Special HPA Lecture Series - Revision history

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-11 - 5904C15 */ Beth suggestion / qual action

2017-10-16T16:30:22Z

‎SHPA-11 - 5904C15: Beth suggestion / qual action

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-7 - 5904C09 */ Beth Qual suggestions

2017-10-16T15:48:50Z

‎SHPA-7 - 5904C09: Beth Qual suggestions

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-6 - 5904C09 */ Beth call actions entered

2017-10-16T15:40:20Z

‎SHPA-6 - 5904C09: Beth call actions entered

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-5 - 5904C08 */ add Beth call actions

2017-10-16T15:28:03Z

‎SHPA-5 - 5904C08: add Beth call actions

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-4 - 5904C08 */Beth corrections

2017-09-28T16:58:56Z

‎SHPA-4 - 5904C08: Beth corrections

AntPhillips: /* SHPA-3 - 5904C07 */proof read

2017-09-28T16:33:30Z

‎SHPA-3 - 5904C07: proof read

AntPhillips: "Incubate" replaced by a better sentence

2017-09-07T10:54:22Z

"Incubate" replaced by a better sentence

AntPhillips: Correct:Author Rbin (reviewer)

2017-09-06T16:11:24Z

Correct:Author Rbin (reviewer)

AntPhillips: Continuing on a browser which works with Dragon

2017-09-06T16:09:55Z

Continuing on a browser which works with Dragon

AntPhillips: Adding first of Beth's suggestions and corrections

2017-09-06T15:17:33Z

Adding first of Beth's suggestions and corrections

@@ Line 202: / Line 202: @@
 Content:<br />
-:How to get along with a preclear is the way you could say the Auditor's Code reads. But how to get along with the public is the subtitle of the Scientologist's Code. And these are two codes on two different dynamics. It's very important that you should recognize that they have the same basic rationale on both dynamics. This is how to get results on a pc - the Scientologist's Code is actually, to a marked degree, how to get results on the public. It's very fascinating that very few people have ever understood that ethics are basically merely good sense.
+:"How to get along with a preclear" is the way you could say the Auditor's Code reads but how to get along with the public is the subtitle of the Scientologist's Code. And these are two codes on two different dynamics. It's very important that you recognize that they have the same basic rationale on both dynamics. This is how to get results on a pc - the Scientologist's Code is actually, to a marked degree, how to get results on the public. It's very fascinating that very few people have ever understood that ethics are basically merely good sense.
-Moral and ethics.
+Morals and ethics.
 Comment:

@@ Line 155: / Line 155: @@
 Overt-act motivator sequence (the reason for going down the reality scale).<br />
 DED-DEDEX.<br />
-Substitutes.
+Substitutes [Level on the Reality Scale].
 :"... this Reality Scale is the attitudes toward reality and it totally stems from backing away from reality and then making it invisible, you see, and then blacking it out and then having some entirely different reality to stand in its place."

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 Content:
-It gets really interesting when he talks about <br />
+It gets really interesting when he talks aboutː <br />
 a) how and what the meter registers,<br />
-b) the fact that mental mass, energy, space and time is the same as physical universe MEST. And this goes on when it comes to the anatomy of the mind.
+b) the fact that mental mass, energy, space and time is the same as physical universe MEST. And this happens when we examine the anatomy of the mind.
-Postulates, circuits and misownership are added. Ron is in his element and crystal clear. Pieces come together. One gets a glimpse at the big picture. Not that you can as-is the mind afterwards. But perhaps the possibility becomes pleasantly real.
+Postulates, circuits and misownership are added. Ron is in his element and crystal clear. Pieces come together. One gets a glimpse at the big picture –  not that you can as-is the mind afterwards. But perhaps the possibility becomes pleasantly realǃ
 Hypnotism and irresponsibility explained.
-The differences and definitions of lock, dub-in, mock-up, secondary, engram explained.
+The differences and definitions of lock, dub-in, mock-up, secondary and engram explained.
 This is a most interesting datum:<br />

