https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMeter_Reads_Drill_Film%2FCritique_from_Ralph_HiltonThread:Talk:Meter Reads Drill Film/Critique from Ralph Hilton - Revision history2026-05-09T12:37:16ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.25.3https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Meter_Reads_Drill_Film/Critique_from_Ralph_Hilton&diff=7974&oldid=prevRalph Hilton: New thread: Critique from Ralph Hilton2013-05-04T08:25:17Z<p>New thread: Critique from Ralph Hilton</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Hi Jonathan,<br />
I think the film has quite a way to go to reach release quality.<br />
The long fall is a prior read.<br />
The persistent F/N is very jerky.<br />
The "F/N that springs" doesn't look at all like an F/N.<br />
The theta bop is too slow.<br />
The R/S looks as if it was made by touching the cans together.<br />
The stage four doesn't look anything like the ones I have seen.<br />
The rocket read didn't rocket.<br />
<br />
I would say that the first thing to do is throw out the CofS meter as it shows a lot of artifacts.<br />
Then reads need to be collected from recordings of a lot of real sessions. I'd be quite willing to design and prototype a meter with a digital record and playback. That way the session reads could be played back on a meter setup with optimum lighting for a video recording.</div>Ralph Hilton