Pat Krenik - Running "Objectives" - Revision history

Thetagal: " "

2020-02-20T22:07:50Z

" "

2013-12-26T02:44:50Z

2013-12-26T02:44:15Z

2013-03-25T15:22:05Z

Text replace - "index.php?title=" to "info/"

2012-10-05T08:31:29Z

2012-07-27T20:03:31Z

2012-05-01T13:58:09Z

2012-05-01T13:56:23Z

2012-03-11T04:03:04Z

2012-01-19T21:52:43Z

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 that picture could you confront" alternated with "rather not confront".
 The picture eventually blew after a few hours and she was no longer afraid
-of sharks. Well, all of that was before standard tech:)
+of sharks. Well, all of that was before "Standard Tech:)"
 But it isn't so much how long it is run, but is it the right process for
@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Not everyone needs objectives to start out.
-Not everyone is an "8" meaning low level case that must have objectives.
+Not everyone is an "8" meaning low level case that must have objectives.  And the surprising thing is, after OT III it is objectives that raise the skill level of an OT!
 It would really be hard to compare how long it takes because of no drugs in
 the 50's and also most preclears had had some auditing and case gain
 already. I'd say an hour or two because once you have had some auditing
-they bite better. That is probably why they are on Grade I.
+they bite better. That is probably why objectives are on Grade I.
 Every objective I had that I made good gain on was run at least an hour and

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Image=PatKrenik.jpg
 |Topic=Objectives
-|Author=[[Pat Krenik]]
+|Author=[[Patricia Krenik]]
 |Website=http://community.freezone-tech.info/elma/
 |Email=p_krenik@hotmail.com

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Image=PatKrenik.jpg
 |Topic=Objectives
-|Author=Pat Krenik
+|Author=[[Pat Krenik]]
 |Website=http://community.freezone-tech.info/elma/
 |Email=p_krenik@hotmail.com

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 = credits =
-*[http://scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Reading_and_Unreading_Auditing_Questions discussion re: Reading and Unreading Auditing Questions]
+*[http://scientolipedia.org/info/Talk:Reading_and_Unreading_Auditing_Questions discussion re: Reading and Unreading Auditing Questions]
-*[http://scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=The_LRH_I_Knew The LRH I Knew]
+*[http://scientolipedia.org/info/The_LRH_I_Knew The LRH I Knew]
 *Pat's Field Group [[FreeZone Academy of Elma WA]]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 "Assign an intention to that ______(indicated object) was the best
-objective I had had. Brought me up to a realization of purposes.
+objective I had had. Brought me up to a realization of purposes.***Found!
 "Tell me a lie about that wall" run with Op 8C. Do you see that wall?

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 Which reminds me of processes that make great gain that I can't find
 anywhere.
 "Assign an intention to that ______(indicated object) was the best

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 Love, Pat
+= references =
 *[[Objective Processes]]
 *[[Start-Change-Stop]]
+= credits =
 *[http://scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Reading_and_Unreading_Auditing_Questions discussion re: Reading and Unreading Auditing Questions]
 *[http://scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=The_LRH_I_Knew The LRH I Knew]
-*Pat's Field Group [http://scientolipedia.org/index.php?title=FreeZone_Academy_of_Elma_WA]
+*Pat's Field Group [[FreeZone Academy of Elma WA]]