Difference between revisions of "User:Eugenek/sandbox"

Revision as of 07:59, August 11, 2013

EXAMPLES OF ALTERATIONS

Note! Boldformatting in citations was added to highlight key areas of alteration.
Square brackets - [ ] - were used to insert notes where needed.

CHAPTER ONE

1973 chapter heading	2007 chapter heading
THE VITAL STATISTICS OF SCIENTOLOGY	Scientology Questions and Answers

1973 pages 13–14

2007 pages 5–6

What is Scientology?

Scientology is that branch of psychology which treats of (embraces) human ability. It is an extension of DIANETICS which is in itself an extension of old-time faculty-psychology of 400 years ago. More acceptable and normal psychology such as that begun by St. Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors was, in 1879, interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt, a Marxist at Leipzig University in Germany. This man conceived that man was an animal without soul and based all of his work on the principle that there was no “psyche” (a Greek word meaning “spirit”).

Psychology, the study of the spirit (or mind3. a network of communications and pictures, energies and masses, which are brought into being by the activities of the thetan versus the physical universe or other thetans. The mind is a communication and control system between the thetan and his environment. (FOT, p. 56)...MORE) then came into the peculiar position of being “a study of the spirit which denied the spirit”. For the subsequent decades, Wundtian “psychology” was taught broadly throughout the world. It taught that man was an animal. It taught that man could not be bettered. It taught that intelligence never changed. This subject, Wundtian psychology, became standard, mainly because of the indifference or lack of knowledge of people in charge1. harmful energy or force accumulated and stored within the reactive mind, resulting from the conflicts and unpleasant experiences that a person has had. Auditing discharges this charge so that it is no longer there to affect the individual. (Scn AD)..more of universities.

Scientology is actually a new but very basic psychology in the most exact meaning of the word. It can and does change behavior and intelligence, and it can and does assist people to study life. Unlike Wundtian pseudo-psychology, it has no political aspiration. Scientology is not teaching dialectical materialism under the heading of “psychology”.

The term SCIENTOLOGY is taken from the Latin word SCIO (knowing in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word LOGOS (study).

Scientology, used by the trained and untrained person, improves the health, intelligence, ability, behavior, skill and appearance of people.

It is a precise and exact science, designed for an age of exact sciences.

It is employed by an AUDITOR (a Scientology practitioner) upon individuals or small or large groups of people in their presence. ...

What is Scientology?

SCIENTOLOGY EMBRACES and treats of human ability.

The term Scientology is taken from the Latin word scio (knowing, in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word logos (study of). Scientology is further defined as “the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, universes and other life.”

Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more is a forerunner and substudy of Scientology. Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more comes from the Greek words dia (through) and nous (mind3. a network of communications and pictures, energies and masses, which are brought into being by the activities of the thetan versus the physical universe or other thetans. The mind is a communication and control system between the thetan and his environment. (FOT, p. 56)...MORE or soul). Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more is “what the soul is doing to the body.”

Neither Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more nor Scientology should be confused with “modern” psychology. More acceptable and normal psychology, such as that begun by Sain Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors, was (in 1879) interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt, a Marxist at Leipzig University in Germany. This man conceived that Man was an animal without soul and based all of his work on the principle that there was no psyche (a Greek word meaning “spirit”). Psychology, “the study of the spirit,” then came into the peculiar position of being “a study of the spirit which denied the spirit”. For the subsequent decades, Wundtian “psychology” was taught broadly throughout the world. It taught that Man was an animal. It taught that Man could not be bettered. It taught that intelligence never changed. This subject, Wundtian psychology, became standard mainly because of the indifference or lack of knowledge of people in charge1. harmful energy or force accumulated and stored within the reactive mind, resulting from the conflicts and unpleasant experiences that a person has had. Auditing discharges this charge so that it is no longer there to affect the individual. (Scn AD)..more of universities.

Scientology is actually a new but very basic psychology, in the most exact meaning of the word - “a study of the spirit.” It can and does change behavior and intelligence and it can and does assist people to study life. Unlike Wundtian pseudo-psychology, it has no political aspiration. Scientology is not teaching dialectical materialism under the heading of “psychology”. As has been the tradition for thousand of years, the study of the spirit and all spiritual matter rightfully belong to religion.

Scientology, used by the trained and untrained person, can improve the health, intelligence, ability, behavior, skill and appearance of people.

The Scientology religion is precise and exact, designed for an age of exact sciences.

Scientology is employed by an auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more (a Scientology practitioner). The word auditor1. one who listens and computes; a Scn practitioner. 2. one who has been trained in the technology of Scn. An auditor applies standard technology to preclears. 3. a person who through church training becomes skilled in the successful application of Dn and Scn to his family, friends and the public to achieve the ability gained as stated on the Gradation Chart for his class of training...more means “one who listens, a listener. ...
[alterations continue]

[alteration highlights: the very definition of the subject was changed, key sentences were removed, new sentences were added, a word “science” replaced with a word “religion,” a word “can” was arbitrarily inserted in “can improve” as opposed to “improves”]

It is noted here that the section defining the subject of Scientology was already severely altered in the first edition of “Fundamentals of Thought” under the new copyright “L. Ron Hubbard Library” in 1988. The text there went as follows:

1988 page 9)

“What is Scientology?

Scientology is an applied religious philosophy.

The term Scientology is taken from the Latin word scio (knowing in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word logos (study of). In itself the word means literally “knowing how to know.”

Scientology is further defined as the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, universes and other life. [Nothing of this sort can be found anywhere in 1973 edition.]

Any comparison between Scientology and the subject known as psychology is nonsense. Early psychology such as that begun by St. Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors was, in 1879, interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt...” [the text continues...]

You see that already in 1988 it sounded quite convoluted. Even though a detailed comparison was not performed for 1988 edition, on the surface it looks much more in lineThe military type of organization form whereby there is a definite ascending and descending chain of command. Orders pass from top management down the line of command and compliances and data pass on up without by-passing the chain of command. (Modern Management Defined (c) L. Ron Hubbard, 1976) with 1973 edition in other areas of the book. The word SCIENCE was still preserved in many places in 1988 edition where it was senselessly removed in 2007 edition.

CHAPTER TWO

1973 page 22	2007 page 24
LET USUnited States. (Modern Management Technology Defined (C) 1976). BE PRACTICAL. A science is not a science unless it is practical. A theory is no good unless it works. …	Let us be practical. A theory is no good unless it works. ...