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 Content:
-Ron describes a scale of processing goals. On the lowest stage the body is addressed in terms of healing bodily ailments - like what a physician does. Above that processing is more and more targeting the case of the preclear. This is related to various states of being - e.g. release, MEST-Clear, Theta-Clear, Operating Thetan.
+Ron describes a scale of processing goals. On the lowest stage the body is addressed i.e. the goal is healing bodily ailments - as a physician does. Above that processing is more and more targeting the case of the preclear. This is related to various states of being - e.g. release, MEST-Clear, Theta-Clear, Operating Thetan.
-Further Ron talks about a scale of difficulties to be resolved in processing.
+Further. Ron talks about a scale of difficulties to be resolved in processing.
-The last difficulty to surrender is communication difficulties, followed form, which is next most difficult. Next to that is germs. Constant conditions are even easier to resolve (e.g. with an Locational Process). Chronic difficulties rank amongst the easier targets. Aches and pains are the easiest targets.
+The last difficulty to surrender is communication difficulties, followed by form, which is next most difficult. Next to that is germs. Constant conditions are even easier to resolve (e.g. with an Locational Process). Chronic difficulties rank amongst the easier targets. Aches and pains are the easiest targets.
 :"All right. Nevertheless, that has to be - because it is and because it can be created in a finite number of hours - is the first grade of Clear. This state can be obtained. E-Meters don't work on them until they key themselves back in again with postulates and so forth. And they measure up in various ways. Their intelligence is terrific. Now, these, by the way, are fairly terrific people. They do all right. I'm not downgrading the people who reach this state. I'm just showing you it's not stable."
@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 :"All right. Get the idea of mocking up a picture as large as that wall and as brilliant as present time. You got that idea? Good. Now get the idea it'd spoil the game if you did it, and don't do it."
-The goal of that course:<br />
+The goal of this course:<br />
 :"And the goal of Theta Clear is terrifically valid to go for. And that's what we're going to teach you to do in this course."
-−
 ==SHPA-6 - 5904C09==

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 A lecture given on 8 April 1959
-In regard of the content: The concept of simply "standing ones ground" in order to resolve another's effect is a sensible, realistic alternative a) out-creating an opponent with a bigger effect of one's own creation (and later perhaps suffer from guilt) or b) to put up a complementary postulate to the opponent .
+This consists of the concept of simply "standing one's ground" in order to resolve another's effect. This is a sensible, realistic alternative and can be done by either a) out-creating an opponent with a bigger effect of one's own creation (and later perhaps suffering from guilt) or b) putting up a complementary postulate to the opponent .
-But there is still a much higher concept for resolving a problem or conflict:<br />
+But there is still a much higher concept for resolving a problem or conflict:
-The ability of a being to exert pan-determinism. Something Ron goes in depth in one of the following lectures.
+the ability of a being to exert pan-determinism. Something Ron goes in depth in one of the following lectures.
-:"A wonderful exercise is take the Chart of Human Evaluation out into the society, call on a bank, call on a greengrocer, talk to a policeman, stop a casual pedestrian. Listen to the communication and look at them on the Tone Scale; see about where they are. You won't have to go into very much examination of their past, present and future life to know what they're doing, what they think, what they react to, what they like, what would be their solution to any given problem."
+:"A wonderful exercise is take the Chart of Human Evaluation out into the society, call on a bank, call on a greengrocer, talk to a policeman, stop a casual pedestrian. Listen to the communication and look at them on the Tone Scale; see about where they are. You won't have to examine their past, present and future life to know what they're doing, what they think, what they react to, what they like, what would be their solution to any given problem."
-:"And we run into another scale and that is called the Effect Scale. Now, the Effect Scale is about the briefest scale there is. Now, although I've just gone over the ARC scale, don't you go forgetting it. And in Science of Survival there's that Chart of Human Evaluation. And the use of that scale directly in processing is with a modern process, if the worst PC you has doesn't raise one tone level totally in ten days of auditing, boy, are you losing.<br />
+:"And we run into another scale and that is called the Effect Scale. Now, the Effect Scale is about the briefest scale there is. Now, although I've just gone over the ARC scale, don't you go forgetting it. And in ''Science of Survival'' there's that Chart of Human Evaluation. And the use of that scale directly in processing is with a modern process. If the worst PC you have doesn't rise one tone level totally in ten days of auditing, boy, are you losing.<br />
 :A good PC will raise one tone level on the Chart of Human Evaluation in about one or two days of auditing - the whole behavior of the pc. You understand? They're very important. That's how you evaluate success - the emotional tones and changes. And they change in just that order, not some other order.<br />
-:All right, so let's get on to this Effect Scale. This is a way of gauging the ARC scale - its gauging the pc and measuring how much effect you're having on the pc. But when you start to measure how much effect you'd have on the pc let's not you make the mistake of being yourself upside down on the Effect Scale. The only people who never produce any results in auditing are haywire, upset, all out of gear, mishmashed on the Effect Scale.<br />
+:All right, so let's get on to this Effect Scale. This is a way of gauging the ARC scale - it's gauging the pc and measuring how much effect you're having on the pc. But when you start to measure how much effect you have on the pc let's not you make the mistake of you yourself being upside down on the Effect Scale. The only people who never produce any results in auditing are haywire, upset, all out of gear, mishmashed on the Effect Scale.<br />
 :What is the Effect Scale? Very handy scale. At the top of the scale, the individual can receive or give, or not receive or not give an effect, at will. So it's an effect. Now, as we go down scale, the individual becomes more and more anxious about producing an effect, and more and more leery of receiving one."

