Evolution of Auditing Techniques - Revision history

Dl88008: /* rudiments */

2012-05-24T18:08:05Z

‎rudiments

Dl88008 at 14:07, May 24, 2012

2012-05-24T14:07:45Z

Dl88008: /* quickie grades */

2012-05-23T21:05:57Z

‎quickie grades

Dl88008 at 18:50, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T18:50:20Z

Dl88008 at 18:02, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T18:02:40Z

Dl88008 at 17:19, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T17:19:03Z

Dl88008 at 17:13, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T17:13:01Z

Dl88008 at 17:10, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T17:10:49Z

Dl88008 at 17:01, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T17:01:45Z

Dl88008 at 17:01, May 23, 2012

2012-05-23T17:01:11Z

@@ Line 184: / Line 184: @@
 In the fall of 1968, the first class 8 course was delivered on
 the flagship and the graduates came back to the orgs and put in
-what we now know of as quickies.
+what we now know of as quickies. (''Editor Note: This assertion the original Class VIII's "put in" quickie grades or auditing is unconfirmed and readers should take it as speculation.'')
 It is only at this point in time that it was discovered that a
@@ Line 223: / Line 223: @@
 "I don't have any urge to make anybody wrong" (and of course most
 people wouldn't while they are on a persistent FN).
 = green form =
 However some new rundowns were put in to handle the problem of

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :''Editor Note: The following article was taken from a private email list where the author used a pseudonym. The author's real identity is not known and the pseudonym is not given here because it was posted on a private list. If or when the author of this piece wishes to come forward and take credit for it, it will be welcomed and appreciated.''
-:''It presents data this site cannot vouch for but is so compelling that it is presented here. Others are encouraged to write their own articles and link to this one, as well as comment and discuss this topic using the Discussion feature here. ("Discussion" tab above)'' [[User:Dl88008|Dl88008]] 10:42, 23 May 2012 (MDT)
+:''It presents data this site cannot vouch for but is so compelling that it is presented here for perspective on the difficulties encountered by those pioneering this new "science of the mind". Others are encouraged to write their own articles and link to this one, as well as comment and discuss this topic using the Discussion feature.'' [[User:Dl88008|Dl88008]] 10:42, 23 May 2012 (MDT)
 = single technique =
 With the May 1950 release of Dianetics the Modern Science of

@@ Line 129: / Line 129: @@
 late 1968.
 = quickie grades =
 Then you could run ARC straightwire. Just the one process, single
 flow. When it FNed you had a straightwire release. Of course self
@@ Line 179: / Line 180: @@
 This was the heritage of KSW and ethics and a standard lineup
 that included HCOBs like "all sickness equals PTS".
 = rudiments =
 In the fall of 1968, the first class 8 course was delivered on

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |Author=Unknown
 }}
 :''Editor Note: The following article was taken from a private email list where the author used a pseudonym. The author's real identity is not known and the pseudonym is not given here because it was posted on a private list. If or when the author of this piece wishes to come forward and take credit for it, it will be welcomed and appreciated.''
 :''It presents data this site cannot vouch for but is so compelling that it is presented here. Others are encouraged to write their own articles and link to this one, as well as comment and discuss this topic using the Discussion feature here. ("Discussion" tab above)'' [[User:Dl88008|Dl88008]] 10:42, 23 May 2012 (MDT)
+= single technique =
 With the May 1950 release of Dianetics the Modern Science of
 Mental Health came the idea that there was One Basic Why
@@ Line 37: / Line 38: @@
 And there was this idea of some key basic-basic which would undo
 everything.
+= multiple techniques =
 By the time of the [http://scientolipedia.org/sourcestore/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=162 Philadelphia Doctorate Course] (PDC) at the end
 of 1952, not only was Dianetics old and abandoned but even the
@@ Line 50: / Line 51: @@
 were using them briefly and then dropping them in favor of the
 next latest and greatest super techniques.
+= coha =
 Eventually, by mid 1954, we end up with Route 1/2 of [http://scientolipedia.org/sourcestore/index.php?route=product/product&path=76_62&product_id=154 Creation of Human Ability]. And that was a great set of super techniques,
 probably the best single collection that was put together in the
@@ Line 69: / Line 70: @@
 again focusing on a limited target and trying to run the entire
 case that way.
+= shsbc =
 And finally we have the St. Hill Special Briefing Course [SHSBC].
 Again most of the processes are old and we only use a limited
@@ Line 99: / Line 100: @@
 handful of techniques was still permeating the subject and in
 Ron thought that they had finally made it.
+= ksw =
 I began training in 1966. By then KSW had come out so that all
 other processes were gone under pain of being declared as a
@@ Line 127: / Line 128: @@
 always run an engram" around the time of the Class 8 course in
 late 1968.
+= quickie grades =
 Then you could run ARC straightwire. Just the one process, single
 flow. When it FNed you had a straightwire release. Of course self
@@ Line 178: / Line 179: @@
 This was the heritage of KSW and ethics and a standard lineup
 that included HCOBs like "all sickness equals PTS".
+= rudiments =
 In the fall of 1968, the first class 8 course was delivered on
 the flagship and the graduates came back to the orgs and put in
@@ Line 220: / Line 221: @@
 "I don't have any urge to make anybody wrong" (and of course most
 people wouldn't while they are on a persistent FN).
+= green form =
 However some new rundowns were put in to handle the problem of
 people falling on their heads. This was originally the 7
@@ Line 226: / Line 227: @@
 upset the PCs and then it became what we now know of as green
 form 40.
+= ksw? =
 I'm rambling a bit here, but it is to emphasize what the
 situation was in those days. The intention of the original
@@ Line 247: / Line 248: @@
 was probably Scientology' s darkest hour.
+= reinstatement =
 In 1970 the tech was reinstated. They didn't bother canceling all
 the cancels, Ron simply said that all the tech is for use. So you
@@ Line 261: / Line 262: @@
 processes legally, unless of course you call it an assist and do
 it without an official C/S.
+= creative processing =
 As to mockup processes, they were canceled back around 1963. But
 around the beginning of 1968, Ron issued the money process as
@@ Line 267: / Line 268: @@
 was shocking to some of the tech people.
-Also, sometime in 1969 or 70 (if I remember correctly), [[Yvonne
+Also, sometime in 1969 or 70 (if I remember correctly), [[Yvonne Gillham Jentzsch]] came around on tour doing group processing with the old group auditors handbooks. That went very
-Gilham]] (later Heber's wife) came around on tour doing group
 processing with the old group auditors handbooks. That went very
 well and so group processing was put back into use.
@@ Line 300: / Line 299: @@
 Also, OT drills are supposed to be up above modern OT 8.
 Therefore it would be mis-C/Sing to use them at lower levels.
+= the kitchen sink =
 Personally, I don't think that anything is canceled, but you
 would have to be prepared to argue this to get away with it in an
@@ Line 369: / Line 368: @@
 fixed ideas and tough policies that were meant to solve a problem
 that is long gone.
+= scarcity? =
 In a total scarcity of tech, you had better be afraid of a pin
 dropping because if you are only allowed one process and