[full sentence removed]

CHAPTER FOUR

1973 page 37

2007 page 38

THE SECOND DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as a sexual or bisexual activity. This actually has two divisions. Second Dynamic (a) is the sexual act itself and the Second Dynamic (b) is the family unit, including the rearing of children. This can be called the SEX DYNAMIC.

THE SECOND DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as a sexual activity. This actually has two divisions. Second Dynamic (a) is the sexual act itself. And the Second Dynamic (b) is the family unit, including the rearing of children. This can be called the Sex Dynamic.

[Word “bisexual” was removed and the third sentence was broken into two.]

1973 page 38	2007 page 39
THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as Infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. It is carefully observed here that the science of Scientology does not intrude into the Dynamic of the Supreme Being. This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the INFINITY or GOD DYNAMIC.	THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity, ∞, stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the Infinity or God Dynamic.

[Full sentence was removed emphasizing Scientology as a science; the first letter of the word “Infinity” was de-capitalized in the first sentence.]

1973 page 38

2007 page 39

The earlier science included Dynamics One to Four.

The earlier subject, , included one to four.

[also note: first letters of words “Dynamics,” “One,” and “Four” were de-capitalized]

CHAPTER FIVE

1973 pages 41–42

2007 pages 47–48

As has already been noted, the triangle is not an equilateral triangle. Affinity and Reality are very much less important than Communication. It might be said that the triangle begins with Communication, which brings into existence Affinity and Reality.

The most primitive Scientology definition of Communication is “Cause-Distance-Effect”. The fundamental manual of Communication is the book, Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more 55!

A-R-C are understanding.

As has already been noted, the triangle is not an equilateral (all sides the same) triangle. Affinity and reality are very much less important than . It might be said that the triangle begins with , which brings into existence and reality.

A-R-C are UNDERSTANDING.

[The paragraph referring readers to Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more 55! to learn about communication1. the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a distance to receipt point with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the source point. (HCOB 5 Apr 73)...more was removed and instead a small footnote was added at the bottom of 2007 edition:
“ *The complete manual of communication1. the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or particle from source point across a distance to receipt point with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the source point. (HCOB 5 Apr 73)...more is Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more 55!”]
[First letters of words “Affinity,” “Reality,” and “Communication” were de-capitalized.]

CHAPTER SEVEN

1973 page 70	2007 page 80
It should be viewed otherwise, for it is intended as an assistance to life at large, to enable life to make a better civilization and a better game. There are no tenets in Scientology which cannot be demonstrated with entirely scientific procedures. [the chapter ends here]	It should be viewed otherwise. For it is intended as an assistance to life at large, to enable life to make a better civilization and a better game. [the chapter ends here]

[The last sentence was dropped, first sentence – broken down into two making it harder to understand and again resulting in very poor grammatical structure.]

CHAPTER EIGHT

1973 page 71	2007 page 85
Scientology as a science is composed of many axioms...	SCIENTOLOGY IS COMPOSED of many axioms...

1973 page 83	2007 page 96
Any information is valuable to the degree that you can use it. In other words, any information is valuable to the degree that you can make it yours. Scientology, of all the sciences, does not teach you — it only reminds you, for the information was yours in the first place. It is not only the science of life, but it is an account of what you were doing before you forgot what you were doing.	Any information is valuable to the degree that you can use it. In other words, any information is valuable to the degree that you can make it yours. Scientology does not teach you. It only reminds you. For the information was yours in the first place. It is not only the science of life, but it is an account of what you were doing before you forgot what you were doing.

[more missing text and improper sentence breakdown]

CHAPTER TWELVE (“Epilogue” in 2007 version)

1973 page 111

2007 page 169

The Future of Scientology

With man now equipped with weapons sufficient to destroy all mankind on Earth, the emergence of a new science capable of handling man is vital. Scientology is such a science. It was born in the same crucible as the atomic bomb. The basic intelligence of Scientology came from nuclear physics, higher mathematics and the understanding of the ancients in the East. Scientology can and does do exactly what it says it can do. In Washington, D.C., there is an enormous file cabinet filled with thousands of casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63) histories, fully validated and sworn to, which attest the scientific thoroughness of Scientology. With Scientology man can prevent insanity, criminality and war. It is for man to use. It is for the betterment of man. The primary race of Earth is not between one nation and another today. The only race that matters at this moment is the one being runUndergo processing. (Science of Survival, p.75) between Scientology and the atomic bomb. The history of man, as has been said by well-known authorities, may well depend upon which one wins.

The Future of Scientology

WITH MAN NOW EQUIPPED with weapons sufficient to destroy all Mankind on Earth, the emergence of a new religion capable of handling Man is vital. Scientology is such a religion. It was born in the same crucible as the atomic bomb. The basic intelligence of Scientology came from nuclear physics, higher mathematics and the understanding of the Ancients in the East. Scientology can do exactly what it says it can do.

With Scientology, Man can prevent insanity, criminality and war. It is for Man to use. It is for the betterment of Man.

Today, the primary race of Earth is not between one nation and another. The only race that matters at this moment is the one being runUndergo processing. (Science of Survival, p.75) between Scientology and the atomic bomb. The history of Man, as has been said by well-known authorities, may well depend upon which one wins.

[Word “science” was replaced with a word “religion.” The sentence about casethe whole sum of past by-passed charge. (HCOB 19 Aug 63) history files in Washington D.C. was removed.] </div>

Difference between revisions of "User:Eugenek/sandbox"

Revision as of 07:59, August 11, 2013

Contents

CHAPTER ONE

CHAPTER TWO

CHAPTER FOUR

CHAPTER FIVE

CHAPTER SEVEN

CHAPTER EIGHT

CHAPTER TWELVE (“Epilogue” in 2007 version)

