This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Difference between revisions of "L Ron Hubbard Book Alterations"

From Scientolipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(formatting, link)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
L Ron Hubbard's Dianetics and Scientology books have been altered from his original writings and publications, and not for the better - the proof is in this and related articles attached.
+
<div align="center"><b>ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY</b><br>
:''One of our team members has done some great work on exposing the corruption of L Ron Hubbard's original written works. He lays bare the lies of "improved" versions of the Scientology basic books as presented by David Miscavige in the release of the "Basics" re-publications of LRH's books in 2007.''
+
<u><b>SUMMARY OF FINDINGS</b></u><br>
 
+
Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign<br>
:''You can find more of his work at his website [http://www.truebasics.x10.mx/ HERE]''
+
[http://www.truelrh.com wwww.trueLRH.com]</div>
  
 +
<center>''Note: You can own your own original versions of L Ron Hubbard's books - available at [https://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&toolid=11800&pub=undefined&campid=5338312792&mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dp2380057.m570.l1312.R1.TR11.TRC4.A0.H1.Xscientology.TRS1%26_nkw%3Dscientology%2Bbooks%26_sacat%3D102545 EBay]''</center>
 +
<br>
 +
There is no better way to start this summary than to quote what David Miscavige presented as his “summary” of all the things that were supposedly wrong with the original publications and show how the things that he listed are actually the things that HE did to undermine the works of L. Ron Hubbard in creating his batch of distorted books called THE BASICS.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 +
|-
 +
|  {{#widget:YouTube|id=DlN6EHIEsis|width=400|height=300}}
 +
|-
 +
| David Miscavige giving Scientologists the false premise for the
 +
alterations he introduced into the books of [[L Ron Hubbard]]
 +
|}
 +
:Because where it's headed is not just the full recovery of the books but so much more including literally discovering lost tech, and I do mean hidden from view, that surrounds these books.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
:So once again, the question: how does one lose tech? MISUNDERSTOODS. And whose were they? THE TRANSCRIPTIONIST’s. Yes, you heard me: the transcriptionist’s. And here is what I mean. With a lecture, you hear LRH and the words he said. In a policy letter, you read them as he hand-wrote or typed them. Yet the books, with only one exception, were dictated. Meaning, he spoke them into a tape recorder and they were typed by a transcriptionist. You get LRH’s words as he or she relayed them, and when that person had a misunderstood, you get this: distortions, alterations and perversions, some little, some huge, but every one of them – a hang up for the reader, and that’s why I said you can look up every single word in one of these book and still not get it because when you track it out across the entire LRH library, you get such alterations as entirely missing chapters; total garbles; parts of the text specifically said to be deleted by LRH but left in anyway causing complete mystery; transcription errors whereby LRH dictates a sentence and then replaces it with another, but the transcriptionist was too lazy to go back and correct it leaving both sentences in the book. And if that’s not enough, take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends. Now let’s add an editor, who instead of now correcting it decides to add his own clarifying footnotes to explain what LRH really meant or, through sloppiness, misplacing pages and lord knows what else – mixes up the chapters so some are not only in the wrong sequence, but entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter, and that’s just the beginning of the list which explains why you’ll even if sometimes found LRH saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier, and if you don’t remember any of these examples from the books, that only makes my point – YOU WENT TOTALLY BLANK!<br>
 +
:[<i>audience standing up, clapping and cheering</i>]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
:And if that’s a sampling, I assure you it’s not even a half of it, then again you can be just as certain that I wouldn’t be standing here telling you this unless each and every alteration, and I do mean every distortion, perversion, and alteration has now been corrected.<br>
 +
:[<i>audience standing up, clapping and cheering</i>]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address:<br>
 +
[http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html]<br>
 +
This key statement starts at 24:55 time marker of the video.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Let’s look at some of the things David Miscavige has listed in his key statement:<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<font size="+1">“... entirely missing chapters...”</font><br>
 +
<br>
 +
David Miscavige removed a whooping 18 chapters from [http://www.truelrh.com/6512_NSOL/alter_NSOL.html <i>A New Slant on Life</i>] replacing it with fewer chapters many of which are readily available in other introductory books.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
An important 9 pages long chapter – “Advice to the Pre-clear” – was removed from [http://www.truelrh.com/5005_DMSMH/alter_DMSMH.html <i>Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health</i>].<br>
 +
<br>
 +
8 pages long original Preface detailing a specific route of training in Scientology was removed from [http://www.truelrh.com/5503_COHA/alter_COHA.html <i>The Creation of Human Ability</i>] and replaced with what looks like a letter from LRH less than a page in length and containing no specific information on Scientology training or on the use of the book. The Preface that Miscavige eliminated also effectively exposes his "Basics" program to force every parishioner to study all the basic books (about a dozen) and hundreds of hours of lectures that accompany them before having any thorough practice as being in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to specific instructions left by the Founder, L. Ron Hubbard.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<font size="+1">"... total garbles... "</font><br>
 +
<br>
 +
Many of the sentences and indeed entire paragraphs were reworded in 2007 editions actually resulting in "total garbles." A few simple examples:<br>
 +
<br>
 +
In [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] a sentence "Workability rather than <b>Idealism</b> has been consulted." in 2007 was changed to "Workability rather than <b>Truth</b> has been consulted."<br>
 +
<br>
 