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 :"... let's take a look at these things called "dynamics." Well, if you look them over you will find out that the dynamics, as listed, give you subdivisions of functions and actions, rather than things.So you'll just have to get used to the idea of the things - the targets - are four universes. And these dynamics are urges or impulses. They are actions, urges, impulses which could be native to anything." <br />
-:"You'll find in old Indian books - it said, "Things got very bad. The whole race went into a decline. Everything was upset. Man, in effect, had gone to hell. He had begun to eat. It was so bad that he had even ate other animals."<br />
+:"You'll find in old Indian books - it said, "Things got very bad. The whole race went into a decline. Everything was upset. Man, in effect, had gone to hell. He had begun to eat. It was so bad that he even ate other animals."<br />
 :"Well, that to us today is almost a novel look. But if you look at it you'll find that - in general, that fifth dynamic is to a large degree a consumption thing now. Man is very interested in consuming the fifth dynamic so that he can go on surviving, which is about the silliest thing you've ever wanted to see."

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Whatever one's attitude toward the study of these lectures, it's strongly recommended studying the tapes in the order they were given. This is because course is structured so later lessons often build on earlier ones.
-A couple of scenes have changed for the better since these lectures were first given. Most likely Scientologists all over  the world have ?incubated? fields of their profession with Hubbard's ideas without  always calling it Scientology or Dianetics.
+A couple of scenes have changed for the better since these lectures were first given.  Most likely Scientologists all over the world have incorporated Hubbard’s ideas in their professions.
 Actually Ron must have already been aware of the changes in his time -  he remarks:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Articles
 |Topic=Basic Scientology
-|Author=Rbin (reviewer)
+|Author=Robin (reviewer)
 |Type of Article=Basic Scientology
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Articles
 |Topic=Basic Scientology
-|Author=Robin (reviewer)
+|Author=Rbin (reviewer)
 |Type of Article=Basic Scientology
 }}
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 L. Ron Hubbard gave these lectures to students of an HCA/HPA course in London. The first lecture was on April 6th 1959 and the closing lecture was on May 1st 1959. Usually Ron gave two lectures per day. The whole series contains 26 tapes and was published under the title "The Skills of a Theta Being".
-What Ron himself said about these course lectures, at the very end of lecture #13 (AXIOMS - SECOND LECTURE):<br />
+At the end of lecture #13, Ron himself said:<br />
-:"You'll graduate from this course, by the way, having had a greater coverage of Scientology than has been given in any course including ACCs for nine years."
+:"You'll graduate from this course, by the way, having had a greater coverage of Scientology than has been given in any course -- including ACCs -- for nine years."
-Some (subjective) opinions on these lectures by the reviewer.<br />
+Some (subjective) opinions on these lectures by the reviewer (Robin).<br />
-Ron's remark (see above) about the SHPA course lectures is not at all an exaggeration. Indeed, this lecture tapes cover everything a professional auditor has to know for successful clearing. That excludes, of course, the practical part and the processes. The lessons taught here, only occasionally contain examples using process commands to explain general principles of auditing. The main focus is always towards attitudes of auditor and preclear, mechanics of the mind and its aberrations, basic principles of processing, etc. In short, the stable data which will have validity independent of any technical advances or new processes in the future. It's those skills which, when they are missing in an auditor, no matter how advanced or sophisticated the processes he attempts to apply, may be, he will not succeed in his endeavour to improve a preclear's case. Examples for those vital tools are: codes, various charts, the Axioms, the Dynamics, the communication cycle, cycle of action and many more of the basics which make the very foundation on which Scientology and Dianetics are built.
+Ron's remark (see above) about the SHPA course lectures is not at all an exaggeration. Indeed, these lecture tapes cover everything a professional auditor has to know for successful clearing. That excludes, of course, the practical part and the processes themselves. The lessons taught here very occasionally contain examples using process commands to explain general principles of auditing. The main focus is always towards attitudes of auditor and preclear, mechanics of the mind and its aberrations, basic principles of processing, etc.: in short, the stable data which will have validity independent of any technical advances or new processes in the future. It's these skills which, when they are missing in an auditor, no matter how advanced or sophisticated the processes he attempts to apply, may be, he will not succeed in improving a preclear's case. Examples of these vital tools are: codes, various charts, the Axioms, the Dynamics, the communication cycle, cycle of action and many more of the basics which make the very foundation on which Scientology and Dianetics are built.