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 Again most of the processes are old and we only use a limited
 subset. Techniques like R2-12 are used briefly and then abandoned
-with the ultimate target seen as GPMs and all other processing
+with the ultimate target seen as GPM's and all other processing
-simply being a way to get the person up to running GPMs.
+simply being a way to get the person up to running GPM's.
 If you examine the old tech volumes for the time period from the

@@ Line 231: / Line 231: @@
 standard tech of the 8 course was to do the minimum possible to
 get the person onto the clearing course to erase the bank and
-then get him up to OT 3 so that he could handle entities with
+then get him up to OT 3 so that he could handle...(''deleted upper level reference''). Those were considered the source of case and anything else was pretty rocks that might lead us from the path.
-incident 1 and 2. Those were considered the source of case and
 anything else was pretty rocks that might lead us from the path.
 And so most of the tech was gone, forbidden, and now we had a

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 At the same moment that the ultimate target was found to be
-unbelievably higher than the humanoid clear of DMSMH, the amount
+unbelievably higher than the humanoid clear of [http://scientolipedia.org/sourcestore/index.php?route=product/product&path=76_62&product_id=156 DMSMH], the amount
 of material that would have to be handled had seemed to jump by a
 factor of about a trillion to one.
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 everything.
-By the time of the Philadelphia Doctorate Course (PDC) at the end
+By the time of the [http://scientolipedia.org/sourcestore/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=162 Philadelphia Doctorate Course] (PDC) at the end
 of 1952, not only was Dianetics old and abandoned but even the
 technique 88 processes of just a few months before were
@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 next latest and greatest super techniques.
-Eventually, by mid 1954, we end up with Route 1/2 of Creation of
+Eventually, by mid 1954, we end up with Route 1/2 of [http://scientolipedia.org/sourcestore/index.php?route=product/product&path=76_62&product_id=154 Creation of
-Human Ability. And that was a great set of super techniques,
+Human Ability]. And that was a great set of super techniques,
 probably the best single collection that was put together in the
 early days. But please realize that when it was truly in use,
@@ Line 270: / Line 270: @@
 was shocking to some of the tech people.
-Also, sometime in 1969 or 70 (if I remember correctly), Yvonne
+Also, sometime in 1969 or 70 (if I remember correctly), [[Yvonne
-Gilham (later Heber's wife) came around on tour doing group
+Gilham]] (later Heber's wife) came around on tour doing group
 processing with the old group auditors handbooks. That went very
 well and so group processing was put back into use.

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 lineup of processes and most of the earlier processes were
 abandoned.
-[[File:File:LRH lecturing.jpg|right]]
+[[File:LRH lecturing.jpg|right]]
 They were not accumulating techniques in those days, instead they
 were using them briefly and then dropping them in favor of the