[[File:Science of Survival 1st edition cover.jpg|thumb|150px|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/Science_of_Survival_-_Alterations|Science of Survival - Alterations]]
 
[[File:Science of Survival 1st edition cover.jpg|thumb|150px|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/Science_of_Survival_-_Alterations|Science of Survival - Alterations]]
 
+
In [http://www.truelrh.com/5106_SOS/alter_SOS.html <i>Science of Survival</i>] a phrase "the individual <b>descends</b> the scale" in 2007 was changed to "the individual <b>decreases</b> on the scale"; a phrase "all <b>unexpressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief, and apathy" was changed to "all <b>expressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief and apathy"; or how about "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Hamlet or play Bach</b> on the piano" in 2007 changed to "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Bach or play Hamlet</b> on the piano.”<br>
 
+
<br>
It should be noted that the modern day Church of Scientology does not currently publish any of the original Dianetics and Scientology basic books as they were authored by the Founder of the movement L. Ron Hubbard (LRH for short) himself. All of Ron’s basic books were changed and distorted in many different ways, and it is these highly distorted materials that are falsely advertised and sold to the public as the original works of LRH. Every modern day publication even carries a disclaimer at the beginning of each book (titled TO THE READER) stating the false claim:
+
These are just few examples. In <i>Science of Survival</i> alone there are 200 some instances of alterations in wording alone – this is not including literally thousands of alterations in punctuation. By "instance" is meant a whole sentence or a larger block of text that has various alterations in it, not single words that were changed which would obviously be a lot more than 200.<br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
“This book is presented in its original form and is part of L. Ron Hubbard’s religious literature and works…”
+
<font size="+1">“... parts of the text specifically said to be deleted by LRH but left in anyway causing complete mystery...”</font><br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
David Miscavige (re)introduced terms Abnormal Dianetics and Dynamics Dianetics into [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] – these are "dead” phrases that are not clearly defined or used anywhere else in Ron Hubbard’s works. At the same time David Miscavige DELETED a key paragraph DEFINING AN "ENGRAM" – a key term at the core of the entire subject of Dianetics.<br>
In reality, not a single one of the new editions is “presented in its original form” as it was authored and legally copyrighted under the name of L. Ron Hubbard.  This can be easily demonstrated with simple side by side comparison of the actual books.
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
In fact, the current “Chairman of The Board Religious Technology Center and Ecclesiastical Leader of Scientology Religion” (a self-appointed title) David Miscavige (DM for short) presented his “voluminous reasoning”* for why all the books had to be changed in his 2007 “Golden Age of Knowledge: The Basics” event. A number of Miscavige's key statements from the introductory part of his speech were isolated and presented down below. Some of the specific statements he made about different books will be included in the analysis relating to any selected book.
+
 
+
 
+
The purpose of this project is to establish conclusive proof that most of the actual changes found in THE BASICS are in fact for the worse – this is to say that David Miscavige has in fact been covertly undermining the integrity of L. Ron Hubbard's work under the guise of "corrections." This fact will be supported by detailed analysis of the differences between the FINAL PUBLICATIONS** and THE BASICS**. Since alterations are in fact so widespread and extensive, this is currently an ongoing project. When a summary of alterations becomes available for any particular book, it will be made available for viewing on this website.
+
 
