User:AntPhillips/sandbox8 - Revision history

AntPhillips: Inserting correct link

2018-02-20T19:20:11Z

Inserting correct link

AntPhillips: Add demo of footnotes

2017-10-13T13:09:46Z

Add demo of footnotes

AntPhillips: Removing extraneous lines, et cetera.

2017-08-30T17:31:59Z

Removing extraneous lines, et cetera.

Show changes

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-23 - 5904C29 */ formatting (end of job!)

2017-08-30T16:07:15Z

‎SHPA-23 - 5904C29: formatting (end of job!)

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-20 - 5904C28 */ reformatting

2017-08-28T08:21:17Z

‎SHPA-20 - 5904C28: reformatting

AntPhillips: /* Present Time */ remove the empty line

2017-08-22T17:05:14Z

‎Present Time: remove the empty line

AntPhillips: Inset one bit

2017-08-22T17:03:59Z

Inset one bit

AntPhillips: /* Types of Cases */ single word corrected

2017-08-22T17:01:22Z

‎Types of Cases: single word corrected

AntPhillips: /* (Assessment) */ continuing formatting

2017-08-22T16:58:25Z

‎(Assessment): continuing formatting

Show changes

AntPhillips: /* Types of Auditing */ continuing formatting

2017-08-21T07:33:13Z

‎Types of Auditing: continuing formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, February 20, 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	'''''POSTED http://scientolipedia.org/info/~~User:AntPhillips/sandbox8~~ '''''	+	'''''POSTED http://scientolipedia.org/info/Special_HPA_Lecture_Series '''''

	'''[Posted 31st of July 2017, still to be proofread and checked with the author.]'''		'''[Posted 31st of July 2017, still to be proofread and checked with the author.]'''

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-From'''''POSTED  http://scientolipedia.org/info/User:AntPhillips/sandbox8  '''''
 '''[Posted 31st of July 2017, still to be proofread and checked with the author.]'''
-'''''New version being worked on here starting 16th of August '''''
+== Demonstration of footnotes==
 Review by Robin
@@ Line 483: / Line 496: @@
 End of lecture series

