after it was already thoroughly defined earlier in the book?]
| 1975: B2-77 | 2007: B2-302 |
| Communication breaks, on the inhibition side, stem from the denial of a person’s ability to see, to feel, to hear, denial of a person’s right to talk or listen — in other words, denials of a person’s right to communicate. | Communication breaks on the inhibition side stem from the denial of a person’s ability to see, to feel, to hear, to be, denial of a person’s rights to talk or listen. In other words, denials of a person’s right to communicate. |
[“To be” doesn’t belong in this list as beingness is something that encompasses communication1. the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a distance to receipt point with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the source point. (HCOB 5 Apr 73)...more
, not the other way around.]
CHAPTER EIGHT (COLUMN AD – Pleasure Moments)
[Here is another example of someone “correcting” this book not wanting readers to be clear about the nature of this tone level.]
[Who is the author of this additional sentence?]
[Auditors do not “advise.”]
2007: B2-328) POSITIVE PROCESSING
[In 1975 book Positive Processing section is in Chapter 21 – How To Audit The Case.]
CHAPTER NINE (COLUMN AE – Imaginary Incidents)
[“Mad-dogism” what?!]
CHAPTER TEN (COLUMN AF – Locks)
[Here is a major alteration of actual application of Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
methodology.]
CHAPTER ELEVEN (COLUMN AG - Scanning Locks)
["Book-auditedThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
" is defined in the glossary of 2007 edition as: "recieved auditingThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
based on techniques contained in the book Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more
: The Modern Science of Mental Health."]
CHAPTER TWELVE (COLUMN AH – Secondary Engrams)
[There is a BIG difference between “dull” and “cut off.”]
CHAPTER THIRTEEN (COLUMN AI – Engrams)
[Notice how the inserted sentence essentially paraphrases the last one.]
[Here a portion of technical application was dropped.]
[The added sentence seems completely out of place.]
[How is this change for better “clarity?”]
2007: B2-430) UNBURDENING ENGRAMS
[In 1975 book Unburdening Engrams section is in Chapter 21 – How To Audit The Case.]
CHAPTER FOURTEEN (COLUMN AJ – Chains of Engrams)
CHAPTER FIFTEEN (COLUMN AK – Circuits)
[This is a footnote covering “self-auditingThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
.” Notice the difference of communicated message between 1975 footnote and 2007.]
CHAPTER SIXTEEN (COLUMN AL – Condition of File Clerk)
[Engrams are already included in the definition of entheta1. means enturbulated theta (thought or life); especially refers to communications, which, based on lies and confusions, are slanderous, choppy or destructive in an attempt to overwhelm or suppress a person or group. (Scn AD) 2. theta which has been confused and chaotically mixed with the material universe and which will lie in this confusion until death or some other process disenturbulates it. Theta, below 2.0 on the tone scale, we call entheta. (SOS, p. 41) 3. anger, sarcasm, despair, slyly destructive suggestions. (HTLTAE, p. 88)
. Saying “entheta1. means enturbulated theta (thought or life); especially refers to communications, which, based on lies and confusions, are slanderous, choppy or destructive in an attempt to overwhelm or suppress a person or group. (Scn AD) 2. theta which has been confused and chaotically mixed with the material universe and which will lie in this confusion until death or some other process disenturbulates it. Theta, below 2.0 on the tone scale, we call entheta. (SOS, p. 41) 3. anger, sarcasm, despair, slyly destructive suggestions. (HTLTAE, p. 88)
and engrams” is confusing because it separates out “engrams” as something separate from the concept of entheta1. means enturbulated theta (thought or life); especially refers to communications, which, based on lies and confusions, are slanderous, choppy or destructive in an attempt to overwhelm or suppress a person or group. (Scn AD) 2. theta which has been confused and chaotically mixed with the material universe and which will lie in this confusion until death or some other process disenturbulates it. Theta, below 2.0 on the tone scale, we call entheta. (SOS, p. 41) 3. anger, sarcasm, despair, slyly destructive suggestions. (HTLTAE, p. 88)
.]
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN (COLUMN AM – Hypnotic Level)
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN (COLUMN AN – Level of Mind Alert)
[This is not a joke. Look it up in 2007 book.]
CHAPTER NINETEEN (COLUMN AOAbbreviation for Advanced Org. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976). Organization whose function is to run the Clearing and OT Courses. (FO 1151)
– Relative Entheta On Case)
[“Request” sounds authoritarian and authoritarian auditingThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)
is not good.]
[“Marked” already means apparent so adding “apparent” in front of it is quite redundant.]
CHAPTER TWENTY (COLUMN AQ – Tone Level of Auditor Necessary To Handle Case)
[Definition of “conversely”: introducing a statement or idea that reverses one that has just been made or referred to. (<a target="_blank" href="http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/conversely">http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/conversely</a>)]
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE (COLUMN AR – How To Audit The Case)
[An entire sentence was dropped here.]
[Plural “aberrations” now does not agree with singular “chronic somatic.”]
UNBURDENING ENGRAMS
[This may not seem like a material alteration except for resulting in a less pleasant read, but then again, whyThat basic outness found which will lead to a recovery of stats. (HCO PL 13 Oct 70 II)
make such a change in the first place?]
[In 2007 edition, Unburdering Engrams section was moved to the end of Chapter 13 in Book Two – Column AI Engrams.]
POSITIVE PROCESSING
[In 2007 edition, Positive Processing section was moved to the end of Chapter 8 in Book Two – Column AD Pleasure Moments. The last paragraph originally appearing at the end of Positive Processing section was split up into three paragraphs and moved into its own chapter at the end of 2007 book titled “The Goal of Processing.”]
[1975 printing also had an updated Auditor's Code - "THE AUDITOR'S CODE OF 1958" - on page 285. Strangely enough there is no Auditor's Code cited at the end of 2007 book. There is of course still a chapter “The Auditor's Code” in Book Two, Chapter 2.]
- Internet Library
- L Ron Hubbard Book Alterations
- Fundamentals of Thought - Alterations
- A History of Man - Alterations