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

NAVIGATE

AUDITING

BIOS and HISTORIES

RESOURCES

HELP AND SUPPORT

Tools

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div align="center"><br><hr size="2" width="100%"></div>
+<br><div align="center"><u><b>EXAMPLES OF </b></u><u><b>ALTERATIONS</b></u></div><br><i><br>
+Note&#33; </i><i><b>Bold</b></i><i>formatting in citations was added to highlight key areas of alteration. </i><br><i>Square brackets - [ ] - were used to insert notes where needed.</i><br><br><br>
-<div align="center"><b>ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY</b><br><br>
+== CHAPTER ONE ==
+{|  border="1"
-<b>"SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL"</b></div>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 chapter heading</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 chapter heading</b>
-<br><div align="center">Comparing 15<sup>th</sup> printing (1975) of the original 1951 edition copyrighted under L. Ron Hubbard [ISBN 0-88404-001-1] to 2007 altered edition copyrighted under “L. Ron Hubbard Library” [ISBN 978-1-4031-4485-0]<br></div>
-<br><br><i>Please, keep in mind the statements made by David Miscavige with respect to “correcting” the original text when he released his 2007 version of Science of Survival at the Basics release event in 2007:</i>
-<br><br> “The chart of human evaluation is not only the primary tool of a case supervisor, but the theta-MEST theory and the tone scale is the basis of our entire Grade Chart&#33; In other words, to say the book is important would be a gross understatement.” <br>
-... <br>
-“When Science of Survival was published it was presented with a subtitle of 'Simpler and Faster Techniques.' If that's the case, then <b>h</b><b>ow come so many find it so complex?</b>” <br>
-... <br>
-“This too was a dictated book. And since the transcriptionist and the editor were the first to touch this book, the very book defining the various tone levels, it then follows that they were also the first one one (1.1) since the tone level was discovered. And here is what I mean – they were so indecisive they really didn’t know where to begin or end the sentence, specifically, here is where they weren’t sure if it should be a comma or a period and so they split the difference and used a semicolon [<i>presenting animated example of a page on the screen getting populated with semicolons, not a photocopy from an actual book</i>] which <b>a good percentage of readers never understood in the first place</b>. And given one semicolon begets another, it wasn't long before it was <b>the</b><b> march of </b><b>the</b><b> semicolons frustrating readers</b> and lengthening lines to word clearers from one end of Scientology to another. <br><br>
-Not that I want to overstate the matter or bad mouth somebody who was trying, but when you consider that even when they didn't use their multitudes of semicolons, <b>they still started sentence in the wrong place</b>, and when you further consider that when the book was returned to its original and intended form, it reads with a simplicity of a Self-Analysis – it really does bare comment. So let me put it this way: yes, this book too is now perfect; and <b>the number of incorrect instances of punctuations that had to be corrected – hang on to your seat – three thousand eight hundred and twenty five (3825)</b>. So yes, you were right, something just didn't make sense.<br>
-[<i>audience standing up and clapping</i>] <br><br>
-Whereupon what more is there to say? Students were previously spending weeks upon weeks digging their way through this book, perhaps “suffering” is a better word; and yet many students currently on a pilot program are completing this 550 page book in as little as 22 hours. Even if you double or triple that time you are still looking at <b>one tenth (1/10th) previous times</b>.<br><br><b>So for the first time you have LRH's text as he originally intended</b> providing the very basics of the Tone Scale, The Basic Laws of Theta – ARC, including their interaction on the tone scale, and so it goes chapter by chapter. For any who have ever had difficulty with the book, it's now so clear – <b>you will actually wonder where the confusion ever was</b>. Because the book is that simple – <b>JUST as LRH wrote it</b>.”<br><br>
-You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address: http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html<br>
-The segment about Science of Survival starts at 57:17 time marker of the video.
-<br><br><br><br><div align="center"><b>START OF ALTERATIONS REPORT</b></div><br>
-th printing (same year as first publication in 1951) of the original text was also available for this review and is sometimes referred to in comments on alterations. It has not been compared on line by line basis, but on cursory inspection of the text in the 4th printing it looks exactly the same as the text in the 15th printing which would make sense.<br><br>
-In addition, an earlier - 2001 - version of an already altered edition of "Science of Survival" was also acquired for the purpose of determining the total time frame that the parishioners and staff at the Church of Scientology were exposed to the massive alterations that can be found in 2007 text. Not all alterations cited below have been verified against the 2001 edition, but more serious alterations were looked up and in most cases were found to be already present in 2001 edition. Where it has been verified, it was noted in the comments that such alteration is or is not present in 2001 edition. Where it is not noted, it is safe to just assume that such an alteration can already be found in 2001&nbsp;edition of the altered text. This particularly applies to contextual alterations, not to alterations in punctuation.<br><br>
-What this means is that those Scientologists that studied "Science of Survival" beginning with 2001 edition had their minds populated with "crushing MU's," and as many Scientologists familiar with study technology know that this can lead to a variety of undesirable phenomena including: lack of comprehension, inability to apply, confusion and strange ideas, committing overts (harmful acts), and blowing from the subject altogether. And this is just ONE book out of a pile of other materials that could have been and probably were altered in various ways.<br><br><br>
-To aid the ease of analysis, alterations in "Science of Survival" can be separated in four major categories: <br>
-Alterations in CAPITALIZATION <br>
-Alterations in SPELLING <br>
-Alterations in PUNCTUATION / SENTENCE STRUCTURE <br>
-Alterations in WORDING <br><br><br>
-Some key terms relating to grammar should be cleared before reading this report: sentence, subject, verb; coordinating conjunction; participle adjective; the use of a comma, a period, a semicolon, parenthesis and a dash in punctuation. <br><br><br><i>Note&#33; <b>Bold</b></i><i>formatting in citations was added to highlight key areas of alteration.</i><i>Key areas of punctuation will be <u>underlined</u>.</i><i>Square brackets - [ ] - were used to insert comment where needed. With a few exceptions comments will also appear in italics, but italics formatting inside the quotations is original formatting of how it appeared in the book from where it was quoted.</i><br><br><br><br>
-<div align="center"><u><b>CAPITALIZATON</b></u></div><br>
-Many dianetic terms have been capitalized which were not capitalized in the original text:<br><br>
-Dianetic, Dianetically, Dianetic Release, Release, Clear, Tone Scale, Tone, Straight Memory, Lock Scanning, Lock Scan, Lock Scanned, Lock Reduction, Chain Scanning, Repeater Technique, Affinity, Reality, and Communication, First through Seventh Dynamic, Auditor’s Code, Repeater Technique, Theta-MEST Theory, Standard Procedure, Positive Processing. <br><br><br>
-The word “clear” was capitalized into absurdity of having it capitalized where it did not even mean the state of clear as in “Clear-thinking”:<br><br>
-: B2-267) Well, <b>Clear-thinking</b>, strong individuals are highly necessary in this society at this time.<br><br><br>
-Word “clear” was also improperly capitalized where it served as a participle adjective “cleared”:<br><br>