@@ Line 464: / Line 464: @@
 :"Now, if we - if we try to categorize children as a special case, and say "Well, children are a special case and you have to be a terrific expert," we would be playing you false. This is not true. The main message on it is children are preclears."
 A lecture given on 30 April 1959
 How to run a HAS Co-audit. Technology and administration.
-Quote:
+:"All right. Now, this is really the total technology involved in an HAS Co-audit. I've given you the total technology involved. There isn't any other technology that you need to know. But there is this thing called familiarity. There is this thing called experience."
 "All right. Now, this is really the total technology involved in an HAS Co-audit. I've given you the total technology involved. There isn't any other technology that you need to know. But there is this thing called familiarity. There is this thing called experience."
 A lecture given on 30 April 1959
-Content description by Ron:
+Content description by Ron:<br />
-"When we say electronic, everybody winces. They think we're talking about electronics or electronics people. We're not talking about electronics people. We're talking about the bits and things that go through the air before a person's field of vision when he's got his eyes closed or the zits and zats and zrups that hit the body, the steady pressures that smash down somebody's chest, the-all sorts of odd phenomena that has to do with little electrical shocks that a person gets, the ringing, singing sensations that they get in their ears, pressures they get against their faces, inside their skulls and oddities of masses that they seem to detect. And how they draw a curtain in front of their faces so they can't see their facsimiles and all of that sort of thing. Got the idea? Now, that's what we're talking about."
+:"When we say electronic, everybody winces. They think we're talking about electronics or electronics people. We're not talking about electronics people. We're talking about the bits and things that go through the air before a person's field of vision when he's got his eyes closed or the zits and zats and zrups that hit the body, the steady pressures that smash down somebody's chest, the-all sorts of odd phenomena that has to do with little electrical shocks that a person gets, the ringing, singing sensations that they get in their ears, pressures they get against their faces, inside their skulls and oddities of masses that they seem to detect. And how they draw a curtain in front of their faces so they can't see their facsimiles and all of that sort of thing. Got the idea? Now, that's what we're talking about."
-Quotes:
+:"You start having a fellow mock up masses and push them into the body, mock up masses and push them into the body, then hold them in, you know, and keep them mocked up, mock up masses and push them into the body-just watch your E-Meter. Your E-Meter needle will start doing things. Well, it just has to do with the density and resistance of this particular mass - electronic phenomena. More important to you is the behavior of the pc under the influence of these things."
-"Now, basically, what are we talking about when we're talking about a mental image picture? At first, it is in the terms of an electronic mass of some sort. That's usually in those terms. It's made out of some sort of standing waves or electrical energy or projection. There's a lot of electronic phenomena connected with just seeing a mental image picture."
-"You start having a fellow mock up masses and push them into the body, mock up masses and push them into the body, then hold them in, you know, and keep them mocked up, mock up masses and push them into the body-just watch your E-Meter. Your E-Meter needle will start doing things. Well, it just has to do with the density and resistance of this particular mass - electronic phenomena.
+==SHPA-26 - 5905C01==
-More important to you is the behavior of the pc under the influence of these things."
 A lecture given on 1 May 1959
-That's a bit about philosophy.
+Here is a bit about philosophy.
-Quotes:
+:"But let me point out something to you. If anything can have an effect upon you, you certainly can take causepoint toward it. Anything can have an effect upon you, you certainly can take cause-point in its direction. Well, that's for sure. That's for sure. And if there is knowledge that is totally above your power to learn, then it will never exist for you or for anybody you know, so skip it."
 "But let me point out something to you. If anything can have an effect upon you, you certainly can take causepoint toward it.
 Anything can have an effect upon you, you certainly can take cause-point in its direction.
 Well, that's for sure. That's for sure. And if there is knowledge that is totally above your power to learn, then it will never exist for you or for anybody you know, so skip it."
-"An individual auditor or a Scientology organization today exists in a society which has an economic and social set of bar of barriers which are very difficult to violate. An auditor would love to just go on auditing people and group auditing people and forget about the money and all that sort of thing. Next thing you know, why, he's disobeyed the communication channels of the society and he isn't auditing anybody. He's having great difficulties.
+:"An individual auditor or a Scientology organization today exists in a society which has an economic and social set of bar of barriers which are very difficult to violate. An auditor would love to just go on auditing people and group auditing people and forget about the money and all that sort of thing. Next thing you know, why, he's disobeyed the communication channels of the society and he isn't auditing anybody. He's having great difficulties. We have environmental impositions and that sort of thing and they tend to keep the information penned up to some degree. But as we break these things down, as the information flows more broadly and it flows better, it's more intelligible, it's more effective, we find ourselves in the favored position of never having imposed a great secrecy of any kind on this particular body of knowledge."
 We have environmental impositions and that sort of thing and they tend to keep the information penned up to some degree. But as we break these things down, as the information flows more broadly and it flows better, it's more intelligible, it's more effective, we find ourselves in the favored position of never having imposed a great secrecy of any kind on this particular body of knowledge."
-"Now a MEST Clear - a MEST Clear can be made and with additional processing and so on, can be stabilized and kept stable - many MEST Clears. This has been terrifically successful, but was not more than a recovery
+:"Now a MEST Clear - a MEST Clear can be made and with additional processing and so on, can be stabilized and kept stable - many MEST Clears. This has been terrifically successful, but was not more than a recovery point. 1957, December was the recovery point for 1947 and 1950. That was-it was no more than that. We had found rapid ways to make what had been made - rapid ways to make what had been made. We hadn't struck out for anything like Theta Clear. Well, now we're in the business of making Theta Clears. Now we're in a superior zone right now to all the succeeding years. And this, I assure you, is really the first time we have been cleanly, clearly and almost totally in a senior zone to all of the earlier periods. That's why this course was made. But what goes out from here-who knows!"
 point. 1957, December was the recovery point for 1947 and 1950. That was-it was no more than that. We had found rapid ways to make what had been made - rapid ways to make what had been made. We hadn't struck out for anything like Theta Clear. Well, now we're in the business of making Theta Clears. Now we're in a superior zone right now to all the succeeding years. And this, I assure you, is really the first time we have been cleanly, clearly and almost totally in a senior zone to all of the earlier periods. That's why this course was made. But what goes out from here-who knows!"
 End of lecture series

