Two Happiness Rundowns - Revision history

AntPhillips: type to/at

2019-04-25T09:07:44Z

type to/at

AntPhillips: /* by Antony Phillips */ added links to Dane Tops letter

2018-04-26T17:24:33Z

‎by Antony Phillips: added links to Dane Tops letter

AntPhillips: /* References */ new link

2016-08-10T19:21:32Z

‎References: new link

AntPhillips: /* References */ temp change to dropbox file

2016-07-31T16:55:37Z

‎References: temp change to dropbox file

AntPhillips: /* References */ change reference for The Way to Happiness

2016-07-10T14:42:03Z

‎References: change reference for The Way to Happiness

AntPhillips: /* Experiences with the Happiness Rundown */ deleted one empty line

2016-07-07T11:12:19Z

‎Experiences with the Happiness Rundown: deleted one empty line

AntPhillips: /* By Max Hauri */ addition (response to questions)

2016-07-07T11:09:39Z

‎By Max Hauri: addition (response to questions)

AntPhillips: /* References */add Internet references

2016-07-07T07:43:38Z

‎References: add Internet references

AntPhillips: /* References */filled in references

2016-07-04T08:49:02Z

‎References: filled in references

AntPhillips: /* Happiness Rundown Series #7 *typographical-8not7 and link, badly formatted, to the Bulletin

2016-07-03T16:26:27Z

/* Happiness Rundown Series #7 *typographical-8not7 and link, badly formatted, to the Bulletin

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 :''On 8 January 2016 Kenneth G. Urquhart wrote the following comment on Max Hauri's entry (see further down) [[User:AntPhillips|Antony A Phillips]] ([[User talk:AntPhillips|talk]]) 03:13, January 14, 2016 (CST)''
-In my day, LRH would develop a new rundown using the auditors to hand
+In my day, LRH would develop a new rundown using the auditors at hand
 locally to begin the experimental auditing.He would work with the c/s who
 was in charge of the auditors but LRH would usually see the folders too.