+
 
+
Note, though it is true that at the event David Miscavige generally presented some supposed flaws in INITIAL PUBLICATIONS** to justify changing the books, it also true that most of the basic books were first published in the early to mid-1950’s giving Ron Hubbard around 30 years to make any revisions and corrections to make sure the books were exactly as he intended.  This is to say that if someone knew that an updated and standardized line of work already existed in the 70’s, as should be the case with DM, and yet proceeded to invalidate and change the materials using some discovered flaws in the very first publications 20, 30 years prior - this in itself would constitute deceptive manipulation of facts to justify subversive activities. Again, all of this confusion resolves rather quickly once the original books that were last in use (i.e. FINAL PUBLICATIONS) are compared side by side with THE BASICS.
+
 
+
 
+
Below is a list of selected statements made by David Miscavige during the introductory portion of the 2007 Basics release event (full name: "Golden Age of Knowledge: The Basics"). The time marks are for the DVD version of this event. About 3 minutes and 10 seconds (3:10) should be subtracted from these marks to get the ones for the Internet version of this video which is available on the official Church of Scientology website: [http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html]
+
 
+
 
+
 
[[File:HOM thumb.jpg|thumb|150px|left|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/A_History_of_Man_-_Alterations|A History of Man - Alterations]]
 
[[File:HOM thumb.jpg|thumb|150px|left|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/A_History_of_Man_-_Alterations|A History of Man - Alterations]]
[04:25] If the reality hasn’t sunk in yet, it soon will – this is THE EVENT you’ve been waiting for.
+
<font size="+1">"... take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends..."</font><br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
The semicolon in [http://www.truelrh.com/5106_SOS/alter_SOS.html <i>Science of Survival</i>] was used according to the rules of English grammar. Numerous “corrections” in punctuation actually resulted in grammatical errors such as run-on sentences, comma splice, and incomplete sentences that are missing either a subject or a verb – this is to say nothing of inevitable distortion in meaning and emphasis that came with changing punctuation. David Miscavige himself "impressed" the audience by stating that there were 3825 "corrections" in punctuation – this is in <i>Science of Survival</i> alone.<br>
[04:39] With what you are about to see this evening there really is no need for superlatives or hyberbole so let me just set the agenda with the most FACTUAL statements I could make, statements containing NO EMBELLISHMENT.
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
<font size="+1">"... Now let’s add an editor, who instead of now correcting it decides to add his own clarifying footnotes to explain what LRH really meant... "</font><br>
[05:23] For what we release tonight is not something effecting only the lower end of the Bridge or merely the upper end but the very pillar upon which literary rests the entire Bridge itself.
+
<br>
 
+
There are practically NO clarifying footnotes in any of the original publications. The overwhelming amount of footnotes throughout the books appeared in the first batch of distorted books released within a few years following the official death of the Founder in 1986. This is the time when David Miscavige was already taking hold of the organization as its new leader. Specifically, the excessive number of footnotes that Miscavige flashed on the screen for [http://www.truelrh.com/5111_AP-A/alter_AP-A.html <i>Advanced Procedure and Axioms</i>] was from 1989 edition copyrighted under "L. Ron Hubbard Library" [ISBN: 0-88404-419-X].<br>
[[File:FOT thumb.jpg|thumb|150px|right|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/Fundamentals_of_Thought_-_Alterations|Fundamentals of thought Alterations]]
+
<br>
[05:47] For tonight’s release won't just make it possible to be a Scientologist like you've never dreamed, it will provide an entirely new definition of what it means to be a Scientologist and with an ease that defies definition.
+
<br>
 
+
 
+
[06:21] If we’ve already said it's the greatest recovery of lost tech in Dianetics and Scientology then let's rephrase it - the recovery of Dianetics and Scientology, period!
+
 
+
 
+
[7:18] Ok, of course with a list of statements like that I just made, it had better be big. [audience laughter] Needless to say, it is! Indeed, and as I said, that’s no embellishment, no hype, and none of it intended just to create an effect.
+
 
+
 
+
[20:57 - 22:15] The fact remains that the data contained in the basic books are very foundation upon which all Dianetics and Scientology rests. So if we are going to speak of a Golden Age of Knowledge, indeed, if your route to the top requires TOTAL KNOWLEDGE, then the data needs to be part of your vocabulary. After all, we aren’t just speaking of the reactive mind and its anatomy, we are also speaking of the very axioms of Dianetics and Scientology, and they are called AXIOMS for a reason.
+
 