@@ Line 414: / Line 414: @@
-SHPA-21 - 5904C28
+==SHPA-21 - 5904C28==
-(PROCESSES)
 A lecture given on 28 April 1959
-Content:
+Content: <br />
 This is about the preclear, his attitudes, etc.
-"Now, an individual who is at pan-determinism would see clearly where he was at cause and where he was at effect. He would see this very clearly. But as we go on down the line, we find there's only one point of the cause-distance-effect line, only one point of it that has to be stressed, and that's cause. The pc must be placed at cause because that's one place he won't go. He'll go to effect."
+:"And this is the basic lie that gets him into trouble. That is the lie that gets him into trouble right across the boards. He wasn't willing to have it happen so he says he had no part in it. And the only answer to that is he must be the effect of all of it - if he couldn't have caused any of it. Well, he was part of it, wasn't he? Well, that's obvious. He's demonstrating it with a broken leg and the little child is demonstrating it with a child's body and the psycho is demonstrating it by being in a spinbin. And this is demonstrated conclusively that he's part of this. But if he says, "Under no circumstances was I causative in this," he is saying, "I'm not willing to have had any of this occur", he then only leaves one door open, and that's effect. Because it's a two-pole universe. If you're not cause you're an effect. That's it. It's as simple as that."
-"Now, as you look this over in an auditing session, the more the pc is obsessively being an effect and the less willing he is to be cause, the more difficult his case will be. Now, that is how you assess a difficult case. That is how you assess one. You find out - one of the first things that you want to know is what's this individual willing to cause? What is he willing to have had,
+:"Now, an individual who is at pan-determinism would see clearly where he was at cause and where he was at effect. He would see this very clearly. But as we go on down the line, we find there's only one point of the cause-distance-effect line, only one point of it that has to be stressed, and that's cause. The pc must be placed at cause because that's one place he won't go. He'll go to effect."
-you see, and cause? What causative point was he willing to occupy?"
-"... it's not propaganda; it's not an argument. It's true! The fellow who will not be processed is nuts! That's it! It's your best diagnosis."
+:"Now, as you look this over in an auditing session, the more the pc is obsessively being an effect and the less willing he is to be cause, the more difficult his case will be. Now, that is how you assess a difficult case. That is how you assess one. You find out - one of the first things that you want to know is what's this individual willing to cause? What is he willing to have had, you see, and cause? What causative point was he willing to occupy?"
-"Improve the pc's causativeness. Improve the pc's responsibility, Improve, and do not violate, the pc's willingness, with improvements in his communication, and you've got auditing!"
+:"... it's not propaganda; it's not an argument. It's true! The fellow who will not be processed is nuts! That's it! It's your best diagnosis."
-"When a person can be brought into communication, a person can be brought into confrontingness. When he's brought into confrontingness he can be brought into causation, responsibility, willingness, he'll change and numerous other listed - already covered - things will occur in the case."
+:"Improve the pc's causativeness. Improve the pc's responsibility, Improve, and do not violate, the pc's willingness, with improvements in his communication, and you've got auditing!"
-"The process is the method by which you achieve the goals of improving the causation, the responsibility, the willingness and of course the affinity and reality of the preclear."
+:"When a person can be brought into communication, a person can be brought into confrontingness. When he's brought into confrontingness he can be brought into causation, responsibility, willingness, he'll change and numerous other listed - already covered - things will occur in the case."
 A lecture given on 29 April 1959
-Content:
+Content:<br />
-Group Auditing
+Group Auditing<br />
-Confront scale
+Confront scale<br />
 Advertising
-	SHPA-23 - 5904C29
+==SHPA-23 - 5904C29==
-(PROCESSING OF CHILDREN)
 A lecture given on 29 April 1959
-Quotes:
