User:Eugenek/sandbox1 - Revision history

Dl88008: removed Library category

2014-02-08T04:43:20Z

removed Library category

Eugenek at 01:16, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T01:16:47Z

Eugenek at 01:14, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T01:14:48Z

Eugenek at 01:13, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T01:13:05Z

Eugenek at 01:06, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T01:06:42Z

Eugenek at 01:01, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T01:01:17Z

Eugenek at 00:56, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T00:56:04Z

Eugenek at 00:51, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T00:51:42Z

Eugenek at 00:48, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T00:48:37Z

Eugenek at 00:47, November 26, 2013

2013-11-26T00:47:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, February 8, 2014
Line 116:		Line 116:
	= comments =		= comments =
	{{DISQUS}}		{{DISQUS}}
−
−	~~[[Category:Library]]~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <div align="center"><b>ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY</b><br>
 <u><b>SUMMARY OF FINDINGS</b></u><br>
-Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign </div><br>
+Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign<br>
 <br>
 There is no better way to start this summary than to quote what David Miscavige presented as his “summary” of all the things that were supposedly wrong with the original publications and show how the things that he listed are actually the things that HE did to undermine the works of L. Ron Hubbard in creating his batch of distorted books called THE BASICS.<br>

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 <font size="+1">"... misplacing pages..."</font><br>
 <br>
 David Miscavige took sections of text out of two chapters in the beginning of [http://www.truelrh.com/5609_FOT/alter_FOT.html <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>] and placed them toward the END of the book. And just to mention it here, the very definition of Scientology as a subject was re-written in <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>, and nearly all the references to Scientology being a "science" were removed and in some instances replaced with a word "religion."<br>
 <br>
@@ Line 87: / Line 86: @@
 <font size="+1">"... entire chapters appear in the middle of another chapter..."</font><br>
 <br>
 In [http://www.truelrh.com/5111_AP-A/alter_AP-A.html <i>Advanced Procedure and Axioms</i>] David Miscavige simply took a portion of text form the end of chapter titled "Effort Processing" and placed it in the preceding chapter titled "Effort." During the event he showed an animation to convince the audience that one chapter "Effort Processing" was placed within another "Effort" when in fact "Effort Processing" naturally FOLLOWED a chapter on "Effort." When you actually LOOK at the section of text that he moved, it becomes quite clear that the text belongs where it was – at the end of "Effort Processing" chapter. There was absolutely no reason for moving the text other then to fabricate some "proof" that there was something wrong.<br>
 <br>

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 In [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] a sentence "Workability rather than <b>Idealism</b> has been consulted." in 2007 was changed to "Workability rather than <b>Truth</b> has been consulted."<br>
 <br>
 In [http://www.truelrh.com/5106_SOS/alter_SOS.html <i>Science of Survival</i>] a phrase "the individual <b>descends</b> the scale" in 2007 was changed to "the individual <b>decreases</b> on the scale"; a phrase "all <b>unexpressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief, and apathy" was changed to "all <b>expressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief and apathy"; or how about "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Hamlet or play Bach</b> on the piano" in 2007 changed to "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Bach or play Hamlet</b> on the piano.”<br>
 <br>
@@ Line 53: / Line 54: @@
 <br>
 <br>
 <font size="+1">"... take your “garden variety” transcription error where the typist isn’t sure whether they should punctuate with a period, colon, or a comma and in almost every instance deciding to go with a happy medium and using a semicolon – a total “maybe” and resulting in sentences, indeed paragraphs, where you don’t know where the sentence begins or ends..."</font><br>
 <br>
@@ Line 72: / Line 74: @@
 <font size="+1">"... misplacing pages..."</font><br>
 <br>
 David Miscavige took sections of text out of two chapters in the beginning of [http://www.truelrh.com/5609_FOT/alter_FOT.html <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>] and placed them toward the END of the book. And just to mention it here, the very definition of Scientology as a subject was re-written in <i>Fundamentals of Thought</i>, and nearly all the references to Scientology being a "science" were removed and in some instances replaced with a word "religion."<br>
 <br>