+
 
+
But what if I told you that you could know these materials so well that they literary are part of your very fabric. And what if I said you not only could know the discoveries, but even how they came about: how LRH discovered the whole track, the energy of life itself, the illusory nature of the MEST universe - all of it. In fact, what if I told you that you not only could fully understand the axioms, but you’d know them so well, you’d even know why they ARE the axioms, without even thinking about it. Or let’s go one step further - the Factors. What if I told you that studied correctly you’d be inviting the toughest Flag supervisor to give you a check out AFTER ONE TIME THROUGH! Well, I am saying that, and a whole lot more.
+
 
+
 
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 
{| class="wikitable" align="right"
 
|-
 
|-
Line 59: Line 75:
 
"Fundamentals of Thought" see [[Fundamentals of Thought - Alterations]]
 
"Fundamentals of Thought" see [[Fundamentals of Thought - Alterations]]
 
|}
 
|}
[24:11] As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program EVER! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious - without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it entailed when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.
+
<font size="+1">"... misplacing pages..."</font><br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
David Miscavige took sections of text out of two chapters in the beginning of [http://www.truelrh.com/5609_FOT/alter_FOT.html <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>] and placed them toward the END of the book. And just to mention it here, the very definition of Scientology as a subject was re-written in <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>, and nearly all the references to Scientology being a "science" were removed and in some instances replaced with a word "religion."<br>
[26:23 - 29:40] Because where it's headed is not just the full recovery of the books but so much more including literary discovering lost tech and I do mean hidden from view that surrounds these books.
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
So once again, the question: how does one loose tech? MISUNDERSTOODS. And who's were they? THE TRANSCRIPTIONIST’s. Yes, you heard me: the transcriptionist’s. And here is what I mean. With a lecture, you hear LRH and the words he said. In a policy letter, you read them as he hand-wrote or typed them. Yet the books, with only one exception, were dictated. Meaning, he spoke them into a tape recorder and they were typed by a transcriptionist. You get LRH’s words as he or she relaid them, and when that person had a misunderstood, you get this: distortions, alterations and perversions, some little, some huge, but every one of them - a hang up for the reader, and that’s why I said you can look up every single word in one of these book and still not get it because when you track it out across the entire LRH library, you get such alterations as entirely missing chapters, total garbles, parts of the text specifically said to be deleted by LRH but left in anyway causing complete mystery; transcription errors whereby LRH dictates a sentence and then replaces it with another, but the transcriptionist was too lazy to go back and correct it leaving both sentences in the book. And if that’s not enough, take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends. Now let’s add an editor, who instead of now correcting it decides to add his own clarifying footnotes to explain what LRH really meant or, through sloppiness, misplacing pages and lord knows what else – mixes up the chapters so some are not only in the wrong sequence, but entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter, and that’s just the beginning of the list which explains why you’ll even if sometimes found LRH saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier, and if you don’t remember any of these examples from the books, that only makes my point – YOU WENT TOTALLY BLANK!
+
<font size="+1">"... mixes up the chapters..."</font><br>
[<i>audience standing up, clapping and cheering</i>]
+
<br>
 
+
For [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] David Miscavige said that "... many of the chapters as currently published were in the wrong sequence..." where only ONE chapter was moved in 2007 edition and most likely incorrectly so.<br>
And if that’s a sampling, I assure you it’s not even a half of it, then again you can be just as certain that I wouldn’t be standing here telling you this unless each and every alteration, and I do mean every distortion, perversion, and alteration has now been corrected.
+
<br>
[<i>audience standing up, clapping and cheering</i>].
+
As was already stated, David Miscavige also removed the original Preface from [http://www.truelrh.com/5503_COHA/alter_COHA.html <i>The Creation of Human Ability</i>] which provided specific instructions on how various parts of the book were supposed to be used in training a new student in Scientology. Instead, David Miscavige reorganized the chapters according to chronological order of the various issues that comprised it. He also placed a great bulk of them in the "References" section making it seem like they were somehow optional or non-essential. Obviously, lacking specific instructions from the Founder, new readers will now have no idea as to the original purpose of those issues to begin with.<br>
 
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
[<i>after digital animations and rolling out a massive display of new materials onto the stage</i>]
+
<font size="+1">"... entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter..."</font><br>
 
