https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AJohn_Damonte%2FJohn_Damonte_-_additonal_note.%2Freply_%282%29Thread:Talk:John Damonte/John Damonte - additonal note./reply (2) - Revision history2026-05-09T22:25:05ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.25.3https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:John_Damonte/John_Damonte_-_additonal_note./reply_(2)&diff=12152&oldid=prevAntPhillips: Reply to John Damonte - additonal note.2014-02-20T17:51:14Z<p>Reply to <a href="/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:John_Damonte/John_Damonte_-_additonal_note./reply" title="Thread:Talk:John Damonte/John Damonte - additonal note./reply">John Damonte - additonal note.</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Yes. I believe part of the data series (or something green on white) is that to judge a situation you need "all the facts" (a bit of a tall order, but you do need as much as possible and reasonable of the relevant facts). Another important "green on white" is a necessity to be able to evaluate importances. To move to an entirely different field, there has been a "big fuss" in Denmark and abroad because the Zoo here killed a youngish giraffe. Totally out of proportion. A lack of interest in the facts behind it.</div>AntPhillips