https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ACritique_-_Meter_Reads_and_Drills%2FIgnazio_Tidu%2Freply 2026-06-23T13:17:55Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.25.3 https://upgrade.scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Critique_-_Meter_Reads_and_Drills/Ignazio_Tidu/reply&diff=7728&oldid=prev 2013-04-14T14:55:13Z

<p>Reply to <a href="/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Critique_-_Meter_Reads_and_Drills/Ignazio_Tidu" title="Thread:Talk:Critique - Meter Reads and Drills/Ignazio Tidu">Ignazio Tidu</a></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Jonathan,<br /> <br /> I'm attaching my comments below Ignazio's as he sums it up pretty well in my opinion. This is greatly improved from the first one and I see much change from my original comments made. I have no problem with the FNs as they aren't always &quot;picture perfect&quot; in session; I agree with Pat and Ignazio on the theta bop (can you speed up the frame rate and loop it perhaps?); the tick should be more of a quick &quot;jerk&quot; or &quot;tick&quot; as Glenn and Trey point out; and as Ignazio states, the D/N needs to be more &quot;erratic, ragged, jerky&quot;. Finally, if you could tone down that last sound that heralds the change in dial faces, I think, as Trey says, it would be less jarring. Just a volume thing. Other than that, you've created something that truly shows your &quot;labour of love&quot;. Well done.<br /> <br /> ARC,<br /> Chris</div>

Standardtechauditor