+
<br>
[37:27 - 38:38] So there you have the Basics – Dianetics to Scientology - and the very foundation of the subjects complete. Just in case you missed it, we are not speaking of “corrected” manuscripts, not “newly verified” manuscripts, and DEFINITELY not just “repackaged.” What we are speaking of is a 100% unadulterated source. Furthermore, we are not merely speaking of books, but when you add the lectures that have never been available, the 100% recovery of source on every technological advance from discovery of engrams and the reactive mind to operating thetan to the breakthroughs in principles applied in every auditing session today at every level of the Bridge.
+
[[File:FOT thumb.jpg|thumb|150px|right|link=http://scientolipedia.org/info/Fundamentals_of_Thought_-_Alterations|Fundamentals of thought Alterations]]
 
+
In [http://www.truelrh.com/5111_AP-A/alter_AP-A.html <i>Advanced Procedure and Axioms</i>] David Miscavige simply took a portion of text form the end of chapter titled "Effort Processing" and placed it in the preceding chapter titled "Effort." During the event he showed an animation to convince the audience that one chapter "Effort Processing" was placed within another "Effort" when in fact "Effort Processing" naturally FOLLOWED a chapter on "Effort." When you actually LOOK at the section of text that he moved, it becomes quite clear that the text belongs where it was – at the end of "Effort Processing" chapter. There was absolutely no reason for moving the text other then to fabricate some "proof" that there was something wrong.<br>
Indeed, combine it all and it lays out like this: I can walk off this stage in the next 30 seconds after simply telling you to read and listen in sequence, and I would KNOW that you would fly. In fact, I'd know if you did just that - read and listened in sequence - by the end of your study you'd know the basics of Dianetics and Scientology better than any Dianeticist or Scientologist from 1950 right up to the present time.
+
<br>
[audience standing up, clapping and cheering]
+
<br>
 
+
<font size="+1">"... you’ll even if sometimes found LRH saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier... "</font><br>
 
+
<br>
*”Voluminous reasoning” is a phrase that comes from a passage in the “Science of Survival” book:
+
So far no such instances were located in the original publications.<br>
 
+
<br>
“From 2.0 down to 1.2, efforts to change people or dominate them are recognizable as such. From 1.2 down, all forthrightness vanishes, and the most devious and insidious and complex methods are employed to nullify. The individual in this area of the tone scale very often has a complete belief in his or her superiority, which is a justification for using the methods he uses. Such people commonly fasten themselves on strong personalities well up the tone scale and then continue to assert their superiority without ever giving, of course, any demonstration that the superiority exists, until the higher level becomes nullified. The individual in this area seeks death not only for himself and his own projects but also for his entire environment. At this level we have murder, by slow erosion, of individuals and the culture, each harmful action being masked with voluminous “reasoning.””
+
<br>
 
+
David Miscavige also bluntly lied to parishioners that in [http://www.truelrh.com/5005_DEOS/alter_DEOS.html <i>The Evolution of a Science</i>] there was some confusing footnote that was "erroneously included in all published editions" which had to be removed – there is NO such footnote in 1977 reprint which was used in this review.<br>
[“Science of Survival” by L. Ron Hubbard, pages 159-160 in 1975 printing or page 186 in 2007]
+
<br>
 
+
David Miscavige then lied that the phrase "Life Continuum" was changed to "Life Continuation" in [http://www.truelrh.com/5112_HFP/alter_HFP.html <i>Handbook for Preclears</i>] and that "nobody's ever really known what it meant" because "it's not in the book." BOTH PHRASES – Life Continuum and Life Continuation – can be located in the very first publication (1951) and in 1976 printing, and absolutely NOTHING CHANGED in the use of those phrases in a supposedly "corrected" 2007 edition. The phrase "Life Continuum" was also in plain sight defined in <i>Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary</i> since its first publication in 1975!<br>
 
+
<br>
** Basic materials of Dianetics and Scientology could be said to consist of six major categories:
+
<br>
 
+
At this point you may want to ask yourself: if the books that are publicly available and easily verified were so bluntly distorted under false premises currently broadcasted straight from the [http://www.truelrh.com/http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html official Scientology website], what could have been done to the training materials and especially the confidential OT materials that are not as readily available or easily verifiable as to their authenticity and correctness? Perhaps, David Miscavige himself hints at the answer to this question with another one of his statements during the event: (21:03 time marker of the video):<br>
INITIAL PUBLICATIONS: the very first editions and publications of the books (mostly 1950's)
+
<br>
 
+
:As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.<br>
INTERMEDIARY PUBLICATIONS: subsequent editions and reprints
+
<br>
 
+
Is David Miscavige trying to say here is that he changed the TRAINING, the OT LEVELS, and the ORGANIZATION itself in a similar wise as what he has done with the books?
FINAL PUBLICATIONS: last publications of the books under supervision of the author L. Ron Hubbard (mostly mid 70's) published by the original Church of Scientology of California.
+
 