-: B2-382) The auditor, thus, must be compatible with the preclear and must have been <b>Cleared</b> with the preclear (as a group of two) if he expects to run any secondary engrams on this preclear. <br><br><br>
-Some other terms not directly related to Dianetics were capitalized as well: <br>
-Absolute Truth, Forced of Good, Forces of Evil, Devil, Communism, Man, Mankind, Mama and Papa. <br><br>
-It is interesting to note that while the word “devil” was capitalized in instances where it was not capitalized in the original text, the word “Godless” was de-capitalized where it was capitalized in the original text. <br><br><br><br>
-<div align="center"><u><b>SPELLING</b></u></div><br>
-Many words which were originally spelled using proper British spelling were changed into American spelling format. The following is a list of words that were noted to have been changed in spelling. There could be more examples in text: <br><br>
-Favour &gt; favor; behaviour &gt; behavior; endeavour &gt; endeavor; amongst &gt; among; skilfully &gt; skillfully; honour &gt; honor; analyser &gt; analyzer; sanatorium &gt; sanitarium; theatre &gt; threater; anaesthetic &gt; anesthetic; labelled &gt; labeled; odour &gt; odor; mould &gt; mold; centre &gt; center; programme &gt; program; towards &gt; toward; favourite &gt; favorite; pretence &gt; pretense; judgement &gt; judgment; odour &gt; odor; paralyse &gt; paralyze; criticising &gt; criticizing. <br><br><br>
-Many numbers that were written in words were changed to number format such as “seventy” to “70.” <br><br><br>
-There were also changes in the use of a hyphen in either adding or removing it such as in the following examples: <br><br>
-A-R-C &gt; ARC; pre-clear &gt; preclear; psycho-surgery &gt; psychosurgery; psycho-therapist &gt; psychotherapist; coaudit &gt; co-audit; nonsurvival &gt; non-survival; un-enturbulate &gt; unentrubulate <br><br><br><br>
-<div align="center"><u><b>PUNCTUATION / SENTENCE STRUCTURE</b></u></div><br>
-At the center stage of changes in punctuation is breaking down joined sentences often resulting in a very much unwanted dispersal of conceptual concentration and an unpleasant read. <br><br>
-Many sentences that were joined with a coordinating conjunction (and, but, for, etc) and a comma were broken down with a period. Examples:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-5</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-6</b>
 |-
-| Each form evolved from the initial impact of theta against <u>MEST, and</u> each form on a higher level is supported by lower-level forms.<br>
+|  valign="top" | THE VITAL STATISTICS OF SCIENTOLOGY
-| Each form evolved from the initial impact of theta Against <u>MEST. And</u> each form on a higher level is supported by lower-level forms.<br>
+|  valign="top" | Scientology Questions and Answers
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-19</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-21</b>
-|-
-| The auditor who is doing processing regularly and has been trained for it will use any method to raise the tone of his <u>preclear*, for when</u> the tone is raised, processing is easier.<br>
-| The auditor who is doing processing regularly and has been trained for it will use any method to raise the tone of his <u>preclear.* For when</u> the tone is raised, processing is easier.<br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-50</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-58</b>
-|-
-| He has no irrational reasons to experience grief <u>or fear, but when</u> present-time circumstances strongly call for these emotions, he will display them, and yet soon afterwards be fully recovered.<br>
-| He has no irrational reasons to experience grief <u>or fear. But when</u> present time circumstances strongly call for these emotions, he will display them and yet soon afterward be fully recovered.<br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-63</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-72</b>
-|-
-| If communication exists, some agreement can be <u>reached, and</u> as soon as an agreement is reached between two people or by a man with himself, there is some affinity.<br>
-| If communication exists, some agreement can be <u>reached. And</u> as soon as an agreement is reached between two people or by a man with himself, there is some affinity.<br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B2-18</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B2-232</b>
-|-
-| If one does not feel that he can keep the auditor’s code wholly and completely, he should not under any circumstances audit <u>anyone, nor</u> should he permit himself to be persuaded to audit <u>anyone, and</u> any pre-clear should be very wary of permitting himself to be audited by anyone who potentially would break the auditor’s code.
-| If one does not feel that he can keep the Auditor’s Code wholly and completely, he should not, under any circumstances, audit <u>anyone. Nor</u> should he permit himself to be persuaded to audit <u>anyone. And</u> any preclear should be very wary of permitting himself to be audited by anyone who potentially would break the Auditor’s Code.
 |}<br><br>
-Some sentences with a coordinating conjunction were broken down where there was not even a punctuation mark such as a comma or a semicolon requiring a pause. Examples:<br><br>
+{|  border="1"
-{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 pages 13–14</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-13</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 pages 5–6</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-15</b>
 |-
-| The result is that when he is in a restimulative environment he may be covertly <u>hostile but in</u> a more favourable environment he may be analytically very productive.<br>
+|  valign="top" | <i>What is Scientology?</i><br><br><b>Scientology is that branch of psychology</b> which treats of (embraces) human ability. It is an extension of       <b>DIANETICS which is in itself an extension of old-time faculty-psychology of 400 years ago</b>. More acceptable and normal psychology such as that begun by St. Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors was, in 1879, interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt, a Marxist at Leipzig University in Germany. This man conceived that man was an animal without soul and based all of his work on the principle that there was no “psyche” (a Greek word meaning “spirit”).<br><br>
-| The result is that when he is in a restimulative environment, he may be covertly <u>hostile. But </u>in a more favorable environment, he may be analytically very productive.<br>
+Psychology, the study of the spirit (or mind) then came into the peculiar position of being “a study of the spirit which denied the spirit”. For the subsequent decades, Wundtian “psychology” was taught broadly throughout the world. It taught that man was an animal. It taught that man could not be bettered. It taught that intelligence never changed. This subject, Wundtian psychology, became standard, mainly because of the indifference or lack of knowledge of people in charge of universities.<br><br>
+Scientology is actually a new but very basic psychology in the most exact meaning of the word. It can and does change behavior and intelligence, and it can and does assist people to study life. Unlike Wundtian pseudo-psychology, it has no political aspiration. Scientology is not teaching dialectical materialism under the heading of “psychology”.<br><br>
+The term SCIENTOLOGY is taken from the Latin word SCIO (knowing in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word LOGOS (study).<br><br>
+Scientology, used by the trained and untrained person, <b>improves</b> the health, intelligence, ability, behavior, skill and appearance of people.<br><br><b>It is a precise and exact science</b>, designed for an age of exact sciences.<br><br>
+It is employed by an AUDITOR (a Scientology practitioner) upon individuals or small or large groups of people in their presence. ...
+|  valign="top" | <i>What is Scientology?</i><br><br>
+SCIENTOLOGY EMBRACES and treats of human ability.<br><br>