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Many of the sentences and indeed entire paragraphs were reworded in 2007 editions actually resulting in "total garbles." A few simple examples:<br>
 <br>
-In [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] a sentence "Workability rather than <b>Idealism</b> has been consulted.</font>" in 2007 was changed to "Workability rather than <b>Truth</b> has been consulted."<br>
+In [http://www.truelrh.com/4801_DOT/alter_DOT.html <i>The Original Thesis</i>] a sentence "Workability rather than <b>Idealism</b> has been consulted." in 2007 was changed to "Workability rather than <b>Truth</b> has been consulted."<br>
 <br>
 In [http://www.truelrh.com/5106_SOS/alter_SOS.html <i>Science of Survival</i>] a phrase "the individual <b>descends</b> the scale" in 2007 was changed to "the individual <b>decreases</b> on the scale"; a phrase "all <b>unexpressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief, and apathy" was changed to "all <b>expressed</b> resentment, anger, fear, grief and apathy"; or how about "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Hamlet or play Bach</b> on the piano" in 2007 changed to "regardless of their ability to <b>quote Bach or play Hamlet</b> on the piano.”<br>
@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
 <br>
 <br>
-<font size="+1">"... you’ll even if sometimes found LRH saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier... "<br>
+<font size="+1">"... you’ll even if sometimes found LRH saying: “see later text” and yet the text never appears, or he refers to a process with a statement: “as described earlier” yet which never really did appear earlier... "</font><br>
 <br>
 So far no such instances were located in the original publications.<br>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <br>
 There is no better way to start this summary than to quote what David Miscavige presented as his “summary” of all the things that were supposedly wrong with the original publications and show how the things that he listed are actually the things that HE did to undermine the works of L. Ron Hubbard in creating his batch of distorted books called THE BASICS.<br>
 <br>
 :Because where it's headed is not just the full recovery of the books but so much more including literally discovering lost tech, and I do mean hidden from view, that surrounds these books.<br>
@@ Line 55: / Line 62: @@
 <br>
 <br>
 <font size="+1">"... misplacing pages..."</font><br>
 <br>
@@ Line 85: / Line 99: @@
 <br>
 :As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.<br>
 <br>
 Perhaps what David Miscavige is really trying to say here is that he changed the TRAINING, the OT LEVELS, and the ORGANIZATION itself in a very similar wise as what he has done with the books.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div align="center"><b>ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY</b><b><br>
+<div align="center"><b>ALTERATIONS IN THE MATERIALS OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY</b><br>
-</b> <h2><u><b>SUMMARY OF FINDINGS</b></u></h2> Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign </div><br>
+<h2><u><b>SUMMARY OF FINDINGS</b></u></h2> Preliminary Report Addressing "The Basics" Campaign </div><br>
 <br>
 There is no better way to start this summary than to quote what David Miscavige presented as his “summary” of all the things that were supposedly wrong with the original publications and show how the things that he listed are actually the things that HE did to undermine the works of L. Ron Hubbard in creating his batch of distorted books called THE BASICS.<br>
@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 <br>
 <br>
-At this point you may want to ask yourself: if the books that are publicly available and easily verified were so bluntly distorted under false premises currently broadcasted straight from the [http://www.truelrh.com/http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html official Scientology website], what could have been done to the training materials and especially the confidential OT materials that are not as readily available or easily verifiable as to their authenticity and correctness? At this point an attention should be drawn to another one of statements by David Miscavige during the Basics event:<br>
+At this point you may want to ask yourself: if the books that are publicly available and easily verified were so bluntly distorted under false premises currently broadcasted straight from the [http://www.truelrh.com/http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html official Scientology website], what could have been done to the training materials and especially the confidential OT materials that are not as readily available or easily verifiable as to their authenticity and correctness? At this point an attention should be drawn to another one of David Miscavige's statements during the Basics event (21:03 time marker of the video):<br>
 <br>
 :As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.<br>
 You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address:<br>
 <br>
 Perhaps what David Miscavige is really trying to say here is that he changed the TRAINING, the OT LEVELS, and the ORGANIZATION itself in a very similar wise as what he has done with the books.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :And if that’s a sampling, I assure you it’s not even a half of it, then again you can be just as certain that I wouldn’t be standing here telling you this unless each and every alteration, and I do mean every distortion, perversion, and alteration has now been corrected.<br>
 :[<i>audience standing up, clapping and cheering</i>]<br>
- </div><br>
+<br>
-−
 You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address:<br>
 [http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html]<br>
@@ Line 85: / Line 84: @@
 At this point you may want to ask yourself: if the books that are publicly available and easily verified were so bluntly distorted under false premises currently broadcasted straight from the [http://www.truelrh.com/http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html official Scientology website], what could have been done to the training materials and especially the confidential OT materials that are not as readily available or easily verifiable as to their authenticity and correctness? At this point an attention should be drawn to another one of statements by David Miscavige during the Basics event:<br>
 <br>
-:<div>As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.<br></div>
+:As regards KSW, I’ve previously said the Golden Age of Knowledge is the most embracive RTC program ever! Yes, even more than Golden Age of Tech, Golden Age of Tech for OT’s, arbitraries removed, Ideal Orgs – you name it. The reason is obvious – without the tech, pure tech, nothing else is possible and nothing else matters. But if you think anybody knew what it would entail when it came to the books… No! Nobody had a clue.<br>
 You can see the full version of this video on the official Church of Scientology website at this address:<br>
 [http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html http://www.scientology.org/david-miscavige/basic-books-and-lectures.html]<br>