Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Rolf dane/Blanking the DEEP Clearing article/reply (2)"
From Scientolipedia
(Reply to Blanking the DEEP Clearing article) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 21:23, September 1, 2015
I understand your wanting to distance yourself from what you see as a toxic brand, but the request compromises our integrity. If we alter or delete factual data about derivative practices of Scientology to appease people, we become less credible.
I have spoken with Antony and was waiting to hear from you before deciding about restoring the page.
We have to consider whether it is important to document ALL of the offshoots, SOME of the offshoots, or NONE of the offshoots. Do we postA position from which a terminal operates in an org, where one knows that somebody is at. (FO 2200)
a disclaimer that SOME offshoots wish to remain anonymous due to the church's abuse of the brand? Maybe that is the solution...