-En passant Ron conveys deep philosophical insights into the relationships between man, the universes man is concerned with and the mechanisms inside man's mind. This is what makes those tapes valuable even for those who feel no desire to become an auditor.
+Incidentally Ron conveys deep philosophical insights into the relationships between man, the universes man is concerned with and the mechanisms inside man's mind. This is what makes those tapes valuable even for those who feel no desire to become an auditor.
-Whatever ones attitudes toward the study of that lectures may be, it's strongly recommended to study the tapes in their consecutive order as they were given. The reason is, that the course is structured in a way that later lessons often build on earlier ones.
+Whatever one's attitude toward the study of these lectures, it's strongly recommended studying the tapes in the order they were given. This is because course is structured so later lessons often build on earlier ones.
-A couple of scenes have changed to the better since the time of those lectures. Most likely Scientologists all over  the world have incubated fields of their profession with Hubbard's ideas without  always calling it Scientology or Dianetics.
+A couple of scenes have changed for the better since these lectures were first given. Most likely Scientologists all over  the world have ?incubated? fields of their profession with Hubbard's ideas without  always calling it Scientology or Dianetics.
-Actually Ron must have already been aware of the changes in his time -  He remarks:
+Actually Ron must have already been aware of the changes in his time -  he remarks:
 "By the way, the whole American medical profession has now accepted prenatal banks because of Dianetics."<br />
 (Above quote taken from SHPA #10 "CODES")
-It can be said about that lectures: No matter what your case state or your state of education in Scientology may be, don't be surprised if you have a couple of cognitions on that material which can compete with cognitions gained in an auditing session.
+It can be said about the lectures: No matter what your case state or your state of education in Scientology may be, don't be surprised if you have a couple of cognitions on  this material which can compete with cognitions gained in an auditing session.
 The following is a short description of each of the SHPA tapes. In most instances it contains mainly excerpts from the tape transcripts which the author regards as characteristic for that particular lecture or of particular interest.
-Quotes are marked as such and put in quotation marks. Text which is not in quotation marks is the editor's comment.
+Quotes are marked as such and put in quotation marks and inset. Text which is not in quotation marks is the reviewer's (Robin's) comment.
@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 A lecture given on 7 April 1959
-:"You'll find in the Axioms a list of these postulates that more or less have to be made in order to keep a mind that way. And the Axioms are simply the rules of the universe of the mind that makes it a mind."
+:"You'll find in the Axioms a list of postulates that more or less have to be made in order to keep a mind that way. And the Axioms are simply the rules of the universe of the mind that makes it a mind."
 :"You just remember that if he made the postulate, he made it according to certain rules and it comes apart according to certain rules and those rules are found in the Axioms."
-:"Now, what's the third universe? The second universe is the mind. Now, what's this third universe? Well, it's actually really a sort of a subdivision, a sort of a Q and A, rather than a real universe and - you could argue about this. But to most people it is a universe, so we include it in it. And we include a body."
+:"Now, what's the third universe? The second universe is the mind. Now, what's this third universe? Well, it's actually really a sort of a subdivision, a sort of a Q and A, rather than a real universe and you could argue about this. But to most people it is a universe, so we include it in it. And we include a body."
-:"A body is apparently a universe. And it - a body plus its immediate possessions is just about as much universe as lots of people have. They've completely lost the second universe; they have no awareness at all of the first universe and this leaves them with a body."
+:"A body is apparently a universe. And it - a body plus its immediate possessions - is just about as much universe as lots of people have. They've completely lost the second universe; they have no awareness at all of the first universe and this leaves them with a body."
 :"A birth is not the source of a body, nor is sex the source of a body. It's merely the mechanics by which a body arrives. And I don't know that one can't just appear - unless somebody has made up a whole set of rules by which it must appear."