+:"A child is much worse off - not because I have anything on children, just cold experience - a child is much worse off than most adults. A little kid running around, you think he's happy, so on? Ah - ah, let's look at him, let's look at him. Yeah, he's got every chance in the world. He has hope. He's got the future. He has the hopes of growing up. That's what's keeping him going. But let's look at him actually. How many hours of sleep does he need? How often does he have to eat in order to keep going? What is his commonest response of protest? There's a nice index of Tone Scale, isn't it? He cries. Well, a lot of children are too far down scale to cry. A child that cries easily is in pretty good shape."
 "A child is much worse off - not because I have anything on children, just cold experience - a child is much worse off than most adults. A little kid running around, you think he's happy, so on? Ah - ah, let's look at him, let's look at him. Yeah, he's got every chance in the world. He has hope. He's got the future. He has the hopes of growing up. That's what's keeping him going.
 But let's look at him actually. How many hours of sleep does he need? How often does he have to eat in order to keep going? What is his commonest response of protest?
 There's a nice index of Tone Scale, isn't it? He cries. Well, a lot of children are too far down scale to cry. A child that cries easily is in pretty good shape."
-"Now, just look at him as a case, not as a child. Then you have the secret of child processing. Don't keep saying, "Well, he's a little child so. . ." so on and so on and so on and follow out the social dramatization of "All is excused, because children are children and boys will be boys and platitudes will be platitudes," and on and on and on, see?
+:"Now, just look at him as a case, not as a child. Then you have the secret of child processing. Don't keep saying, "Well, he's a little child so. . ." so on and so on and so on and follow out the social dramatization of "All is excused, because children are children and boys will be boys and platitudes will be platitudes," and on and on and on, see? These are all just not-isnesses of observation.""
 These are all just not-isnesses of observation.""
-"What processes do you run on a child? The maxim, the golden rule of auditing is: Find something the pc can do, and get him to do it better."
+:"What processes do you run on a child? The maxim, the golden rule of auditing is: Find something the pc can do, and get him to do it better."
-"Now, if we - if we try to categorize children as a special case, and say "Well, children are a special case and you have to be a terrific expert," we would be playing you false. This is not true. The main message on it is children are preclears."
+:"Now, if we - if we try to categorize children as a special case, and say "Well, children are a special case and you have to be a terrific expert," we would be playing you false. This is not true. The main message on it is children are preclears."
@@ Line 482: / Line 481: @@
 Content description by Ron:
-"When we say electronic, everybody winces. They think we're talking about electronics or electronics people.
+"When we say electronic, everybody winces. They think we're talking about electronics or electronics people. We're not talking about electronics people. We're talking about the bits and things that go through the air before a person's field of vision when he's got his eyes closed or the zits and zats and zrups that hit the body, the steady pressures that smash down somebody's chest, the-all sorts of odd phenomena that has to do with little electrical shocks that a person gets, the ringing, singing sensations that they get in their ears, pressures they get against their faces, inside their skulls and oddities of masses that they seem to detect. And how they draw a curtain in front of their faces so they can't see their facsimiles and all of that sort of thing. Got the idea? Now, that's what we're talking about."
 We're not talking about electronics people. We're talking about the bits and things that go through the air before a person's field of vision when he's got his eyes closed or the zits and zats and zrups that hit the body, the steady pressures that smash down somebody's chest, the-all sorts of odd phenomena that has to
 do with little electrical shocks that a person gets, the ringing, singing sensations that they get in their ears, pressures they get against their faces, inside their skulls and oddities of masses that they seem to detect.
 And how they draw a curtain in front of their faces so they can't see their facsimiles and all of that sort of thing. Got the idea? Now, that's what we're talking about."
 Quotes:

@@ Line 353: / Line 353: @@
 Tricks and remedies to that.<br />
 The PT factor, what is PT (present time) to the preclear?
 :"All right. Now, if you understand something of this mechanism - that a person does have a series of experiences plotted against time, he has lived them, he has lived through them and those are his, and they will always be his, but that he does peculiar and odd things about them to make them vanish - such a mechanism of saying they never existed, such a mechanism of being somebody else who didn't have that time track, you see. Such a mechanism of saying, 'Well, past lives don't exist.' It's just another mechanism of disowning a time track. And you get - you get these complex views. But this must never disturb your definition of a time track because the time track we're defining has not ceased to exist! Quite interesting, but that time track has not ceased to exist just because he's taking up other mechanisms to defeat it. He's still got this time track. It's still there. I'm afraid he never wins in getting rid of one. And the only way basically they can ever get clear of a time track, is to confront it and experience it. If he's unwilling to confront it and experience it, all other mechanisms are not-is mechanisms. He's trying to not-is this track, and he has all sorts of weird ways of doing it - and they are the ways of the Reality Scale, of course."

@@ Line 310: / Line 310: @@
 certain practices.
-:"Types of cases then boil down to just this: is the degree of reality the individual is capable of attaining. That's about all you can say about a case - just to be a blunt package statement - to give reality he's capable of attaining. Individual who is terrifically high on the scale is very frightening to have around for an entirely different reason. That's up in the middle ranges. His self-determinism permits him to create for himself almost any kind of an atmosphere or reality he cares to have. You know? He says, "Well, I feel gloomy today," and he feels gloomy. That's it. Or he says, "Well, isn't it a lovely day and I feel happy." It's a lovely day and he's happy. It's as - almost as simple as that, you see. He creates his own environment, you might say. He might have contests against the creation of his own environment and so forth, but he's always making it one way or the other."
+:"Types of cases then boil down to just this: is the degree of reality the individual is capable of attaining. That's about all you can say about a case - just to be a blunt package statement - to give reality he's capable of attaining. Individual who is terrifically high on the scale is very frightening to have around for an entirely different reason. That's up in the middle ranges. His self-determinism permits him to create for himself almost any kind of an atmosphere or reality he cares to have. You know? He says, "Well, I feel gloomy today," and he feels gloomy. That's it. Or he says, "Well, isn't it a lovely day and I feel happy." It's a lovely day and he's happy. It's as - almost as simple as that, you see. He creates his own environment, you might say. He might have contests against the creation of his own environment and so forth, but he's always making it one way or the other."<br />
-"And it's very weird that people in general are so reverted or obverted or something of the sort that they fear wrong way to. They think the quiet person who doesn't give any trouble, he's the nice one to have around. Yet he's the one who always sets the house on fire - if we've got to have people always setting houses on fire. And they say the person at the top of the scale who's just dreaming it all up in all directions and so on, he's really dangerous to have around. Well, this is not true. It's an exact reverse look."
+:"And it's very weird that people in general are so reverted or obverted or something of the sort that they fear wrong way to. They think the quiet person who doesn't give any trouble, he's the nice one to have around. Yet he's the one who always sets the house on fire - if we've got to have people always setting houses on fire. And they say the person at the top of the scale who's just dreaming it all up in all directions and so on, he's really dangerous to have around. Well, this is not true. It's an exact reverse look."
 :"As far as case types are concerned, there is just one case type. And that is a thetan going down scale into a gradient scale of advanced difficulties with affinity, reality and communication. And out of this gradient scale we get an apparency of many case types. But when we add particular engrams making people in particular ways, then we get an enormous new number of case - apparent case types. And then it flies out the window if we don't know anything about it at all. There's apparently one case type per person and we - that's it."

@@ Line 307: / Line 307: @@
 A lecture given on 22 April 1959
-Here we get deeper insight into how various other practices tried to resolve the matter of e.g. insanity. It is with the application of shock which pushes a patient even lower on the ARC scale than the point of his insanity, namely below sensation. Without sensing anything he appears to be more mentally healthy. That's an appearance only. If one can follows the deep logic Ron applies here, one gets a good hold on why he talked so bad about
+Here we get deeper insight into how various other practices tried to resolve the matter of e.g. insanity. It is with the application of shock which pushes a patient even lower on the ARC scale than the point of his insanity, namely below sensation. Without sensing anything he appears to be more mentally healthy. That's an appearance only. If one can follows the deep logic Ron applies here, one gets a good hold on why he talked so negatively about
 certain practices.
@@ Line 316: / Line 316: @@
 :"This is something to remember when you're looking at somebody. Affinity, reality, communication - these factors established will give you entrance to the case, will let you classify the case, will let you predict the case and let you straighten it out. Unless you yourself are too greatly at war with his reality to recognize that that is his reality, you will succeed every time with such cases and they won't fool you and run up a bunch of failures on you."
 ==SHPA-17 - 5904C22==