@@ Line 284: / Line 284: @@
 It is now 30 years or so since I audited Happiness Rundown and memories are dim! A few still stand out. Usually when running it some precepts took more time than others. One person I audited after I came out of the Church had trouble with the one "Honour and Help Your Parents." He regarded his father as suppressive, and told me a good deal about his father. At the time, which was fairly near to when I was thrown out of the Church, I felt that the way I handled it I thought would not have been accepted by the Church. Now, looking at it from a new viewpoint, I could have wished that I had the support of a good C/S and possibly Cramming Officer. I have since, auditing other routines, come across two or three preclears whose fathers could have been regarded as pretty suppressive (should one honour them and what, actually, does honour mean?). Another preclear I remember well was an auditor on org staff and had had problems of some sort in one org which did not get handled despite a good deal of auditing and in the end he moved to another org to handle it (I don't remember the problem now). On one precept he discovered a solution to it, or what the nature of the problem was, and was elated! After I was thrown out of the church I had one preclear on Happiness Rundown who did the whole in two sessions and most or all of the precepts had no charge on them. Again, looking back, I wondered if a C/S, cramming officer, or just a chat with a friendly, knowledgeable fellow auditor, would have revealed a way of handling which I had missed, so I'm left now with the conclusion that actually there wasn't anything to be handled, that his integrity was very thoroughly in, or that he had some sort of hidden agenda of proving how perfect he was! I must have been on the Happiness Rundown when it was still being changed in small ways. There is one step done on most precepts where you look for an identity and then run a process on it. We were told not to do it if the identity was the preclear (possibly in an earlier life). At one point my preclear, the Class VIII auditor, came up with the identity of a little dog and we ran that. Later, when we were allowed to run identities, he told me that actually that was his own identity. When we became able to run the preclear's own identity, we ran it with a special process with a special endpoint (actually four possible endpoints). Own identity was rather rare but I came up with four own identities all being "famous people" and one of them running for about 10 hours (four sessions, when we were expected to not to end session before completing a precept!).
-There was one rather sad incident. Before I started the Happiness Rundown, in the lunch hour, I met walking across the courtyard of the AOSH a man who looked rather unhappy and said he had come to get a DofP interview. There were no staff around who could do it, and I think he had an appointment or work to get back to, so I did it myself. I thought no more about it until there came a point when I and others had to choose someone to audit on the Happiness Rundown. I wanted the man who I had twinned with on the Briefing Course (a Swede). The Happiness Rundown C/S refused about five other requests for someone to audit, until this man who I had given a DofP interview to was audited. It turned out that he had been getting auditing by a HRD student who had abandoned him (very out integrity) when he had completed his Happiness Rundown course/internship. Once you start the Happiness Rundown you should complete it. I took this abandoned preclear, my first action was to run the Happiness Rundown Repair List on him and this read on the item "rundown incomplete", so I just went on where the other auditor had left off.<ref>''' Antony's life shortly after the HRD - leading to being thrown out! ''' At the time I finished the HRD Course and Internship I had run out of money, so to speak. I was trying to make a rather futile effort to set up a business under WISE, advising people on how to run their businesses on LRH lines and policy. I was contacting managing directors, and trying to sell this idea to them. I had enough money left on my account at the AOSH to get a Sec Check which would be a necessary action before my next NOTs session. After the session I was kept waiting an hour for a DofP interview, complained about it, and, rather to my surprise, instead of what I expected, to be sent in for an a ARC break session from my auditor, I was sent to Qual, who sent me to HCO with instructions that I should write up my overts and withholds. After two or three days of coming back to HCO (AOSH) with a new attempt and list of overts and withholds, the HCO Executive Secretary came up behind me as I was approaching the Ethics Officer's desk, told me that this was not okay, as they were not being paid for it, and sent me to EULO (European Liaison Office, which was the headquarters of Scientology in Europe) where I was put on something which they called the Deck Project Force. The Deck Project Force was really intended for staff members and I was not a staff member. Also I did it part-time and the others were doing it full-time. I was doing a badly paid night job and trying to get customers for my consulting business! The Deck Project Force consisted of two things, writing up your overts and withholds with occasional "Gang Sec. Checks" (two or more people behind the auditor and the meter also interrogating you) , and doing physical work. I did this for some days, until one day I arrived there, sat down to write up my overts and withholds (again!), and the Course Supervisor came over to me and asked me to set a target of the how many lines or pages of overts and withholds I was going to write. I was somewhat nonplussed by this, and while I was pondering how on earth I could assess that, he sent me to the Master of Arms, which was a posh Sea Org name for Ethics Officer. She told me that I was a Suppressive Person (which I believed!) and that I was to go away and find my overt and I was not to speak to anyone until I had come in and told her! I found myself a better paid job but lived in a sort of limbo until on June 15, 1983, when I received the Dane Tops letter and got in communication with some Scientologists who had been surprised that I had been thrown out of the Church and were dissatisfied with the Church! Was I a marked man, because of taking the HRD? I was treated markedly differently from much of my earlier Scientology career. '''Antony Phillips December 2015.''' </ref>.
+There was one rather sad incident. Before I started the Happiness Rundown, in the lunch hour, I met walking across the courtyard of the AOSH a man who looked rather unhappy and said he had come to get a DofP interview. There were no staff around who could do it, and I think he had an appointment or work to get back to, so I did it myself. I thought no more about it until there came a point when I and others had to choose someone to audit on the Happiness Rundown. I wanted the man who I had twinned with on the Briefing Course (a Swede). The Happiness Rundown C/S refused about five other requests for someone to audit, until this man who I had given a DofP interview to was audited. It turned out that he had been getting auditing by a HRD student who had abandoned him (very out integrity) when he had completed his Happiness Rundown course/internship. Once you start the Happiness Rundown you should complete it. I took this abandoned preclear, my first action was to run the Happiness Rundown Repair List on him and this read on the item "rundown incomplete", so I just went on where the other auditor had left off.<ref>''' Antony's life shortly after the HRD - leading to being thrown out! ''' At the time I finished the HRD Course and Internship I had run out of money, so to speak. I was trying to make a rather futile effort to set up a business under WISE, advising people on how to run their businesses on LRH lines and policy. I was contacting managing directors, and trying to sell this idea to them. I had enough money left on my account at the AOSH to get a Sec Check which would be a necessary action before my next NOTs session. After the session I was kept waiting an hour for a DofP interview, complained about it, and, rather to my surprise, instead of what I expected, to be sent in for an a ARC break session from my auditor, I was sent to Qual, who sent me to HCO with instructions that I should write up my overts and withholds. After two or three days of coming back to HCO (AOSH) with a new attempt and list of overts and withholds, the HCO Executive Secretary came up behind me as I was approaching the Ethics Officer's desk, told me that this was not okay, as they were not being paid for it, and sent me to EULO (European Liaison Office, which was the headquarters of Scientology in Europe) where I was put on something which they called the Deck Project Force. The Deck Project Force was really intended for staff members and I was not a staff member. Also I did it part-time and the others were doing it full-time. I was doing a badly paid night job and trying to get customers for my consulting business! The Deck Project Force consisted of two things, writing up your overts and withholds with occasional "Gang Sec. Checks" (two or more people behind the auditor and the meter also interrogating you) , and doing physical work. I did this for some days, until one day I arrived there, sat down to write up my overts and withholds (again!), and the Course Supervisor came over to me and asked me to set a target of the how many lines or pages of overts and withholds I was going to write. I was somewhat nonplussed by this, and while I was pondering how on earth I could assess that, he sent me to the Master of Arms, which was a posh Sea Org name for Ethics Officer. She told me that I was a Suppressive Person (which I believed!) and that I was to go away and find my overt and I was not to speak to anyone until I had come in and told her! I found myself a better paid job but lived in a sort of limbo until on June 15, 1983, when I received the Dane Tops letter[http://scientolipedia.org/info/Dane_Tops_Letter_Comes_to_Denmark] and got in communication with some Scientologists who had been surprised that I had been thrown out of the Church and were dissatisfied with the Church! Was I a marked man, because of taking the HRD? I was treated markedly differently from much of my earlier Scientology career. '''Antony Phillips December 2015.''' </ref>.
 ''I hope this account encourages others to write their experience because my account is not (normal/usual)''