+
ALTERED FORM EDITIONS: these are the books published in the early 1980's by Bridge Publications or New Era Productions (in Europe) after corporate restructuring. They were slightly bigger in form but contained text that was still copyrighted under L. Ron Hubbard.
+
 
+
"LIBRARY" EDITIONS (before "the Basics"): after the official death of Ron Hubbard in 1986 books began to be published under copyright "L Ron Hubbard Library." This is where alterations to the text itself begin to take place.
+
 
+
THE BASICS: the last batch of highly distorted books released in 2007 and falsely advertised as "pure unadulterated source."
+
  
 +
= Find Original Versions =
 +
'''Own your own original versions of L Ron Hubbard's books - available at [https://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&toolid=11800&pub=undefined&campid=5338312792&mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dp2380057.m570.l1312.R1.TR11.TRC4.A0.H1.Xscientology.TRS1%26_nkw%3Dscientology%2Bbooks%26_sacat%3D102545 EBay]'''
  
 
= Related Pages =
 
= Related Pages =
Line 108: Line 119:
  
 
== [http://scientolipedia.org/info/Admin_Scale#Tech_Preservation_projects project page] ==
 
== [http://scientolipedia.org/info/Admin_Scale#Tech_Preservation_projects project page] ==
 
+
= comments =
 
{{DISQUS}}
 
{{DISQUS}}
  
[[Category:Library]]
+
[[Category:Library]][[Category:Books about Scientology]]

Latest revision as of 14:07, May 22, 2018

ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign

wwww.trueLRH.com
Note: You can own your own original versions of L Ron Hubbard's books - available at EBay


There is no better way to start this summary than to quote what David Miscavige presented as his “summary” of all the things that were supposedly wrong with the original publications and show how the things that he listed are actually the things that HE did to undermine the works of L. Ron Hubbard in creating his batch of distorted books called THE BASICS.

David Miscavige giving Scientologists the false premise for the

alterations he introduced into the books of L Ron Hubbard

Because where it's headed is not just the full recovery of the books but so much more including literally discovering lost techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65), and I do mean hidden from view, that surrounds these books.


So once again, the question: how does one lose techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65)? MISUNDERSTOODS. And whose were they? THE TRANSCRIPTIONIST’s. Yes, you heard me: the transcriptionist’s. And here is what I mean. With a lecture, you hear LRHL. Ron Hubbard and the words he said. In a policy letter, you read them as he hand-wrote or typed them. Yet the books, with only one exception, were dictated. Meaning, he spoke them into a tape recorder and they were typed by a transcriptionist. You get LRHL. Ron Hubbard’s words as he or she relayed them, and when that person had a misunderstood, you get this: distortions, alterations and perversions, some little, some huge, but every one of them – a hang up for the reader, and that’s whyThat basic outness found which will lead to a recovery of stats. (HCO PL 13 Oct 70 II) I said you can look up every single word in one of these book and still not get it because when you track it out across the entire LRHL. Ron Hubbard library, you get such alterations as entirely missing chapters; total garbles; parts of the text specifically said to be deleted by LRHL. Ron Hubbard but left in anyway causing complete mystery; transcription errors whereby LRHL. Ron Hubbard dictates a sentence and then replaces it with another, but the transcriptionist was too lazy to go back and correct it leaving both sentences in the book. And if that’s not enough, take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends. Now let’s add an editor, who instead of now correcting it decides to add his own clarifying footnotes to explain what LRHL. Ron Hubbard really meant or, through sloppiness, misplacing pages and lord knows what else – mixes up the chapters so some are not only in the wrong sequence, but entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter, and that’s just the beginning of the list which explains whyThat basic outness found which will lead to a recovery of stats. (HCO PL 13 Oct 70 II) you’ll even if sometimes found LRHL. Ron Hubbard saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier, and if you don’t remember any of these examples from the books, that only makes my point – YOU WENT TOTALLY BLANK!
[audience standing up, clapping and cheering]


And if that’s a sampling, I assure you it’s not even a half of it, then again you can be just as certain that I wouldn’t be standing here telling you this unless each and every alteration, and I do mean every distortion, perversion, and alteration has now been corrected.
[audience standing up, clapping and cheering]


You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address:
http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html
This key statement starts at 24:55 time marker of the video.