@@ Line 265: / Line 265: @@
 ==SHPA-14 - 5904C21==
-=== Types of Auditing ===
+===Types of Auditing ===
 A lecture given on 21 April 1959
-Joke at begin:<br />
+Joke to begin:<br />
-:"At first we have to begin with an historical note. Take a gourd rattle. Take some pepper. You throw the pepper into the patient's eyes and nose and then shake the gourd rattle like mad in one ear while screaming shrilly in the other ear. Got that? Having induced an adequate state of shock, you then say, "You are well. You are well. You are well." You see? And that's possibly
+:"At first we have to begin with an historical note. Take a gourd rattle. Take some pepper. You throw the pepper into the patient's eyes and nose and then shake the gourd rattle like mad in one ear while screaming shrilly in the other ear. Got that? Having induced an adequate state of shock, you then say, "You are well. You are well. You are well." You see? And that's possibly the ... one of the early, if not the earliest forerunner of auditing."
 the ... one of the early, if not the earliest forerunner of auditing."
 Content: <br />
@@ Line 284: / Line 283: @@
 :"And if you want to know what a totally black operation would be, it'd - just run a negative Auditor's Code on every clause in it and you've got it. It'd make about the blackest operation you ever heard of. But nobody would do that unless he was in total despair."
-	SHPA-15 - 5904C21
+==SHPA-15 - 5904C21==
-(MODERN AUDITING TYPES)
 A lecture given on 21 April 1959
-Content:
+Content:<br />
-The second lecture on auditing types now deals not with the history of counselling, but rather with the contemporary styles pertaining to Dianetics and Scientology.
+The second lecture on auditing types now deals not with the history of counselling, but rather with the contemporary styles pertaining to Dianetics and Scientology.<br />
-The bad ones like "book auditing" (Note: not to be misunderstood as Book 1 auditing ), "coffee-shop auditing".
+The bad ones like "book auditing" (Note: not to be misunderstood as Book 1 auditing ), "coffee-shop auditing".<br />
-The informal ones like e.g. assists.
+The informal ones like e.g. assists. <br />
-Muzzled Auditing
+Muzzled Auditing<br />
-Intentional auditing.
+Intentional auditing.<br />
 Formal auditing.
@@ Line 300: / Line 301: @@
 This tape, and a couple of others, give one a good notion about what professional auditing should look like.
-	SHPA-16 - 5904C22
+==SHPA-16 - 5904C22==
-(TYPES OF CASES)
 A lecture given on 22 April 1959
- Here we get deeper insight into how various other practices tried to resolve the matter of e.g. insanity. It is with the application of shock which pushes a patient even lower on the ARC scale than the point of his insanity, namely below sensation. Without sensing anything he appears to be more mentally healthy. That's an appearance only. If one can follows the deep logic Ron applies here, one gets a good hold on why he talked so bad about
+Here we get deeper insight into how various other practices tried to resolve the matter of e.g. insanity. It is with the application of shock which pushes a patient even lower on the ARC scale than the point of his insanity, namely below sensation. Without sensing anything he appears to be more mentally healthy. That's an appearance only. If one can follows the deep logic Ron applies here, one gets a good hold on why he talked so bad about
 certain practices.
-"Types of cases then boil down to just this: is the degree of reality the individual is capable of attaining. That's about all you can say about a case - just to be a blunt package statement - to give reality he's capable of attaining.
+:"Types of cases then boil down to just this: is the degree of reality the individual is capable of attaining. That's about all you can say about a case - just to be a blunt package statement - to give reality he's capable of attaining. Individual who is terrifically high on the scale is very frightening to have around for an entirely different reason. That's up in the middle ranges. His self-determinism permits him to create for himself almost any kind of an atmosphere or reality he cares to have. You know? He says, "Well, I feel gloomy today," and he feels gloomy. That's it. Or he says, "Well, isn't it a lovely day and I feel happy." It's a lovely day and he's happy. It's as - almost as simple as that, you see. He creates his own environment, you might say. He might have contests against the creation of his own environment and so forth, but he's always making it one way or the other."
 Individual who is terrifically high on the scale is very frightening to have around for an entirely different reason. That's up in the middle ranges. His self-determinism permits him to create for himself almost any kind of an atmosphere or reality he cares to have.
 You know? He says, "Well, I feel gloomy today," and he feels gloomy. That's it. Or he says, "Well, isn't it a lovely day and I feel happy." It's a lovely day and he's happy. It's as - almost as simple as that, you see. He creates his own environment, you might say. He might have contests against the creation of his own environment and so forth, but he's always making it one way or the other."
 "And it's very weird that people in general are so reverted or obverted or something of the sort that they fear wrong way to. They think the quiet person who doesn't give any trouble, he's the nice one to have around. Yet he's the one who always sets the house on fire - if we've got to have people always setting houses on fire. And they say the person at the top of the scale who's just dreaming it all up in all directions and so on, he's really dangerous to have around. Well, this is not true. It's an exact reverse look."
