This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Difference between revisions of "A Few Thoughts and Questions"

From Scientolipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(add category & bird)
(Added text and formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Articles
 
{{Articles
 
|Image=LRH-Business.jpg
 
|Image=LRH-Business.jpg
 +
|Topic=Please click DISCUSSION add COMMENTS
 +
|Type of Article=Organizing
 
|Social Media={{Socialmedia}}<br>[[File:Become a patron button.png|140px|link=https://www.patreon.com/scientolipedia]]
 
|Social Media={{Socialmedia}}<br>[[File:Become a patron button.png|140px|link=https://www.patreon.com/scientolipedia]]
 +
|Email=bill77dianaud@gmail.com
 
}}
 
}}
 +
PLEASE, DISCUSSION IS IMPORTANT, CLICK DISCUSSION TO ADD YOUR WISDOM AND PERSPECTIVE.  THANK YOU.
 +
 
== Is there a product? ==
 
== Is there a product? ==
  
Line 9: Line 14:
 
** Is it offering access to information?
 
** Is it offering access to information?
 
** Is it offering full CofS services
 
** Is it offering full CofS services
 +
***What becomes of Standard Tech if not a requirement for certification and qualification?
  
*Does anyone think this is a religious order?
 
*How does an  org build itself with the threat of corporate church legal action in the back ground?
 
  
== Needed Information Technology ==
+
== Does anyone think this is a religious order? ==
 +
*If yes, comment
 +
*If no, comment
  
[[File:Bird (18243756231).jpg|right|300px]]
 
  
*It would be good to know what ‘scientolipedia’ technology needs and the estimated budget to get it where you see it going.
+
*If it is a religious order, then how to ordain ministersAre all auditors ministers?
*More SEOBetter navigation?  More user attractive interface?  
+
 
*Things like that plus the items that you have on your wish list and I have no clue about yet.
+
 
 +
*If it is not a religious order, then is there a non-profit model that works?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*If it is not a religious order, then in the US, do the regulatory schemes crash into the practice of auditing?  i.e. MSW, PhD etc.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*How does a US based org build itself with the threat of corporate church legal action in the back ground?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Needed Information Technology ==
  
== Is there room to question some of the more extreme areas such as: ==
+
*It would be good to know what ‘scientolipedia’ technology needs and the estimated budget to get it where it needs to go.
Ethics conditions?
+
**More SEO? 
 +
**Different navigation? 
 +
**More user attractive interface?  
  
While in some ways these are practical, they are a poor employment practice.
+
*What is on the wish list?
  
Is there an alternative?
+
== Is there room to question ==
  
Why is there a need for punishments?
+
*Is there room to question some of the more extreme areas such as:
 +
**Ethics conditions?
 +
***While in some ways these are practical, they are a poor employment practice.
 +
**Is there an alternative to organizationally mandated Ethics conditions?
 +
***Is there a need for punishments?  ****If so, Why?
  
Why would there be any need for excommunication?
+
**Why would there be any need for excommunication?
 +
***Episcopalians and other post Reformation churches abandoned the practice.
  
Do orgs need to be militaristic?
+
**Do orgs need to be militaristic in their structure?
 +
***Is international command and control necessary?
  
  
 +
PLEASE, DISCUSSION IS IMPORTANT, CLICK DISCUSSION TO ADD YOUR WISDOM AND PERSPECTIVE.  THANK YOU.
 
[[Category:Organizing]]
 
[[Category:Organizing]]

Revision as of 17:48, February 3, 2018

A Few Thoughts and Questions
LRH-Business.jpg
Topic Please click DISCUSSION add COMMENTS
Type of Article Category:Organizing
Social Media Scientolipedia on Facebook Scientolipedia on TwitterScientolipedia Youtube Channel Scientolipedia Newsletter
Become a patron button.png
Email bill77dianaud@gmail.com

PLEASE, DISCUSSION IS IMPORTANT, CLICK DISCUSSION TO ADD YOUR WISDOM AND PERSPECTIVE. THANK YOU.

Is there a product?

  • If so what is the differentiator.
    • We are “NOT the corporate church” fails to be a compelling promotional proposition.
    • Is it offering access to information?
    • Is it offering full CofS services
      • What becomes of Standard Tech if not a requirement for certification and qualification?


Does anyone think this is a religious order?

  • If yes, comment
  • If no, comment


  • If it is a religious order, then how to ordain ministers? Are all auditors ministers?


  • If it is not a religious order, then is there a non-profit model that works?


  • If it is not a religious order, then in the USUnited States. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976)., do the regulatory schemes crash into the practice of auditingThe application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor. (Dianetics & Scientology Technical Dictionary (C) 1975)? i.e. MSW, PhD etc.


  • How does a USUnited States. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976). based org build itself with the threat of corporate church legal action in the back ground?


Needed Information Technology

  • It would be good to know what ‘scientolipedia’ technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech needs and the estimated budget to get it where it needs to go.
    • More SEO?
    • Different navigation?
    • More user attractive interface?
  • What is on the wish list?

Is there room to question

  • Is there room to question some of the more extreme areas such as:
    • Ethics conditions?
      • While in some ways these are practical, they are a poor employment practice.
    • Is there an alternative to organizationally mandated Ethics conditions?
      • Is there a need for punishments? ****If so, Why?
    • Why would there be any need for excommunication?
      • Episcopalians and other postA position from which a terminal operates in an org, where one knows that somebody is at. (FO 2200) Reformation churches abandoned the practice.
    • Do orgs need to be militaristic in their structure?
      • Is international command and control necessary?


PLEASE, DISCUSSION IS IMPORTANT, CLICK DISCUSSION TO ADD YOUR WISDOM AND PERSPECTIVE. THANK YOU.