This is the old (read-only) version of the site running Mediwiki 1.25

Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Two Happiness Rundowns/How LRHL. Ron Hubbard Developed Rundowns"

From Scientolipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New thread: How LRH Developed Rundowns)
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''excerpted from email correspondence on the topic of the HRD.''
+
On 8 January 2016 Kenneth G. Urquhart wrote the following comment on Max Hauri's entry. [[User:AntPhillips|Antony A Phillips]] ([[User talk:AntPhillips|talk]]) 03:13, January 14, 2016 (CST) :
  
In my day, [[L Ron Hubbard|LRH]] would develop a new rundown using the auditors to hand locally to begin the experimental auditing.He would work with the c/s who was in charge of the auditors but LRH would usually see the folders too.
+
This has been transferred to the main page see under the heading:<br />
 
+
'''From Ken Urquhart; Earlier Preparation of Rundowns,1969/75.'''
And he would have daily conferences with the c/s about the folders and what was happening with the preclears.
+
 
+
When he was satisfied that he had a good product, he would have the c/s write up the hcobs -- often from the c/s's notes of conferences he'd had with LRH as the rundown developed. The c/s would also submit a list of the most common errors he'd seen the auditors committing on this new RD and that would be the basis of the RD's correction list.
+
 
+
I was not on that line when they developed the HRD but I would bet that the same procedure applied. Because [[David Mayo]], who would
+
have been the c/s on this pilot, "wrote the issues," his initials followed LRH's on the ascription at the bottom.  
+
 
+
Compiling the RD's issues would have been a cooperative effort involving LRH and David Mayo.
+
 
+
To say that David Mayo wrote the HRD issues is a misstatement.
+
 
+
Yes, he sat at a typewriter and typed up the HCOBs' texts from his notes of discussing the sessions with LRH. He would have sent these
+
draft issues to LRH for approval. If LRH didn't want to approve anything he didn't. If he wanted something changed, he changed it
+
or had it changed. If David Mayo had had an idea of his own and wanted it added to the RD or to an HCOB above and beyond what
+
LRH had uttered in their meetings, David would have run it by LRH before sending it in for approval to issue.
+
 
+
I'd say that the same procedure applied to the NOTs materials.
+
 
+
[[Ken Urquhart]]
+

Latest revision as of 09:32, July 29, 2016

On 8 January 2016 Kenneth G. Urquhart wrote the following comment on Max Hauri's entry. Antony A Phillips (talk) 03:13, January 14, 2016 (CSTChurch of Spiritual Technology (Senior to, and part of the corporate structure of the churches of Scientology)) :

This has been transferred to the main page see under the heading:
From Ken Urquhart; Earlier Preparation of Rundowns,1969/75.