<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3AHbeer%2FGlossary%2Freply</id>
		<title>Thread:User talk:Hbeer/Glossary/reply - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3AHbeer%2FGlossary%2Freply"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Hbeer/Glossary/reply&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-13T13:05:52Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.25.3</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Hbeer/Glossary/reply&amp;diff=5822&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Hbeer: Reply to Glossary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Hbeer/Glossary/reply&amp;diff=5822&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-11-26T05:34:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Hbeer/Glossary&quot; title=&quot;Thread:User talk:Hbeer/Glossary&quot;&gt;Glossary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Hi David,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can see your point. However, there are some new definitions coined by Clearbird that I would like to add to the glossary. Are you familiar with his GPM work as documented on http://completeyourbridge.org? He really re-installed &amp;quot;lost tech&amp;quot; there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We would have two definitions and three abbreviations to add: DEEP, DCC (DEEP Character Clearing), DEEP Character Clearing, DIR (DEEP Incident Running), and DEEP Incident Running. These processes include effort processing. According to LRH, 80% of the charge is left in an incident if the efforts aren't flattened. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can you take an hour or two and have a look at the LRH references on http://completeyourbridge.org/References/CYBReferences.htm? They are of essential importance for any auditor. I believe LRH was the tremendous auditor that he was because he used these things in his sessions - losing them from auditor training was understandable in the church context, but I think that the independents should go back to the roots and put them back into use. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the best,&lt;br /&gt;
Heidrun&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Hbeer</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>