Let’s look at some of the things David Miscavige has listed in his key statement:


“... entirely missing chapters...”

David Miscavige removed a whooping 18 chapters from A New Slant on Life replacing it with fewer chapters many of which are readily available in other introductory books.

An important 9 pages long chapter – “Advice to the Pre-clear” – was removed from Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.

8 pages long original Preface detailing a specific route of training in Scientology was removed from The Creation of Human Ability and replaced with what looks like a letter from LRHL. Ron Hubbard less than a page in length and containing no specific information on Scientology training or on the use of the book. The Preface that Miscavige eliminated also effectively exposes his "Basics" program to forcel. random effort. (Scn 0-8, p. 75) 2. energy with some direction. (PDC 56) 3. force of course is made up of time, matter, energy, flows, particles, masses, solids, liquids, gasses, space and locations. (HCOB 16 Jun 70) every parishioner to study all the basic books (about a dozen) and hundreds of hours of lectures that accompany them before having any thorough practice as being in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to specific instructions left by the Founder, L. Ron Hubbard.


"... total garbles... "

Many of the sentences and indeed entire paragraphs were reworded in 2007 editions actually resulting in "total garbles." A few simple examples:

In The Original Thesis a sentence "Workability rather than Idealism has been consulted." in 2007 was changed to "Workability rather than Truth has been consulted."

Science of Survival - Alterations

In Science of Survival a phrase "the individual descends the scale" in 2007 was changed to "the individual decreases on the scale"; a phrase "all unexpressed resentment, anger1. true anger is a hate hold. At exactly 1.5 on the tone scale we have a total ridge. It’s hate. When we move a little above or a little below 1.5 we get a dispersal. (5904C08) 2. anger is simply the process of trying to hold everything still. (5203CM09A), fear, grief, and apathy" was changed to "all expressed resentment, anger1. true anger is a hate hold. At exactly 1.5 on the tone scale we have a total ridge. It’s hate. When we move a little above or a little below 1.5 we get a dispersal. (5904C08) 2. anger is simply the process of trying to hold everything still. (5203CM09A), fear, grief and apathy"; or how about "regardless of their ability to quote Hamlet or play Bach on the piano" in 2007 changed to "regardless of their ability to quote Bach or play Hamlet on the piano.”

These are just few examples. In Science of Survival alone there are 200 some instances of alterations in wording alone – this is not including literally thousands of alterations in punctuation. By "instance" is meant a whole sentence or a larger block of text that has various alterations in it, not single words that were changed which would obviously be a lot more than 200.


“... parts of the text specifically said to be deleted by LRHL. Ron Hubbard but left in anyway causing complete mystery...”

David Miscavige (re)introduced terms Abnormal Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more and Dynamics Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more into The Original Thesis – these are "dead” phrases that are not clearly defined or used anywhere else in Ron Hubbard’s works. At the same time David Miscavige DELETED a key paragraph DEFINING AN "ENGRAM" – a key term at the core of the entire subject of Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more.


A History of Man - Alterations

"... take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends..."

The semicolon in Science of Survival was used according to the rules of English grammar. Numerous “corrections” in punctuation actually resulted in grammatical errors such as runUndergo processing. (Science of Survival, p.75)-on sentences, comma splice, and incomplete sentences that are missing either a subject or a verb – this is to say nothing of inevitable distortion in meaning and emphasis that came with changing punctuation. David Miscavige himself "impressed" the audience by stating that there were 3825 "corrections" in punctuation – this is in Science of Survival alone.


"... Now let’s add an editor, who instead of now correcting it decides to add his own clarifying footnotes to explain what LRHL. Ron Hubbard really meant... "

There are practically NO clarifying footnotes in any of the original publications. The overwhelming amount of footnotes throughout the books appeared in the first batch of distorted books released within a few years following the official death of the Founder in 1986. This is the time when David Miscavige was already taking hold of the organization as its new leader. Specifically, the excessive number of footnotes that Miscavige flashed on the screen for Advanced Procedure and Axioms was from 1989 edition copyrighted under "L. Ron Hubbard Library" [ISBN: 0-88404-419-X].


Sample of lies about the original versions of L Ron Hubbard's book

"Fundamentals of Thought" see Fundamentals of Thought - Alterations

"... misplacing pages..."

David Miscavige took sections of text out of two chapters in the beginning of Fundamentals of Thought and placed them toward the END of the book. And just to mention it here, the very definition of Scientology as a subject was re-written in Fundamentals of Thought, and nearly all the references to Scientology being a "science" were removed and in some instances replaced with a word "religion."