-"As far as case types are concerned, there is just one case type. And that is a thetan going down scale into a gradient scale of advanced difficulties with affinity, reality and communication. And out of this gradient scale we get an apparency of many case types. But when we add particular engrams making people in particular ways, then we get an enormous new number of case - apparent case types. And then it flies out the window if we don't know
+:"As far as case types are concerned, there is just one case type. And that is a thetan going down scale into a gradient scale of advanced difficulties with affinity, reality and communication. And out of this gradient scale we get an apparency of many case types. But when we add particular engrams making people in particular ways, then we get an enormous new number of case - apparent case types. And then it flies out the window if we don't know anything about it at all. There's apparently one case type per person and we - that's it."
 anything about it at all. There's apparently one case type per person and we - that's it."
-"This is something to remember when you're looking at somebody. Affinity, reality, communication - these factors established will give you entrance to the case, will let you classify the case, will let you predict the case and let you straighten it out. Unless you yourself are too greatly at war with his reality to recognize that that is his reality, you will succeed every time with such cases and they won't fool you and run up a bunch of failures on you."
+==SHPA-17 - 5904C22==
 A lecture given on 22 April 1959
@@ Line 325: / Line 327: @@
 [ASSESSMENT, an inventory and evaluation of a preclear, his body and his case to establish processing level and procedure. (HCOB 3 Jul 59, General Information )]
-"To acquire the trick of being able to observe a reality that is not your reality and merely observe it as that reality and then take the proper amount of responsibility to adjust it, is a very interesting discipline, and one that a lot of auditors fall from grace on."
+:"To acquire the trick of being able to observe a reality that is not your reality and merely observe it as that reality and then take the proper amount of responsibility to adjust it, is a very interesting discipline, and one that a lot of auditors fall from grace on."
-"Now, the common auditor error - the common auditor error is to repress change because of incredulity. And it's just these first two laws that I gave you there.
+:"Now, the common auditor error - the common auditor error is to repress change because of incredulity. And it's just these first two laws that I gave you there.<br />
-One: You've got to look at the person's reality, observe it, see it for what it is. That is his reality, you see.
+One: You've got to look at the person's reality, observe it, see it for what it is. That is his reality, you see.<br />
 And then, Two: Take enough responsibility for it to change it up to a better confronted reality, You see? Those are the two things you're supposed to do. So anything else that is introduced over on the top of this simply defeats the whole purpose of auditing - as neat as you please"
-"Now, when you assess a case you're looking for the other-determinisms which, if relieved, will permit self-determinism to occur. Definition, technical. When you're assessing a case you're looking for other-determinism which, if relieved, will permit self-determinism. Do you see this?"
+:"Now, when you assess a case you're looking for the other-determinisms which, if relieved, will permit self-determinism to occur. Definition, technical. When you're assessing a case you're looking for other-determinism which, if relieved, will permit self-determinism. Do you see this?"
-"Well, what about this. Assessment. We're looking, basically, for bad cause, which means cause calculated to undermine the self-determinism, independence, good health and continued survival of the pc. That's what we're looking for. We're looking for bad cause."
+:"Well, what about this. Assessment. We're looking, basically, for bad cause, which means cause calculated to undermine the self-determinism, independence, good health and continued survival of the pc. That's what we're looking for. We're looking for bad cause."
-"Now, you can understand a lot about cases, understand a tremendous amount about cases, if you understand that the mechanism of self-invalidation is mixed up with every computation.
+:"Now, you can understand a lot about cases, understand a tremendous amount about cases, if you understand that the mechanism of self-invalidation is mixed up with every computation.
 Because the bad cause valence which is dominant on the case is seeking to make nothing out of the individual - the thetan, you see. But the thetan is actually fighting for some type of determinism or control over a bad cause factor. And you've got a fight consisting of at least two terminals, one synthetic and one live - the thetan's alive, the other's synthetic. It's being created by the thetan, yet he doesn't know why he's creating it."
-"What is, basically, the reactive bank? The reactive bank is the other-determinism which has overwhelmed the preclear. That's all the reactive bank is. That's a very fast statement but a very accurate one."
+:"What is, basically, the reactive bank? The reactive bank is the other-determinism which has overwhelmed the preclear. That's all the reactive bank is. That's a very fast statement but a very accurate one."
 	SHPA-18 - 5904C23