@@ Line 338: / Line 338: @@
 == References ==
-'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text with introduction outlining what has been missed, extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/knr2jssq2awh35n/The%20Way%20to%20Happiness%20for%20Scientolipedia%28b%29.pdf?dl=0]]<br />
+'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text with introduction outlining what has been missed, extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/8uhwtl0ivrdme5n/The%20Way%20to%20Happiness%20for%20Scientolipedia-z.pdf?dl=0]]<br />
 '''First Happiness Rundown course checksheet''' including written material (not books or transcripts): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/4/48/HCOPL_2_Mar_81_Hubbard_Happiness_Rundown_Auditor%27s_Course.pdf]]<br />
 '''Happiness Rundown Series #8 '''(The 90 page bulletin with some case histories, not repeated in the later Happiness Rundown, extracted from the above scanned in course check sheet): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/0/06/Happiness_Rundown_Additives_%28cancellation%29.pdf]]<br />

@@ Line 338: / Line 338: @@
 == References ==
-'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text with introduction outlining what has been missed, extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/6/6c/The_Way_to_Happiness_for_Scientolipedia.pdf]]<br />
+'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text with introduction outlining what has been missed, extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[https://www.dropbox.com/s/knr2jssq2awh35n/The%20Way%20to%20Happiness%20for%20Scientolipedia%28b%29.pdf?dl=0]]<br />
 '''First Happiness Rundown course checksheet''' including written material (not books or transcripts): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/4/48/HCOPL_2_Mar_81_Hubbard_Happiness_Rundown_Auditor%27s_Course.pdf]]<br />
 '''Happiness Rundown Series #8 '''(The 90 page bulletin with some case histories, not repeated in the later Happiness Rundown, extracted from the above scanned in course check sheet): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/0/06/Happiness_Rundown_Additives_%28cancellation%29.pdf]]<br />

@@ Line 338: / Line 338: @@
 == References ==
-'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text without the publication data, the little note saying that it is nonreligious or the explanatory footnotes, scanned in with at least one scanning error and extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/7/7a/The_Way_to_Happiness_text_only.pdf]]<br />
+'''Booklet ''' ''The Way to Happiness ''(main text with introduction outlining what has been missed, extracted from the first Happiness Rundown course checksheet below): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/6/6c/The_Way_to_Happiness_for_Scientolipedia.pdf]]<br />
 '''First Happiness Rundown course checksheet''' including written material (not books or transcripts): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/4/48/HCOPL_2_Mar_81_Hubbard_Happiness_Rundown_Auditor%27s_Course.pdf]]<br />
 '''Happiness Rundown Series #8 '''(The 90 page bulletin with some case histories, not repeated in the later Happiness Rundown, extracted from the above scanned in course check sheet): [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/0/06/Happiness_Rundown_Additives_%28cancellation%29.pdf]]<br />

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, July 7, 2016
Line 245:		Line 245:

	Ronsorg (talk)‎18:32, January 6, 2016		Ronsorg (talk)‎18:32, January 6, 2016
−

	: ''[as a result of another person's questions to Max, he answered with the following with permission to put it on Scientolipedia.]''		: ''[as a result of another person's questions to Max, he answered with the following with permission to put it on Scientolipedia.]''

