This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Difference between revisions of "Scientology Offshoots"

From Scientolipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(add Excal info)
(add new offfshoots)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This list needs contributions - create a log in and help fill in missing information
 
This list needs contributions - create a log in and help fill in missing information
 +
 +
:''alphabetical''
 +
== deep clearing ==
 +
http://scientolipedia.org/info/GPM-Processing_-_Complete_Your_Bridge!
 +
 +
Hi Scientolipedia Editor,
 +
 +
Obviously I have a SCN background as I have done scn training prior to 1992. But DEEP is not SCN. I have researched it and written the materials between 2008 and pt. Now I want the public to benefit from it and that takes of course some promotion. I have been associated with a health newsletter, that want to promote our services. For this arrangement to work, I cannot be associated closely with SCN or be called an "offshot". I can appreciate that you work as a historian in the field. I am more concerned about getting my new technology out and applied. I want to promote it to new people who want the benefits and the training.
 +
 +
Usually boards like scientolipedia are edited by the public and maybe monitored by an editor. But to set it up as some sort of one way trap for information or exposee publication is highly controversial in my opinion.
 +
 +
So I kindly ask you not to use your board to stop the practical application of the DEEP tech. In my opinion, SCN is doomed due to the continued bad PR and the abuses of the church. I have learned my lessons dearly and have developed a new tech that takes care of the conflicts that SCN seems to have no cure for but rather create.<ref>[http://scientolipedia.org/info/User_talk:Rolf_dane#Blanking_the_DEEP_Clearing_article_579 Rolf Dane discussion re DEEP's connection to Scientology]</ref>
 +
 +
Best,
 +
 +
Rolf
 +
 +
Rolf dane
 +
== est/landmark worldwide ==
 +
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Worldwide
 
== Excalibur ==
 
== Excalibur ==
 
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
Line 20: Line 40:
 
[[Alan C. Walter|Alan Walter]]'s developments after leaving Scientology as one the the highest trained persons it ever produced.<ref>[http://knowledgism-practice-group.org Knowledgism info]</ref>  
 
[[Alan C. Walter|Alan Walter]]'s developments after leaving Scientology as one the the highest trained persons it ever produced.<ref>[http://knowledgism-practice-group.org Knowledgism info]</ref>  
  
 +
== Lifespring ==
 +
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifespring
  
 +
== TIR ==
 +
http://tira.info/about-tir.html
  
 
==notes==
 
==notes==

Revision as of 18:44, January 18, 2017

Scientology has spawned many offshoot, derivative methodologies and practices.

This list needs contributions - create a log in and help fill in missing information

alphabetical

deep clearing

http://scientolipedia.org/info/GPM-Processing_-_Complete_Your_Bridge!

Hi Scientolipedia Editor,

Obviously I have a SCN background as I have done scn training prior to 1992. But DEEP is not SCN. I have researched it and written the materials between 2008 and pt. Now I want the public to benefit from it and that takes of course some promotion. I have been associated with a health newsletter, that want to promote our services. For this arrangement to work, I cannot be associated closely with SCN or be called an "offshot". I can appreciate that you work as a historian in the field. I am more concerned about getting my new technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech out and applied. I want to promote it to new people who want the benefits and the training.

Usually boards like scientolipedia are edited by the public and maybe monitored by an editor. But to set it up as some sort of one way trap for information or exposee publication is highly controversial in my opinion.

So I kindly ask you not to use your board to stop the practical application of the DEEP techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65). In my opinion, SCN is doomed due to the continued bad PRAbbreviation for public relations. The art of making good works well known. (HCO PL 21 Nov 72 I) and the abuses of the church. I have learned my lessons dearly and have developed a new techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) that takes care of the conflicts that SCN seems to have no cure for but rather create.[1]

Best,

Rolf

Rolf dane

est/landmark worldwide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Worldwide

Excalibur

Developed by Bill Robertson

In 1981 when all went so wrong and David Miscavige began the take over of the church – with the help of some intelligence or IRS or whatever organizations – Captain Bill left the church. First he wanted to establish a Freezone in California and USUnited States. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976). in general but got no support.

He came to Europe where he got enough people and established the Freezone and Ron's Org. By the way, Ron's Org stands for Ron's Organization and Network for Standard technologyThe methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65) ''Abbr.'' tech (note the capital letters.)

Excalibur is part of the upper bridge as delivered in RO's today.

Knowledgism

Alan Walter - creator of Knowledgism

Alan Walter's developments after leaving Scientology as one the the highest trained persons it ever produced.[2]

Lifespring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifespring

TIR

http://tira.info/about-tir.html

notes

  1. ^ Rolf Dane discussion re DEEP's connection to Scientology
  2. ^ Knowledgism info