+The term Scientology is taken from the Latin word <i>scio</i> (knowing, in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word       <i>logos</i> (study of). Scientology is further defined as “the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, universes and other life.”<br><br>
+Dianetics is a forerunner and substudy of Scientology. Dianetics comes from the Greek words <i>dia       </i>(through) and <i>nous</i> (mind or soul). Dianetics is “what the soul is doing to the body.”<br><br><b>Neither Dianetics nor Scientology should be confused with “modern” psychology.</b> More acceptable and normal psychology, such as that begun by Sain Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors, was (in 1879) interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt, a Marxist at Leipzig University in Germany. This man conceived that Man was an animal without soul and based all of his work on the principle that there was no <i>psyche</i> (a Greek word meaning “spirit”). Psychology, “the study of the spirit,” then came into the peculiar position of being “a study of the spirit which <i>denied</i> the spirit”. For the subsequent decades, Wundtian “psychology” was taught broadly throughout the world. It taught that Man was an animal. It taught that Man could not be bettered. It taught that intelligence never changed. This subject, Wundtian psychology, became standard mainly because of the indifference or lack of knowledge of people in charge of universities.<br><br>
+Scientology is actually a <i>new</i> but very basic psychology, in the most exact meaning of the word - “a study of the spirit.” It can and does change behavior and intelligence and it can and does assist people to study life. Unlike Wundtian pseudo-psychology, it has no political aspiration. Scientology is not teaching dialectical materialism under the heading of “psychology”. <b>As has been the tradition for thousand of years, the study of the spirit and all spiritual matter rightfully belong to religion.</b><br><br>
+Scientology, used by the trained and untrained person, <b>can</b> improve the health, intelligence, ability, behavior, skill and appearance of people.<br><br><b>The Scientology religion is precise and exact</b>, designed for an age of exact sciences.<br><br>
+Scientology is employed by an       <i>auditor (</i>a Scientology practitioner). <b>The word auditor means “one who listens, a listener.</b> ...<br>
+[<i>alterations continue</i>]
 |}<br>
-[<i>Also, notice two additional commas requiring a pause where there doesn’t need to be one.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>alteration highlights: </i><i>t</i><i>he very definition of the subject was changed, key sentences were removed, new sentences were added, a word “science” replaced with a word “religion,” a word “can” was arbitrarily inserted in “can improve” as opposed to “improves”</i>]<br><br><br>
-{|  border="1"
+It is noted here that the section defining the subject of Scientology was already severely altered in the first edition of “Fundamentals of Thought” under the new copyright “L. Ron Hubbard Library” in 1988. The text there went as follows:<br><br><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-15</b>
+page 9)<br><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-18</b>
+“What is Scientology?<br><br><b>Scientology is an applied religious philosophy.</b><br><br>
+The term <i>Scientology</i> is taken from the Latin word <i>scio</i> (knowing in the fullest meaning of the word) and the Greek word <i>logos</i> (study of). In itself the word means literally “knowing how to know.”<br><br><b>Scientology is further defined as the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, universes and other life.</b> [<i>Nothing of this sort can be found anywhere in 1973 edition.</i>] <br><br><b>Any comparison between Scientology and the subject known as psychology is nonsense.</b> Early psychology such as that begun by St. Thomas Aquinas and extended by many later authors was, in 1879, interrupted severely by one Professor Wundt...” [<i>the text continues...</i>] <br><br>
+You see that already in 1988 it sounded quite convoluted. Even though a detailed comparison was not performed for 1988 edition, on the surface it looks much more in line with 1973 edition in other areas of the book. The word SCIENCE was still preserved in many places in 1988 edition where it was senselessly removed in 2007 edition. <br><br><br>
+== CHAPTER TWO ==
+{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 22</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 24</b>
 |-
-| Further recounting brings him into a cheerful frame of mind <u>about it and finally</u> he simply laughs over it.<br>
+|  valign="top" | LET US BE PRACTICAL. <b>A science is not a science unless it is practical</b>. A theory is no good unless it works. …
-| Further recounting brings him into a <i>cheerful </i>frame of mind <u>about it. And finally</u> he simply <i>laughs       </i>over it.<br>
+|  valign="top" | Let us be practical. A theory is no good unless it works. ...
+|}<br>
+[<i>full sentence removed</i>] <br><br><br>
+== CHAPTER FOUR ==
+{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b> 1973 page 37</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 38</b>
 |-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-21</b>
+|  valign="top" | THE SECOND DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as a sexual <b>or bisexual activity.</b> This dynamic actually has two divisions. Second Dynamic (a) is the sexual act itself and the Second Dynamic (b) is the family unit, including the rearing of children. This can be called the SEX DYNAMIC.
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-23</b>
+|  valign="top" |  THE SECOND DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as a sexual activity. This dynamic actually has two divisions. Second Dynamic (a) is the sexual act <b>itself. And</b> the Second Dynamic (b) is the family unit, including the rearing of children. This can be called the S<i>ex Dynamic</i>.
-|-
-| Finally we have the band below death and the MEST <u>body and</u> on these we can do nothing, of course.
-| Finally we have the band below <i>death </i>and the MEST <u>body. And</u> on these we can do nothing, of course.
-|}<br><br>
-Few sentences that were originally separated with a period were combined instead. Examples:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-9</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-10</b>
-|-
-| Thus the small boy who hit his head on the rock knows analytically that he fell and hit his head, perhaps, but he “knows” better with his reactive mind. Suppose the smell o f dust was present in the <u>accident. The reactive</u> mind has stored the perceptic of the smell o f dust.
-| Thus the small boy who hit his head on the rock knows analytically that he fell and hit his head, perhaps, but he “knows” better with his reactive mind. Supposing the smell of dust was present in the <u>accident, the reactive</u> mind stored the perceptic of the smell of dust.
 |}<br>
-{|  border="1"
+[<i>Word “bisexual” was removed and the third sentence was broken into two.</i>]<br><br><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-122</b>
+{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-141</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 38</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 39</b>
 |-
-| The auditor should keep in mind the axiom that all creation carries with it a small amount of destruction; just as one may not be able to construct an apartment building without destroying the tenement which sits there; just as one may not be able to publish a newspaper without destroying forests to obtain <u>newsprint. It is</u> the ratio of creation to destruction which counts.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as Infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. <b>It is carefully observed here that the </b><i><b>science</b></i><b> of Scientology does not intrude into the Dynamic of the Supreme Being.</b> This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the INFINITY or GOD DYNAMIC.