"... mixes up the chapters..."

For The Original Thesis David Miscavige said that "... many of the chapters as currently published were in the wrong sequence..." where only ONE chapter was moved in 2007 edition and most likely incorrectly so.

As was already stated, David Miscavige also removed the original Preface from The Creation of Human Ability which provided specific instructions on how various parts of the book were supposed to be used in training a new student in Scientology. Instead, David Miscavige reorganized the chapters according to chronological order of the various issues that comprised it. He also placed a great bulk of them in the "References" section making it seem like they were somehow optional or non-essential. Obviously, lacking specific instructions from the Founder, new readers will now have no idea as to the original purpose of those issues to begin with.


"... entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter..."

Fundamentals of thought Alterations

In Advanced Procedure and Axioms David Miscavige simply took a portion of text form the end of chapter titled "Effort Processing" and placed it in the preceding chapter titled "Effort." During the event he showed an animation to convince the audience that one chapter "Effort Processing" was placed within another "Effort" when in fact "Effort Processing" naturally FOLLOWED a chapter on "Effort." When you actually LOOK at the section of text that he moved, it becomes quite clear that the text belongs where it was – at the end of "Effort Processing" chapter. There was absolutely no reason for moving the text other then to fabricate some "proof" that there was something wrong.


"... you’ll even if sometimes found LRHL. Ron Hubbard saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier... "

So far no such instances were located in the original publications.


David Miscavige also bluntly lied to parishioners that in The Evolution of a Science there was some confusing footnote that was "erroneously included in all published editions" which had to be removed – there is NO such footnote in 1977 reprint which was used in this review.

David Miscavige then lied that the phrase "Life Continuum" was changed to "Life Continuation" in Handbook for Preclears and that "nobody's ever really known what it meant" because "it's not in the book." BOTH PHRASES – Life Continuum and Life Continuation – can be located in the very first publication (1951) and in 1976 printing, and absolutely NOTHING CHANGED in the use of those phrases in a supposedly "corrected" 2007 edition. The phrase "Life Continuum" was also in plain sight defined in Dianetics1. DIA (Greek) through, NOUS (Greek) mind, deals with a system of mental image pictures in relation to psychic (spiritual) trauma. The mental image pictures are believed on the basis of personal revelation to be comprising mental activity created and formed by the spirit, and not by the body or brain. (BPL 24 Sept 73 V) 2. Dn addresses the body. Thus Dn is used to knock out and erase illnesses, unwanted sensations, misemotion, somatics, pain, etc. Dn came before Scn. It disposed of body illness and the difficulties a thetan was having with his body. (HCOB 22 Apr 69)...more and Scientology Technical Dictionary since its first publication in 1975!


At this point you may want to ask yourself: if the books that are publicly available and easily verified were so bluntly distorted under false premises currently broadcasted straight from the official Scientology website, what could have been done to the training materials and especially the confidential OTOperating Thetan - 7. this state of being is attained by drills and familiarity after the state of Clear has been obtained. A real OT has no reactive bank, is cause over matter, energy, space, time and thought and is completely free. (HCOB 12 Jul 65)...More materials that are not as readily available or easily verifiable as to their authenticity and correctness? Perhaps, David Miscavige himself hints at the answer to this question with another one of his statements during the event: (21:03 time marker of the video):

As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTCReligious Technology Center program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OTOperating Thetan - 7. this state of being is attained by drills and familiarity after the state of Clear has been obtained. A real OT has no reactive bank, is cause over matter, energy, space, time and thought and is completely free. (HCOB 12 Jul 65)...More’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal OrgsShort for organization. (HCO PL 8 Sept 69) – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65), pure techAbbreviation for technology. The methods of application of an art or science as opposed to mere knowledge of the science or art itself. (HCOB 13 Sep 65), nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.


Is David Miscavige trying to say here is that he changed the TRAINING, the OTOperating Thetan - 7. this state of being is attained by drills and familiarity after the state of Clear has been obtained. A real OT has no reactive bank, is cause over matter, energy, space, time and thought and is completely free. (HCOB 12 Jul 65)...More LEVELS, and the ORGANIZATION itself in a similar wise as what he has done with the books?

Find Original Versions

Own your own original versions of L Ron Hubbard's books - available at EBay

Related Pages

project page

comments

comments powered by Disqus