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ''''' New version posted 30th of August 2017. To be proof read'''''
-:''The special Hubbard Professional Audit lecture series is unusual, possibly unique, in that Ron Hubbard's lecture series were usually aimed at highly qualified auditors, while congresses and other lecture series were given to a broad range of Scientologists and non-Scientologists. This series of lectures is aimed at people who are not auditors but are dedicated to taking training as auditors and gives them the basic data that they need. See the short excerpt at the beginning of Robin's review for what Ron says about the series. Given in 1959 it gives the basics of auditing which are still applicable today. (Antony Phillips, editor and poster of this to Scientolipedia.)''
+:''The special Hubbard Professional Audit lecture series is unusual, possibly unique, in that Ron Hubbard's lecture series were usually aimed at highly qualified auditors while congresses and other lecture series were given to a broad range of Scientologists and non-Scientologists. This series of lectures is aimed at people who are not auditors but are dedicated to taking training as auditors and gives them the basic data they need. Given in 1959 it gives the basics of auditing which are still applicable today. See the short excerpt at the beginning of Robin's review for what Ron says about the series. (Antony Phillips, editor and poster of this to Scientolipedia.)''
 SHPA, Special Hubbard Professional Auditors Course (London).
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 L. Ron Hubbard gave these lectures to students of an HCA/HPA course in London. The first lecture was on April 6th 1959 and the closing lecture was on May 1st 1959. Usually Ron gave two lectures per day. The whole series contains 26 tapes and was published under the title "The Skills of a Theta Being".
-What Ron himself said about that course lectures, at the very end of lecture #13 (AXIOMS - SECOND LECTURE):<br />
+What Ron himself said about these course lectures, at the very end of lecture #13 (AXIOMS - SECOND LECTURE):<br />
 :"You'll graduate from this course, by the way, having had a greater coverage of Scientology than has been given in any course including ACCs for nine years."