-| The auditor should keep in mind the axiom that all creation carries with it a small amount of destruction. Just as one may not be able to construct an apartment building without destroying the tenement which sits there, just as one may not be able to publish a newspaper without destroying forests to obtain <u>newsprint, it is</u> the <i>ratio </i>of creation to destruction which counts.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC — is the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. This is called the Eighth Dynamic because the symbol of infinity, ∞, stood upright makes the numeral “8”. This can be called the       <i>Infinity</i> or <i>God Dynamic</i>.
 |}<br>
-[<i>Here replacing period with a comma between “newsprint” and “it” resulted in a grammatical error called “comma splice.” See more explanation on this and the use of a semicolon in a separate section below.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>Full sentence was removed emphasizing Scientology as a science; the first letter of the word “Infinity” was de-capitalized in the first sentence</i>.] <br><br><br>
-Many sentences that were joined with a semicolon with or without a coordinating conjunction were broken down with a period (see “MORE ON THE USE OF A SEMICOLON” section for examples). <br><br><br>
+{|  border="1"
-The indiscriminate breaking down of sentences extended into a total absurdity of resulting in sentences that are grammatically incorrect:<br><br>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 38</b>
-{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 39</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-3</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-59</b>
 |-
-| First, the pre-clear would be in very deep apathy, not knowing or caring whether this incident would resolve or not. He would then go up the scale to <u>apathy, then to grief</u>.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  The earlier <b>science</b> Dianetics included Dynamics One to Four.
-| First, the preclear would be in very deep apathy, not knowing or caring whether this incident would resolve or not. He would then go up the scale to <u>apathy. Then to grief</u>.<br>
+|  valign="top" | The earlier <b>subject</b>, Dianetics, included dynamics one to four.
 |}<br>
-[<i>“Then to grief” is an incomplete sentence since it does not contain a verb and is just a continuation of the concept being expressed in the preceding sentence.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>also note: first letters of words “Dynamics,” “One,” and “Four” were de-capitalized</i>] <br><br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-79</b>
+== CHAPTER FIVE ==
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-91</b>
+{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 pages 41–42</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 pages 47–48</b>
 |-
-| The word <i>somatic </i>means, actually, <i>bodily       </i>or <i>physical. </i>Because the word <i>pain       </i>is restimulative, and because the word pain has in the past led to a confusion between physical pain and mental pain, the word somatic is used in Dianetics to denote physical pain or discomfort of any kind. It can mean actual pain, such as that caused by a cut or a blow; or it can mean discomfort, as from heat or cold; it can mean <u>itching—in short</u>, anything physically uncomfortable.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  As has already been noted, the triangle is not an equilateral triangle. Affinity and Reality are very much less important than Communication. It might be said that the triangle begins with Communication, which brings into existence Affinity and Reality.       <br><b><br>
-| The word <i>somatic </i>means, actually, “bodily or physical.” Because the word <i>pain </i>is restimulative and because the word pain has in the past led to a confusion between physical pain and mental pain, the word <i>somatic </i>is used, in Dianetics, to denote physical pain or discomfort of any kind. It can mean actual pain such as that caused by a cut or a blow. Or it can mean discomfort as from heat or cold. It can mean <u>itching. In short</u>, anything physically uncomfortable.<br>
+The most primitive Scientology definition of Communication is “Cause-Distance-Effect”. The fundamental manual of Communication is the book, </b><i><b>Dianetics 55&#33;</b></i><br><br>
+A-R-C       <i>are</i> understanding.
+|  valign="top" |  As has already been noted, the triangle is not an equilateral (all sides the same) triangle. Affinity and reality are very much less important than communication. It might be said that the triangle begins with communication, which brings into existence affinity and reality.<br><br>
+A-R-C       <i>are</i> UNDERSTANDING.
 |}<br>
-[<i>Notice how in the original sentence a semicolon was skillfully used to connect related sentences in a more continuous flow of thought – this was broken up with periods in the “corrected” 2007 version. In addition, “in Dianetics” was surrounded by commas where it did not need to be, and “in short, anything physically uncomfortable” was separated into its own sentence resulting in incorrect grammar since it does not contain a verb.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>The paragraph referring readers to Dianetics 55&#33; to learn about communication was removed and instead a small footnote was added at the bottom of 2007 edition: </i><br>
-Here is another clear example: <br><br>
+“ *The complete manual of communication is <i>Dianetics 55&#33;”]</i><br>
-{|  border="1"
+[<i>First letters of words “Affinity,” “Reality,” and “Communication” were de-capitalized.</i>] <br><br><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B2-11</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B2-225</b>
+== CHAPTER SEVEN ==
+{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | 1973 page 70
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" |  2007 page 80
 |-
-| The mate who is lower will demand more communication and give <u>less, and</u> will assert more reality but will actually have less.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  It should be viewed <u>otherwise, for</u> it is intended as an assistance to life at large, to enable life to make a better civilization and a better game. <b>There are no tenets in Scientology which cannot be demonstrated with entirely scientific procedures.</b><br>
-| The mate who is lower will demand more communication and give <u>less. And</u> will assert more <u>reality, but</u> will actually have less.<br>
+[<i>the chapter ends here</i>]
+|  valign="top" |  It should be viewed <u>otherwise. For</u> it is intended as an assistance to life at large, to enable life to make a better civilization and a better game.<br>
+[<i>the chapter ends here</i>]
 |}<br>
-[<i>Here “And will assert more reality, but will actually have less” is not a correct sentence because it does not contain a subject. Comma between “less” and “and” were used in the original text as a matter of style and not to separate two sentences joined with a coordinating conjunction as usually the case. Also, there is no need for a pause between “reality” and “but” so there was no need to have a comma in that place.</i>]<br><br><br><br><b>MORE ON THE USE OF A SEMICOLON</b><br><br>
+[<i>The last sentence was dropped, first sentence – broken down into two making it harder to understand and again resulting in </i><i>very poor</i><i> grammatical structure.</i>] <br><br><br>
-Let’s look at Miscavige’s claim with respect to the use a semicolon a little closer: <br><br>
-“…they [<i>transcriptionist and the editor</i>] were so indecisive they really didn’t know where to begin or end the sentence, specifically, here is where they weren’t sure if it should be a comma or a period and so they split the difference and used a semicolon…” <br><br>
+== CHAPTER EIGHT ==
-First of all, there was no “they.” The author of the book is L. Ron Hubbard. Second, this utterly absurd statement should make one wonder – does David Miscavige himself understand the use of a semicolon in sentences or even the grammatical construct of sentences in general? It is quite obvious from the ample examples provided in this report that this man, who never published a single book in his life, must himself lack some very basic education to say the least. <br><br>