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, July 7, 2016
Line 245:		Line 245:

	Ronsorg (talk)‎18:32, January 6, 2016		Ronsorg (talk)‎18:32, January 6, 2016
		+
		+
		+	: ''[as a result of another person's questions to Max, he answered with the following with permission to put it on Scientolipedia.]''
		+
		+	Being on staff you had to compromise with your integrity all the time and the longer the more. The HRD brought back your integrity to a large degree, so you had to make a choice...
		+
		+	I don't know what happened really in those years, I doubt LRH was really around, and I doubt LRH would have released such a RD in the 50ties. It is too moralistic, it is based on a moral code - I consider it quite correct but still, it is moral. I think it works well on a Christian and Scn based society but will this RD also work on Islam based society? Or in Far East?
		+
		+	For example in Russia we had not the same success with it as I was used to have auditing Scientologists (when I was still staff auditor). Indeed it worked best on those Scientologists then. The huge success of HRD was most probably also based on the fact that HRD was the first real valence handling RD and application, implying that there has been almost no valence handling otherwise.
		+
		+	Valences and its handling is a fantastic subject, and when I returned to the tech 1990 (I left the church end 83) I was studying all the stuff again I realized the power of it, also knowing the subject of HRD, and later also Don Roth gave me good advice, I learnt a lot on it and how to apply it, and it is dynamite. So we introduced this tech, all kind of valence handlings from the ''Red Volumes'' or BC [Saint Hill Special Briefing Course] tapes, and also the LXs.
		+
		+	I certainly blew from staff because I recognized that if I don't leave staff I will have to do things I would be ashamed of myself to the end of my life for having done so. Of course there have been plenty of other reasons, too.
		+
		+	I tried to handle the org from inside, which brought me only into ethics and such matters. It got the longer the more impossible to keep the own integrity. HRD was certainly something that helped me to make a correct decision.
		+
		+	Let's put it this way, HRD opened the eyes of many staffs and Scientologists. They didn't blow because HRD would have been out tech to them but because of all the other out tech, out admin and out ethics.
		+
		+	I still wonder who initiated the RD. I doubt it was LRH and I also don't think he wrote the booklet. Not his style.
		+
		+	Much love Max (7th July 2016)

	=== 1981 Auditor Training and Internship at AOSH EU and AF, Denmark ===		=== 1981 Auditor Training and Internship at AOSH EU and AF, Denmark ===

@@ Line 324: / Line 324: @@
 [[http://scientolipedia.org/w/images/0/06/Happiness_Rundown_Additives_%28cancellation%29.pdf]]<br />
 '''Second Happiness Rundown course checksheet''', including tape lecture transcripts, book on emeter drills, and a FriScientology Tech Dictionary (2012): [[http://www.antology.info/storage/HRD/HRD-Course-1984-2014.pdf]]
 == Footnotes, Etc. ==

@@ Line 150: / Line 150: @@
 The rest of the Happiness Rundown Series bulletins are different in the first and second versions, though the material of Happiness Rundown Series #7 is never repeated. However reading these 1984 versions the data they contain is very close to the data in the first Happiness Rundown so that the difference is that there placed differently.
-== Happiness Rundown Series #7 ==
+== Happiness Rundown Series #8 [[File:HRDseries-8scannedin.pdf]]==
 This bulletin is dated 16 March 81 and is unusual, perhaps unique, in Scientology history. It is 90 pages long and starts by saying "The Happiness Rundown was piloted on over 40 cases." It then gives summaries of each session of 16 of those cases. A perusal of the whole 90 pages is quite revealing, especially to the experienced auditor. As well as giving some of the wins from particular sessions, including the fact that people who did not know the preclear was on Happiness Rundown noticing a change in the preclear's manner. It also gives examples of auditor mistakes in running these pilot sessions.
@@ Line 203: / Line 203: @@
 : The HRD was continued using the “assessment method”, which has been running very well, for some sessions. The HRD has not yet been completed.<br />
 Link to full data: [[Media:Happiness_Rundown_Series_8_(Case_Histories).pdf]]
 == Experiences with the Happiness Rundown ==