+{|  border="1"
-So what are the rules for using a semicolon? This can be easily answered by anyone with Internet access and some ability to read. Some good resources for understanding the use of a semicolon: <br>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 71</b>
-http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/semicolon<br>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 85</b>
-http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/semicolons.asp<br>
-http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Semicolons.html (you can also use this website for definition of terms: independent clause, coordinating conjunctions, conjunctive adverbs, and transitional phrases).<br><br><br>
-General rule: “The main task of the semicolon is to mark a break that is stronger than a comma but not as final as a full stop. It’s used between two main clauses that balance each other and are too closely linked to be made into separate sentences.” [http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/semicolon]:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-42</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-49</b>
 |-
-| Theta itself could be called reason; entheta could be called unreason.<br><br>
+|  valign="top" | Scientology <b>as a science</b> is composed of many axioms...
-| Theta itself could be called <i>reason. </i>Entheta could be called <i>unreason.<br><br></i>
+|  valign="top" | SCIENTOLOGY IS COMPOSED of many axioms...
-|-
+|}<br style="text-decoration: underline;"><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-60</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-69</b>
-|-
-| The existence of God and spiritual manifestations could be classified as theta <u>universe; contact</u> with these would be considered a use of theta perceptics.<br><br>
-| The existence of God and spiritual manifestations could be classified as theta <u>universe. Contact</u> with these would be considered a use of theta perceptics.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-63</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-72</b>
-|-
-| There cannot, for instance, be communication and affinity <u>alone; these</u> two things would result in an agreement of some sort, which agreement would be reality.
-| There cannot, for instance, be communication and affinity <u>alone. These</u> two things would result in an agreement of some sort, which agreement would be a reality.
-|}<br><br>
-More specific use: “Use a semicolon between two independent clauses that are connected by conjunctive adverbs or transitional phrases.” [http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Semicolons.html]:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-66</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-77</b>
-|-
-| A primary concern of the auditor is the turning on of <u>sonic; therefore</u> he must know what turns it off.<br><br>
-| A primary concern of the auditor is the turning on of <u>sonic. Therefore</u>, he must know what turns it off.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-83</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-96</b>
-|-
-| Running locks and secondaries is a much more rapid way of raising the tone of the <u>case; however</u>, that tone can fall again so long as engrams remain.<br><br>
-| Running locks and secondaries is a much more rapid way of raising the tone of the <u>case. However</u>, that tone can fall again so long as engrams remain.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-107</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-122</b>
-|-
-| Valence is a survival mechanism, one of the means used by the mind to escape too painful an <u>existence; therefore</u>, in order to get the pre-clear into his own valence much of the charge has to be unburdened from the track.
-| Valence is a survival mechanism, one of the means used by the mind to escape too painful an <u>existence. Therefore</u>, in order to get the preclear into his own valence, much o f the charge has to be unburdened from the track.
-|}<br><br>
-Another specific use: “Use a semicolon between independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction if the clauses are already punctuated with commas or if the clauses are lengthy.” [http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Semicolons.html]:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-48</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-55</b>
-|-
-| The development of a new science naturally means the development of many new <u>terms; and</u> as new data is discovered, old definitions are often found to be inadequate.<br><br>
-| The development of a new science naturally means the development of many new <u>terms. And</u> as new data is discovered, old definitions are often found to be inadequate.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-52</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-60</b>
-|-
-| If he cannot turn on grief, he may be able to turn on <u>anger; and</u> once he has taken some of the anger off the case perhaps he can run some of the lower levels such as fear.<br><br>
-| If he cannot turn on grief, he may be able to turn on <u>anger. And</u> once he has taken some of the anger off of the case, perhaps he can run some o f the lower levels such as fear.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-81</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-93</b>
-|-
-| There is much more that could be discovered about this mechanism or conversion of physical pain to, for instance, terror or grief or <u>apathy; and</u> the discovery probably lies in the field of further examination and understanding of free <u>theta; but</u> it is certain that secondary engrams, with their mis-emotion, occlude somatics.
-| There is much more that could be discovered about this mechanism of conversion of physical pain to, for instance, terror or grief or <u>apathy, and</u> the discovery probably lies in the field of further examination and understanding of free <u>theta. But</u> it is certain that secondary engrams, with their mis-emotion, occlude somatics.
-|}<br><br>
-Grammatical error: “Both parts of the sentence are independent clauses, and commas should not be used to connect independent clauses if there is no coordinating conjunction. This mistake is known as a <b>comma splice</b>.” [http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Semicolons.html]:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-59</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-69</b>
-|-
-| Thus, we have hearing because there are sound waves which can be registered and <u>interpreted; we</u> have sight because light waves exist to be registered; and so forth.<br><br>
-| Thus, we have hearing because there are sound waves which can be registered and <u>interpreted, we </u>have sight because light waves exist to be registered, and so forth.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-63</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-73</b>
-|-
-| The auditor must appreciate the value of <u>communication; since</u> if his pre-clear cannot communicate with his own past he cannot make an accurate adjudication of his own present and he certainly cannot compute his own future.<br><br>
-| The auditor must appreciate the value of <u>communication, since</u> if his preclear cannot communicate with his own past, he cannot make an accurate adjudication of his own present and he certainly cannot compute his own future.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-66</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-77</b>
-|-
-| The next most severe interference with sonic comes from valence shifters; the person’s identity is confused with that of another <u>person; he</u> is not in his own valence, and he is off his own time track.
-| The next most severe interference with sonic comes from <i>valence shifters. </i>The person’s identity is confused with that of another <u>person, he</u> is not in his own valence and he is off his own time track.
-|}<br><br><br><b>MISLEADING USE OF PARENTHESIS</b><br><br>
-Parenthesis are commonly used in sentences to include optional text that clarifies something in the sentence but is not considered essential, meaning – if you read the sentence without the text in parenthesis, it is still a complete communication. There are quite a number of cases throughout 2007 "Science of Survival" where phrases within sentences were surrounded with parenthesis erroneously communicating to readers that the text now enclosed in parenthesis is an optional addition and non-essential instead of being an inseparable part of the sentence. Here are a few examples:<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-40</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-45</b>
-|-
-| Contradicting one of the child’s statements or beliefs, <u>which is to say his reality</u>, is also to break affinity with him and suppress his communication.<br><br>
-| Contradicting one of the child’s statements or beliefs <u>(which is to say, his reality)</u> is also to break affinity with him and to suppress his communication.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-47</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-54</b>
-|-
-| The sixth dynamic would include the affinity, communication, and reality of MEST as itself, <u>within its own laws as expressed in the physical sciences</u>; but more important for our purposes, the feeling of the individual for MEST, to know it, to use it, and to preserve it.<br><br>
-| The Sixth Dynamic would include the affinity, communication and reality of MEST as itself <u>(within its own laws as expressed in the physical sciences)</u>, but more important for our purposes, the feeling of the individual for MEST: to know it, to use it and to preserve it.<br><br>
-|-
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-49</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-56</b>
-|-
-| If the present-time situation seemed to indicate, <u>because of happy circumstances</u>, happiness, and yet the individual remained apathetic, this would be irrational.
-| If the present time situation seemed to indicate <u>(because of happy circumstances)</u> happiness and yet the individual remained apathetic, this would be irrational.
-|}<br><br>
 {|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50% | <b>1975: B1-49</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 83</b>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-56</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 96</b>
 |-
-| Being emotional, however, would indicate, <u>if the emotionality agreed with current circumstances</u>, a rational state of being.<br><br>
+|  valign="top" | Any information is valuable to the degree that you can use it. In other words, any information is valuable to the degree that you can make it yours. Scientology, <b>of all the sciences</b>, does not teach you — it only <u>reminds you, for the</u> information was yours in the first place. It is not only the science of life, but it is an account of what you were doing before you forgot what you were doing.
-| Being emotional, however, would indicate <u>(if the emotionality agreed with current circumstances)</u> a rational state of being.<br><br>
+|  valign="top" | Any information is valuable to the degree that you can use it. In other words, any information is valuable to the degree that you can make it yours. Scientology does not teach you. It only <u>reminds you. For the</u> information was yours in the first place. It is not only the science of life, but it is an account of what you were doing before you forgot what you were doing.<br><br>
 |}<br>
-[<i>The sentence means something entirely different without the text that was enclosed in parenthesis here.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>more missing text and improper sentence breakdown</i>]<br><br><br>
-{|  border="1"
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-60</b>
+== CHAPTER TWELVE (“Epilogue” in 2007 version) ==
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-69</b>
+{|  border="1"
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>1973 page 111</b>
+|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%" | <b>2007 page 169</b>
 |-
-| Oddly enough, in Dianetics considerable evidence, <u>whether we wish it or not</u>, is accumulating in favour of not only a theta universe and a theta body but of theta perceptics, as well. This has proceeded far enough to contain some evidence that certain techniques of application, <u>already partially formed</u>, exist by which the theta perceptics can be <b style="">cleared</b>, raising the prediction potentiality of the individual, amongst other things.<br>
+|  valign="top" |  The Future of Scientology<br><br>
-| Oddly enough, in Dianetics considerable evidence <u>(whether we wish it or not)</u> is accumulating in favor of not only a theta universe and a theta body, but of theta perceptics as well. This has proceeded far enough to contain some evidence that certain techniques of application <u>(already partially formed)</u> exist by which the theta perceptics can be <b style="">Cleared</b>, raising the prediction potentiality of the individual among other things.<br>
+With man now equipped with weapons sufficient to destroy all mankind on Earth, the emergence of a new <b>science</b> capable of handling man is vital. Scientology is such a <b>science</b>. It was born in the same crucible as the atomic bomb. The basic intelligence of Scientology came from nuclear physics, higher mathematics and the understanding of the ancients in the East. Scientology can and does do exactly what it says it can do. <b>In Washington, D.C., there is an enormous file cabinet filled with thousands of case histories, fully validated and sworn to, which attest the scientific thoroughness of Scientology.</b> With Scientology man can prevent insanity, criminality and war. It is for man to use. It is for the betterment of man. The primary race of Earth is not between one nation and another today. The only race that matters at this moment is the one being run between Scientology and the atomic bomb. The history of man, as has been said by well-known authorities, may well depend upon which one wins.
-|}<br><br>
+|  valign="top" |  The Future of Scientology<br><br>
-{|  border="1"
+WITH MAN NOW EQUIPPED with weapons sufficient to destroy all Mankind on Earth, the emergence of a new <b>religion</b> capable of handling Man is vital. Scientology is such a <b>religion</b>. It was born in the same crucible as the atomic bomb. The basic intelligence of Scientology came from nuclear physics, higher mathematics and the understanding of the Ancients in the East. Scientology can do exactly what it says it can do.<br><br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>1975: B1-70</b>
+With Scientology, Man can prevent insanity, criminality and war. It is for Man to use. It is for the betterment of Man.<br>
-|  align="center" scope="col" width="50%"| <b>2007: B1-80</b>
+&nbsp;<br>
-|-
+Today, the primary race of Earth is not between one nation and another. The only race that matters at this moment is the one being run between Scientology and the atomic bomb. The history of Man, as has been said by well-known authorities, may well depend upon which one wins.
-| When we take this individual and dianetically process him <u>and turn the entheta into theta</u>, he becomes more and more powerful and able to cope with and adjust his environment.<br><br>
-| When we take this individual and Dianetically process him <u>(and turn the entheta into theta)</u>, he becomes more and more powerful and able to cope with and adjust his environment.<br><br>
 |}<br>
-[<i>There is absolutely nothing optional about the text that was enclosed in parenthesis in this sentence.</i>]<br><br><br>
+[<i>Word “science” was replaced with a word “religion.” The sentence about case history files in Washington D.C. was removed.</i>] </div>
-Examples of misusing parenthesis like the few above are abundant throughout the text – at least a few in nearly every chapter. Alterations in punctuation overall however are so abundant that it would be an overwhelming task&nbsp;to even just count every single occurrence. Miscavige did say 3825 – he wasn't kidding.<br><br><br><br>
-<div align="center"><u><b>ALTERATIONS IN WORDING</b></u></div>